• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Hongkongers Dare To Show Their Rights?

Froggy

Alfrescian (InfP) + Mod
Moderator
Generous Asset
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
28,849
Points
113
What are the differences between Hongkongers and Singaporeans that made Hongkongers not only aware of their rights but also show the civil servants their rights?

[video=youtube;keZU7TxkY18]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keZU7TxkY18[/video]
 
[video=youtube;oCiy6sGd1Mc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCiy6sGd1Mc[/video]
 
South China Morning Post today

Legco storming may be forerunner to Occupy Central, government source says

Government fears Friday's protest was forerunner of Occupy Central blockade
Jeffie Lam
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 15 June, 2014, 5:28am
UPDATED : Sunday, 15 June, 2014, 9:01am



Activists clash with police outside Legco Building during Legco Finance Committee meeting.

The government fears the attempt to storm the Legislative Council building on Friday night was a trial run by activists for the Occupy Central campaign of civil disobedience, a source close to the administration revealed.

Protesters used bamboo poles to try to force open doors to the Legco building when a crowd that had gathered to oppose government plans to build two new towns grew angry.

Inside, Legco's Finance Committee had been due to vote on a HK$340 million funding request for engineering works linked to the development plan in the northeastern New Territories, which will cost many villagers their homes.

The source said the mayhem offered an insight into the looming Occupy Central movement, which threatens to blockade the city's business district if the government does not come up with a satisfactory plan for electing the chief executive in 2017. That is the year when, under the Basic Law, the city may vote in a chief executive by universal suffrage for the first time.

"It is expected that Occupy Central … will be hijacked by the same group of people who will push the movement away from its original goal. These people will take even bigger steps to storm Legco when it scrutinises the reforms for 2017," the source said.

Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying accused the protesters of "further aggravation in the wake of a spate of illegal events".


Activists clash with police outside Legco Building in Tamar after Legcon Finance Committee

Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor insisted the government would not shelve the HK$120 billion plan for the two new towns.

"People with a clear mind will notice that those who carried out the violent acts are not the villagers affected," she said.

But Labour Party lawmaker Dr Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung said: "The protesters know clearly what they are opposing. The unjust development project matters not only to the affected villagers but all Hongkongers.

"I hope Lam will stop insulting the protesters and start listening to the people."

The people storming the Legco building were ordinary Hongkongers rather than political groups, said Napo Wong Weng-chi, an activist who claims he was beaten after being arrested as officers cleared the remaining protesters from the site early yesterday.

"I don't see why anyone would break into buildings when they join Occupy Central, which stresses peacefulness," he said.

Dr Chan Kin-man, one of Occupy Central's founders, believed there was little threat of the campaign resulting in a similar clash with police. Officers used pepper spray to force the crowd back from the doors.

"Even if a small group of people do get radical, we believe we will be able to handle most of them," he said.

A total of 21 people, aged 19 to 72, were arrested in the protest.

After viewing damage to the building, Legco President Jasper Tsang Yok-sing condemned the "very serious violent acts".


The crown topple the barricades during the protest outside the Legco Building in Tamar

Activists say police attacked them after breaking up Legco protest


Activists claim they were punched and spat on by police after being arrested in the early hours of yesterday as police broke up their protest against development plans for the northeastern New Territories.

Five activists, including Jaco Chow Nok-hang, Leung Wing-lai and the League of Social Democrats' Napo Wong Weng-chi, said they were attacked in a police van en route from the Legislative Council building in Admiralty to Aberdeen Police Station.

"The police drew the curtain, turned the light off and started beating us about our heads," Chow said yesterday after being released on bail, bruises clearly visible on his forehead and ears. "They put handcuffs on three of us. They slapped and punched us, pulled our hair and even spat on our faces."

The violence stopped when they reached the station, where the activists were taken to a washroom to clean the blood off their faces before reporting to the duty officers, Chow said.

Wong said there about 10 police officers in the van with them. "Some of the police even kicked us," he added.


A protester arrested by police after the Legco Finance Committee meeting

The five protesters were among 21 people arrested, one of whom was 72 years old.

Labour Party Legislator Dr Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung also condemned the police for "using force" against his assistant, who he said had been handcuffed by officers even after he had introduced himself.

The assistant was also assaulted by several officers inside a police vehicle, Cheung said.

