Go there for Fark?
https://onepeterfive.com/pope-francis-worst-pope-in-history-pornocracy-pt-4/
The Worst Pope?
Having considered all these things, it’s hard to claim that Pope Francis is the worst pope in history, but I think it is certainly a reasonable claim that can be defended. It is an assertion that scholastics might call “probable.” It is true that Pope Francis is not personally corrupt in any way that is certain: sexually, financially, politically, socially, sinfully, etc., in ways that the popes of the first two pornocracies were openly corrupt.
The corruption of Pope Francis is of a different character: his corruption is in promoting people who are corrupt in all these ways, and then personally corrupting the Faith.
It is true that the doctrinal corruption is the worst corruption of all, in the same way that the First Commandment is First, and idolatry is the worst sin. The Pachamama abomination is just a visual manifestation of more than a decade of doctrinal corruption by means of ambiguity, negligence, emotional outbursts, orchestrating confusion, and perhaps most of all, suppressing the Latin Mass.
All of these things directly corrupt the soul, whereas all other forms of papal corruption can only indirectly corrupt souls by means of spiritual scandal, etc. In this way it would certainly be reasonable to say that Pope Francis is the worst pope in history. But it’s simply difficult to say that with certainty, since we only have scant historical data of past times and we are currently living through this one.
One could also make a reasonable argument, as I have done, that each Church crisis is worst than the last, climaxing in the end times reign of Antichrist. And so by this historical logic,
it would be reasonable to assert that Pope Francis is thus the worst pope in history.
---------------
