• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

When investors start leaving Singapore

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
When investors start leaving Singapore, not only the foreign workers follow, many Singaporeans will lose their jobs, opposition parties don't tell you this. When foreign investors are here, they are not only doing their business here, not just setting up shop, hiring people, they are involved in many other economic transactions in Singapore.
Singaporeans should set a broader sights and not to be fooled by the opposition parties. It is not about losing 1 or 2 companies, it is not about losing a few workers, the impact on Singapore is more than just losing the few companies.
 

kampongboy

Alfrescian
Loyal
Please ask your dogs to do something about this.
Wages up is peanut.......50-100 dollars at most.
Rent goes up by thousands to millions.





The real problem
Shortage of foreign workers doesn’t kill as many SMEs in Singapore as rising business costs, especially rentals. By Seah Chiang Nee
Feb 17, 2013

(Synopsis: In an apparent bid to push the government population White Paper, the press has ignored the real pain of many Singaporean enterprises.)

AS the government was pushing for a larger population of immigrants, the media launched a bid to persuade Singaporeans on the need for more foreign workers.

A spate of reports told of how local businesses were suffering as a result of a shortage of workers.

It was clearly to reinforce the official “open door” line to help Singapore’s small and medium enterprises (SMEs), an important segment of the economy.

It wasn’t something that serious journalists – East or West – would normally do: Leaving out important parts of a national story to slant its angle.

The reports said that some 40% of the 6,000 SMEs were suffering because of the shortage. No reference to the real threat of rising business costs

According to the reports, three in 10 SMEs (defined as having S$1-S$10mil turnover) were considering moving away from Singapore or closing down because of manpower shortage.

The government had reduced approval rates for imported workers in the wake of public anger that too many foreigners are taking away local jobs and over-crowdedness.

These reports were half the truth. The shortage was indeed a serious obstacle to SMEs but far from being the most threatening.

That was the climbing cost of doing business in Singapore, with factors including the following: -

** High property rents. These contracts are generally revised after two or three years and property prices in land-short Singapore had risen by 50% in the last four years;

** Cars. Singapore is also one of the most expensive places in the world to buy a car or truck. A certificate of entitlement (COE) – costing up to S$100,000 that lasts only 10 years – is necessary before buying a vehicle; a motorist is charged electronically-deducted road fees during peak hours.

** Levies, taxes. The employer is also hit with levies for workers whom he employs, not to mention indirect taxes for supplies like Goods and Services Tax (GST).

So indirectly, the biggest woes to the SME are inflicted not by worker shortage, but by government policies and Singapore’s rising affluence that has significantly raised the cost of doing business.

With a per capita GDP of US$56,500 the republic has become one of the richest cities in the world.

Last week the Economist Intelligence Unit reported that Singapore is now the sixth most expensive city in the world.

It climbed three places from a year ago, beating Zurich into seventh place. In Asia, the Republic ranks third – next to Tokyo and Osaka.

The high cost of living – and doing business – is one of the biggest sources of worry among Singaporeans.

Last year 61% of people said in a survey that this was their top worry. For businessmen, this, too, applies.

The recent media reports were not wrong in saying the SMEs suffer from the tight workers market.

Traditionally, they have been a big consumer of manpower, employing 70% of Singaporean workers.

The fact is that many SMEs, including restaurants, retailers and small contract firms, are marginal operators.

In the past decade many were forced out of business for reasons other than insufficient workers.

In my neighbourhood centre, nearly half the coffee shops have shut down in the past few years, forced out by high rentals and replaced by shops selling higher value products.

Two were re-rented out for higher rates to a bank and a mini-mart.

Increasingly some of Singaporeans’ favourite hawker foods have become extinct, including goreng pisang (fried bananas) and rojak.

A vendor has to sell a large amount of both in order to pay for current rents.

The “Mom-and-Pop” provision shop has long been driven out of existence by the arrival of large supermarkets which could afford today’s business costs.

Their disappearance had nothing to do with shortage of workers since most were operated by family members. The main culprits were high rents and changing tastes.

Not everyone may be sad to see them go provided these once-upon-a-time SMEs have found profitable alternative businesses.
The biggest spoiler is spiralling rents.

A friend of mine who operates a cake shop in the centre of Singapore has to fight frequent battles against rising rentals of his premises.

In 2010, a year after Singapore’s recession, his landlord served notice that rentals were to increase by 50%. After negotiations, the hike was reduced to one-third.

The uncertainty of rents is the biggest worry of small businessmen not any shortage of workers, he said.

“If the economy is good and rents are stabilised, we can survive the competition,” he told me.

Singapore had Asia’s most expensive hotels last year despite a 2% drop in room rates.

What is happening in Singapore had been anticipated more than 20 years ago.

As a journalist, I had attended numerous press conferences in which the government had talked about economic restructuring and business innovation to overcome worker shortage.

The former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew had talked frequently about how as Singapore became prosperous, their operational costs would increase and competitiveness drop.

Singapore was following the way of advanced economies like the US and Europe, which began moving their manufacturing to Asia.

Singapore does not have enough workers to compete with large countries like China and India, Lee often told us.

In the 70s and 80s, Singapore had an average of seven jobs to every Singaporean applicant.

But his stand was “Let’s bite the bullet. Persuade the investors to go to Batam and Johor, and we move up-market,” I remember him saying.

This was first published in The Star).

© Copyrights 2013: All material on this site, except where otherwise accredited, is copyright to LittleSpeck.com. Media or users are welcome to quote from articles on this site but only with the expressed permission of the owner and with attribution to the website or as part of any commercial service without the prior written or expressed permission of the owner of the website.
 

