Whose Engrish more powderful? Founding Daughter's or Buy-High-Sell-Low's?

dr.wailing

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
2,584
Points
63
We all know the standard of Founding Daughter's Engrish, based on the feedback of I. Fernandez, an associate editor of The Straits Times.

We've also seen the proficiency level of written Engrish by Buy-High-Sell-Low when she "apologized" for posting a picture of a monkey showing its middle finger.

Whose Engrish is more power - Founding Daughter's or Buy-High-Sell-Low's?
 
For that I tend to agree with LKY - the essence is to be able to communicate your meaning n intention well in the simplest words possible. We r not writing poetry or literature. For writing for columns it ought to be readable n understandable by the masses. For that I think LWL is better than HC.
 
Anybody who thinks " timidness" is a real word definitely needs an editor.
 
The HO is a graphic communicator:

ho-ching-monkey-fb.jpg
 
Back
Top