Why criticise LTK's opposition unity impossible speech when you had SDP's?

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
38,563
Points
113
SDP's (or rather Chee's) idea of a joint candidate was so flawed on so many regards. It was not, definitely not, akin the coalitions partiesin other countries as much as his posts on the SDP website said so. So now you have a sort of weak argument from Low. SDP's try was useless in the first place. Low isn't the best debater to argue but his argument stands better than SDP's/Chee's logic then.
 
SDP's (or rather Chee's) idea of a joint candidate was so flawed on so many regards. It was not, definitely not, akin the coalitions partiesin other countries as much as his posts on the SDP website said so. So now you have a sort of weak argument from Low. SDP's try was useless in the first place. Low isn't the best debater to argue but his argument stands better than SDP's/Chee's logic then.

Whatever had happened, happened. Whatever had been said, said.

Let's move on.

The voters shall decide if they trust more in WP, SDP or whatever P come the critical GE2016.
 
i just dunno why.

how come they can avoid 3 corner 4 corner fights in 2011?

who so many interests in Punggol?

because of the great Seafood?
 
Last edited:
i just dunno why.

how come they can avoid 3 corner 4 corner fights in 2011?

who so many interests in Punggol?

because of the great Seafood?

No, because this is a by-election and there is only one seat being contested. Otherwise in a general election there are more than enough seats to go around.
 
Back
Top