Police Commissioner Andy Tsang Wai-hung refused to comment on the accusations, but he said all complaints received were investigated impartially.

The Civil Human Rights Front described the alleged violence as "barbaric, illegal and unprofessional". It also urged the government watchdog to send representatives to any future rallies.

Meanwhile, the RTHK Programme Staff Union condemned the police for initially hauling away its TV reporter, Luther Ng Lap-tak, as officers moved in to clear the 100 or so people who were still protesting at the Legco site after midnight.

RTHK and the Hong Kong Journalists Association urged police to apologise over the incident.
 
Asian Confucius values do not permit the rebellion against the garmen.

Only Angmo demoncracy and freedom to do whatever they want like going on a shooting rampage allows rebellion against the garmen.

So people must freely own weapons like Assault and Sniper rifles.

It will become wild wild west Hee Haw!
 
Asian Confucius values do not permit the rebellion against the garmen.

Only Angmo demoncracy and freedom to do whatever they want like going on a shooting rampage allows rebellion against the garmen.


Uncle, you had not read the Analects
Please don't any how spread rumours
Confucious approved indeed required
People to rebel if conditions are right

The Mandate of Heaven, with its emphasis on ren of the ruler, sows a seed for rebellions. If the ideal ruler is to ensure the society’s prosperity through his virtue, adverse conditions such as severe flood, drought, or famine, which have been frequently recurring problems in China, are to be blamed upon the lack of virtue of the ruler. If the natural disasters devastate the country, the ruler has the obligation to amend the situation (offering famine and tax relief and so on). And if he fails to do so, the people consider it within their rights to rebel. The Mandate of Heaven, thus, functions as a kind of social contract. The rulers, not only the emperor but also local lords, are expected to show ren, or their love for the people, to ensure the mythical ideal state of the peaceful and prosperous world. If they fail to do so, the people have, at least theoretically, the right to remove the unworthy ruler.

Mencius, the Second Sage of Confucianism, clearly approved the elimination of unrighteous Zhou Wang (Mencius 1:2:8), a statement in the authoritative text hat made many Chinese emperors nervous. Many rebels in Chinese history did claim that they had the Mandate of Heaven to rebel. Two of Chinese dynasties were founded through this route. Liu Bang, the founder of the Han dynasty, started off as a peasant rebel warrior,* rose to the imperial throne, and ruled as Emperor Gao from 202 to 195 BCE. The founder of the Ming dynasty Zhu Yuanzhang (ruled as Hongwu Emperor 1368-1398) was also a peasant warrior who rose to the throne through his participation in the revolt against the Mongol rule.

http://www.demystifyingconfucianism.info/the-mandate-of-heaven
*
 
WHICH IS WHY HONKIES GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED
AND SINKIES STAY HEAD DOWN DOWN AND ARSEHOLES UP HIGH HIGH TO BE FUCKED TO BE TIEWED TO BE KANNED BY LKY AND HIS GANG OF PAP THUGS AND BASTARDS




Hang those PAP maggots cockroaches with piano wires from lamp posts to make them dance before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
BBQ those PAP maggots cockroaches before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
Cut a few more arseholes into those PAP maggots cockroaches to let out their shit before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.
Make those PAP maggots cockroaches eat joss sticks and candle wax before it is too late and we have no more CPF to get back.


PAP is finished.
The stinking glue and terror that hold PAP together is that old fart smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY. LKY is about to die in days or weeks.
LKY will never allow good decent people into the PAP and good decent people will not want to get into the PAP. Those in PAP are the most corrupt and moral degenerates and moral bankrupts and moral filths that are being presented to stinkaporeans as moral compasses.
None of those in PAP work for anyone but that smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY, to help him hold down Singaporeans to screw and fuck hundreds of BILLIONs from us all into smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY stinkapore sovereign funds.
They are there in PAP because LKY know that they are a bunch of self serving greedy bastards and scrapings of scums of society. To call them maggots cockroaches will be to insult real maggots and real cockroaches.


