• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

When Will Carrie Declare An Emergency?

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
Emergency Regulations Ordinance

The Emergency Regulations Ordinance (Cap. 241) is a law of Hong Kong that confers on the Chief Executive in Council the power to make regulations on occasions that the Chief Executive believes to be an emergency or public danger. It was first introduced in Colonial Hong Kong in 1922 to combat the seamen's strikes which had immobilised the city's ports, and was invoked on several occasions during the colonial rule.[2]

Emergency Regulations Ordinance
Legislative Council of Hong Kong
Legislative history
Regional Emblem of Hong Kong.svg
Long title
  • An Ordinance to confer on the Chief Executive in Council power to make regulations on occasions of emergency or public danger.
CitationCap. 241
Enacted byLegislative Council of Hong Kong
Commenced28 February 1922
BillStrike Legislation Bill 1922[1]
Introduced byAttorney GeneralJoseph Horsford Kemp
First reading28 February 1922
Second reading28 February 1922
Third reading28 February 1922
Status: In force
In case of emergency or public danger, it can be invoked by the Chief Executive-in-Council. Under the provisions of the ordinance, the Chief Executive has the power to make "any regulations whatsoever which he may consider desirable in the public interest." Among the many powers permitting the Chief Executive to exercise upon invoking the ordinance, it also include arrests, property seizures, deportation, control of the ports and transportation, and censorship.[3][4]


The government invoked the ordinance during the 1967 Hong Kong riots, during the oil crisis in 1973[5], and during the 2019 Hong Kong protests.[4]

Contents

In January 1922, the Chinese Seamen's Union demanded pay rises of up to 40% from their local employers, and some 30,000 Chinese seamen went on strike. Their grievances lay in the fact that the average Chinese port worker's monthly income was insufficient to support his family while his Caucasian counterparts, who earned several times more, had been granted 15% wage rise. The Emergency Regulations Ordinance was passed by the colonial government that year – enacted in a single day – to combat the strikes, which paralysed the ports.[2]

Aside from format changes made in 2018, the last major amendments to the ordinance was in 1999.[6]

Provisions
A. On any occasion which the Chief Executive in Council may consider to be an occasion of emergency or public danger he may make any regulations whatsoever which he may consider desirable in the public interest.
B. such regulations may provide for:
  1. censorship, and the control and suppression of publications, writings, maps, plans, photographs, communications and means of communication;
  2. arrest, detention, exclusion and deportation;
  3. control of the harbours, ports and waters of Hong Kong, and the movements of vessels;
  4. transportation by land, air or water, and the control of the transport of persons and things;
  5. trading, exportation, importation, production and manufacture;
  6. appropriation, control, forfeiture and disposition of property, and of the use thereof;
  7. amending any enactment, suspending the operation of any enactment and applying any enactment with or without modification;
  8. authorising the entry and search of premises;
  9. empowering such authorities or persons as may be specified in the regulations to make orders and rules and to make or issue notices, licences, permits, certificates or other documents for the purposes of the regulations;
  10. charging, in respect of the grant or issue of any licence, permit, certificate or other document for the purposes of the regulations, such fees as may be prescribed by the regulations;
  11. the taking of possession or control on behalf of the Chief Executive of any property or undertaking;
  12. requiring persons to do work or render services;
  13. payment of compensation and remuneration to persons affected by the regulations and the determination of such compensation; and
  14. the apprehension, trial and punishment of persons offending against the regulations or against any law in force in Hong Kong
Colonial period
Scholars consider the law "a nuclear option" which "can literally run a dictatorship and suspend most rights."[3] The authority granted to censor specifically covers "the control and suppression of publications, writings, maps, plans, photographs, communications and means of communication."[3][4]
The last significant use of the law was in December 1973 during the oil crisis. Regulations were made to control the use of oil and motor fuel, to limit advertising displays and floodlighting. and to impose summer time.[7]

Special Administration Region period

On 4 October 2019, as a response to the 2019 Hong Kong protests the Chief Executive in Council invoked the Emergency Regulations Ordinance to impose a law to ban wearing face masks or obscure facial identificationin public assemblies.[8][9][10] Effective 00:00 HKT on 5 October 2019, offenders risk one year imprisonment or a fine of HK$25,000 ($3,200).[11][12] An application for judicial injunction of the anti-mask law was denied by court on the same night shortly before the new regulation took effect.[13] A subsequent attempt[14] by pro-democrats to halt the new regulation also failed, however, judicial review was recommended at a later date.[15]
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Those twits in the university really one kind. How long can you stay besieged? Imagine the water supply cut off, electricity supply cut off, how long can your electronic devices last?
 

sleaguepunter

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Those twits in the university really one kind. How long can you stay besieged? Imagine the water supply cut off, electricity supply cut off, how long can your electronic devices last?
Utilities cut already? News report university van use to bring supplies. So mata didn’t conduct embargo. Let more gather at one spot before going in to catch the whole lot?
More blood will be spill and lives will be lost. It will be a lost cause as many ppl forget the opponent is the Chinese Communist Party, a fascist organization that had plenty of experience in killing its own citizens. CCP is letting the hk govt to take the blame first, when the hk govt hesitate, the PLA will move in.
中華民國萬歲!!!
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
She don't have the nerve of steel and courage to do it unless central government wanted it.

She is more of a bureaucrat than politician like our very own hsk. Hence I can safely say that hsk won't perform much better than Carrie lam if we throw him in.
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
Things will be more certain after Taiwanese presidential election in 2 months. Moreover china is bidding their time.
1. To show the world that they are committed to one country two system.
2. To wait for more honkies to switch side as their jobs and daily lives get affected. But then there will be lesser resistance on central government intervention.

Of course central government would prefer SAR gov do it than to get their hands dirty. Once emergency law is invoke and they still cannot control the situation, then mainland authority will probably move in.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Every country will descend into chaos and turmoil when the oppies take over. Sinkies need to unite with PAP to protect Singapore from becoming a failed state like HK and Venezuela.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Every country will descend into chaos and turmoil when the oppies take over.

Opposition coalition now is a mad man’s dream. PAP will continue to be the ruling party, the contention right now is to deny the PAP of their two-thirds majority in Parliamentary seats with voting rights when bills are read.

So, fuck the PAP!
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Opposition coalition now is a mad man’s dream. PAP will continue to be the ruling party, the contention right now is to deny the PAP of their two-thirds majority in Parliamentary seats with voting rights when bills are read.

So, fuck the PAP!

In the coming GE, Singaporeans will reclaim back their lost territory from the oppies. The grassroots leaders have been campaigning hard to help our grassroots leaders get elected into public office.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
In the coming GE, Singaporeans will reclaim back their lost territory from the oppies.

May common sense prevail. PAP must never obtain 100% of the Parliamentary seats. Those NCMP seats without voting rights no count.
 
Top