WE ALL ARE NOW WAITING FOR THE DEATH OF LKY IN COMING DAYS OR WEEKS.
WE ALL WILL YUM SENG AND YUM SENG AND YUM SENG AGAIN AND AGAIN DANCING SINGING ON TABLE TOPS AND STREETS
WE THEN WILL SEE THOSE IN PAP WITH SHARPENED KNIVES HOOTING ARSEHLOON A DOZEN NEW ARSEHOLES AND THE DEATH OF THE ENTIRE LEE KWA CLAN
WE THEN WILL PICK UP PIANO WIRES AND HANG ALL THOSE REMAINING PAP AND THEIR COLLABORATORS FROM LAMP POSTS AND SEE THOSE BASTARDS AND BITCHES DANCE.
AND HAPPINESS WILL RETURN TO OUR LAND.
AND STINKAPORE WILL BECOME SINGAPORE ONCE MORE.
https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en
 
the Hongkongers showed no originality. they copied it from the Taiwanese but with no success.

Sinkies should go and surround Parliament and Oxley Road too. return my territory !
 
What are the differences between Hongkongers and Singaporeans that made Hongkongers not only aware of their rights but also show the civil servants their rights?

HongKongers have genuine concerns over major issues that impact their lives. That's why they're prepared to show their mettle in public displays of defiance against the authorities and are willing to risk arrest to make their voices heard.

Singaporeans on the other hand a well taken care of by the government and are happy and content. They may be a few minor issue to grumble over once in a while but nothing big enough to warrant the same sort of behavior.
 
The government fears the attempt to storm the Legislative Council building on Friday night was a trial run by activists for the Occupy Central campaign of civil disobedience, a source close to the administration revealed.

[video=youtube;ddtSN4Vx1-s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddtSN4Vx1-s[/video]
 
HongKongers have genuine concerns over major issues that impact their lives. That's why they're prepared to show their mettle in public displays of defiance against the authorities and are willing to risk arrest to make their voices heard.

in other words , all the hongkietongs or honky tonks , including the
chief executive know their rights.
you don't arrest people just because they happened to be 5 in number.


Singaporeans on the other hand a well taken care of by the government and are happy and content. They may be a few minor issue to grumble over once in a while but nothing big enough to warrant the same sort of behavior.

in other words , sillypooreans know very well not to fall out of line and they even thanks
the executioner for the frequent screws that they got.
 
Ah Joe,,there is a difference between a Cantonese and a Hokkein,,,singapore is the way it is thanks to it being dominated by Hokkeins and their typical kiasu, kia see, kia bor, kiam siup and die dont want face attitude,,,
 
Asian Confucius values do not permit the rebellion against the garmen.

Only Angmo demoncracy and freedom to do whatever they want like going on a shooting rampage allows rebellion against the garmen.

So people must freely own weapons like Assault and Sniper rifles.

It will become wild wild west Hee Haw!

This is why western style democracy is not acceptable in SG. It will disrupt social order, create chaos and ruin the country. Taking to the streets does not solve problems. Look at Thailand, Egypt, etc and see the dire harmful consequences done to the country.

The commies in China will let these activists in HK run wild until they get out of hand and the PLA will crack down.
 
the Hongkongers showed no originality. they copied it from the Taiwanese but with no success.

Sinkies should go and surround Parliament and Oxley Road too. return my territory !

...and the Taiwanese copied it from which country? Egypt or Iraq? Sinkies are not that stupid to take to the streets to surround Parliament or Oxley Rd. Why should they? When their stomachs are full, nothing else matters.

You can always assume that when a country is griped by chaos resulting in street protests, burning of vehicles, building, etc, foreign subversive elements are always responsible, partially or wholly. As for SG, it must not happen in this country or it is finished for all sinkies.
 
Last edited:
honky tonks were docile like sinkies and PAP when under british rule. then they made a mistake and returned the territory to china. Now which Ah Pek in the right frame of mind would want to be under the despicable chinese rule. These people prefer to be under UMNO than PRC.
 
You can always assume that when a country is griped by chaos resulting in street protests, burning of vehicles, building, etc, foreign subversive elements are always responsible, partially or wholly. As for SG, it must not happen in this country or it is finished for all sinkies.

What a ridiculous statement. You can always assume that there are many people in the world who are interested in more than just a roof over their heads or a full stomach. You can safely assume too that when a people is not interested in freedom and justice and are NOT prepared to be the primary moving force behind getting these things for themselves, NO foreign countries, peoples or organisations will be much interested in helping them. However, when a people show that they ARE prepared to pay the price to get what they want, then help WILL come and when overthrowing tyrants you need ALL the help you can get PROVIDED those are not Trojan horses or conflict with your principles or values. The South African blacks certainly got a lot of foreign help, but the CAUSE of their discontent and the chaos that sprung from their rebellion is apartheid and not "foreign subversive elements".

[video=youtube;WyXagT21keo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyXagT21keo[/video]
 
Last edited:
What are the differences between Hongkongers and Singaporeans that made Hongkongers not only aware of their rights but also show the civil servants their rights?

[video=youtube;keZU7TxkY18]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keZU7TxkY18[/video]

The different with HK and Sickapoor is when you protest the Polis will arrest you and give you
free food and housing at Changi Bungalow!! Whereas in HK the gahmen will listen to their people!!

The protested ERP saying there's no Privacy! the HK Gahmen abolished ERP will Sickie gahmen listen??
The will just shaft into your throad like it or not! you protest they send you to Changi Bungalow!!
 
What are the differences between Hongkongers and Singaporeans that made Hongkongers not only aware of their rights but also show the civil servants their rights?

Difference is that HK Law is easier on protestors.

If the HKers dare to fly to their country's capital, Beijing to protest in front of Tiananmen Square, I will praise them to the sky.

 
What a ridiculous statement.You can always assume that there are many people in the world who are interested in more than just a roof over their heads or a full stomach. You can safely assume too that when a people is not interested in freedom and justice and are NOT prepared to be the primary moving force behind getting these things for themselves, NO foreign countries, peoples or organisations will be much interested in helping them. However, when a people show that they ARE prepared to pay the price to get what they want, then help WILL come and when overthrowing tyrants you need ALL the help you can get PROVIDED those are not Trojan horses or conflict with your principles or values. The South African blacks certainly got a lot of foreign help, but the CAUSE of their discontent and the chaos that sprung from their rebellion is apartheid and not "foreign subversive elements".

Hate to say so but we need to look at facts.

You can always assume that there are many people in the world who are interested in more than just a roof over their heads or a full stomach. You can safely assume too that when a people is not interested in freedom and justice and are NOT prepared to be the primary moving force behind getting these things for themselves

You can never satisfy all sectors of the population in each country. You will have liberals pushing for more freedom, gays pushing for their rights, etc. As for sinkies, they have a good life now but due to some of the pappies' dumb policies, sinkies are unhappy but not to the extent of erupting into a rebellion like what they did in Egypt. No way.

NO foreign countries, peoples or organisations will be much interested in helping them. However, when a people show that they ARE prepared to pay the price to get what they want, then help WILL come and when overthrowing tyrants you need ALL the help you can get PROVIDED those are not Trojan horses or conflict with your principles or values

The economic success of SG is the envy of many countries but there are also neighbouring countries which are jealous as well. Would they like to see SG going downhill? Internal strife and civil disobedience are often the ingredients to erode the stability of a country. The foreign countries just need to provide the sparks. Sinkies can hantum pappies to make way for a more efficient and caring Govt but never destabilise your own country.

The South African blacks certainly got a lot of foreign help, but the CAUSE of their discontent and the chaos that sprung from their rebellion is apartheid and not "foreign subversive elements

The South Africans suffered under apartheid of a white ruled Govt. The people pushed for equality in their own homeland and other western liberal groups assisted them. Sinkies have rights and power to elect their own chosen Govt but then, there were 60% dumb sinkies who voted for the pappies willingly in GE2011 to keep pappies in power. The major difference is no apartheid exists in SG.
 
Its also the fact is singapore is dominated by hokkeins which are nothing but a bunch of kia su, kia see, kia bor, kiam siup and die dont want face attitude,,,will support pap for a long time,,,

Difference is that HK Law is easier on protestors.

If the HKers dare to fly to their country's capital, Beijing to protest in front of Tiananmen Square, I will praise them to the sky.

 
Difference is that HK Law is easier on protestors.

If the HKers dare to fly to their country's capital, Beijing to protest in front of Tiananmen Square, I will praise them to the sky.


The Hong Kites will get slaughtered by the Tiongs in front of Tiananmen Square before they can put up their banners. No need for PLA to move in. Tiongs get bullied in Hong Kong. Hong Kites will perish in Beijing.
 
Back
Top