DeathThreat

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When investors start leaving Singapore, not only the foreign workers follow, many Singaporeans will lose their jobs, opposition parties don't tell you this. When foreign investors are here, they are not only doing their business here, not just setting up shop, hiring people, they are involved in many other economic transactions in Singapore.
Singaporeans should set a broader sights and not to be fooled by the opposition parties. It is not about losing 1 or 2 companies, it is not about losing a few workers, the impact on Singapore is more than just losing the few companies.
cool, lets all die together.
 

lifeafter41

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Please ask your dogs to do something about this.
Wages up is peanut.......50-100 dollars at most.
Rent goes up by thousands to millions.





The real problem
Shortage of foreign workers doesn’t kill as many SMEs in Singapore as rising business costs, especially rentals. By Seah Chiang Nee
Feb 17, 2013

(Synopsis: In an apparent bid to push the government population White Paper, the press has ignored the real pain of many Singaporean enterprises.)

AS the government was pushing for a larger population of immigrants, the media launched a bid to persuade Singaporeans on the need for more foreign workers.

A spate of reports told of how local businesses were suffering as a result of a shortage of workers.

It was clearly to reinforce the official “open door” line to help Singapore’s small and medium enterprises (SMEs), an important segment of the economy.

It wasn’t something that serious journalists – East or West – would normally do: Leaving out important parts of a national story to slant its angle.

The reports said that some 40% of the 6,000 SMEs were suffering because of the shortage. No reference to the real threat of rising business costs

According to the reports, three in 10 SMEs (defined as having S$1-S$10mil turnover) were considering moving away from Singapore or closing down because of manpower shortage.

The government had reduced approval rates for imported workers in the wake of public anger that too many foreigners are taking away local jobs and over-crowdedness.

These reports were half the truth. The shortage was indeed a serious obstacle to SMEs but far from being the most threatening.

That was the climbing cost of doing business in Singapore, with factors including the following: -

** High property rents. These contracts are generally revised after two or three years and property prices in land-short Singapore had risen by 50% in the last four years;

** Cars. Singapore is also one of the most expensive places in the world to buy a car or truck. A certificate of entitlement (COE) – costing up to S$100,000 that lasts only 10 years – is necessary before buying a vehicle; a motorist is charged electronically-deducted road fees during peak hours.

** Levies, taxes. The employer is also hit with levies for workers whom he employs, not to mention indirect taxes for supplies like Goods and Services Tax (GST).

So indirectly, the biggest woes to the SME are inflicted not by worker shortage, but by government policies and Singapore’s rising affluence that has significantly raised the cost of doing business.

With a per capita GDP of US$56,500 the republic has become one of the richest cities in the world.

Last week the Economist Intelligence Unit reported that Singapore is now the sixth most expensive city in the world.

It climbed three places from a year ago, beating Zurich into seventh place. In Asia, the Republic ranks third – next to Tokyo and Osaka.

The high cost of living – and doing business – is one of the biggest sources of worry among Singaporeans.

Last year 61% of people said in a survey that this was their top worry. For businessmen, this, too, applies.

The recent media reports were not wrong in saying the SMEs suffer from the tight workers market.

Traditionally, they have been a big consumer of manpower, employing 70% of Singaporean workers.

The fact is that many SMEs, including restaurants, retailers and small contract firms, are marginal operators.

In the past decade many were forced out of business for reasons other than insufficient workers.

In my neighbourhood centre, nearly half the coffee shops have shut down in the past few years, forced out by high rentals and replaced by shops selling higher value products.

Two were re-rented out for higher rates to a bank and a mini-mart.

Increasingly some of Singaporeans’ favourite hawker foods have become extinct, including goreng pisang (fried bananas) and rojak.

A vendor has to sell a large amount of both in order to pay for current rents.

The “Mom-and-Pop” provision shop has long been driven out of existence by the arrival of large supermarkets which could afford today’s business costs.

Their disappearance had nothing to do with shortage of workers since most were operated by family members. The main culprits were high rents and changing tastes.

Not everyone may be sad to see them go provided these once-upon-a-time SMEs have found profitable alternative businesses.
The biggest spoiler is spiralling rents.

A friend of mine who operates a cake shop in the centre of Singapore has to fight frequent battles against rising rentals of his premises.

In 2010, a year after Singapore’s recession, his landlord served notice that rentals were to increase by 50%. After negotiations, the hike was reduced to one-third.

The uncertainty of rents is the biggest worry of small businessmen not any shortage of workers, he said.

“If the economy is good and rents are stabilised, we can survive the competition,” he told me.

Singapore had Asia’s most expensive hotels last year despite a 2% drop in room rates.

What is happening in Singapore had been anticipated more than 20 years ago.

As a journalist, I had attended numerous press conferences in which the government had talked about economic restructuring and business innovation to overcome worker shortage.

The former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew had talked frequently about how as Singapore became prosperous, their operational costs would increase and competitiveness drop.

Singapore was following the way of advanced economies like the US and Europe, which began moving their manufacturing to Asia.

Singapore does not have enough workers to compete with large countries like China and India, Lee often told us.

In the 70s and 80s, Singapore had an average of seven jobs to every Singaporean applicant.

But his stand was “Let’s bite the bullet. Persuade the investors to go to Batam and Johor, and we move up-market,” I remember him saying.

This was first published in The Star).

© Copyrights 2013: All material on this site, except where otherwise accredited, is copyright to LittleSpeck.com. Media or users are welcome to quote from articles on this site but only with the expressed permission of the owner and with attribution to the website or as part of any commercial service without the prior written or expressed permission of the owner of the website.

As said, REITs is just another layer for fat fees, screw shareholder and ultimately screw the consumers.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
As said, REITs is just another layer for fat fees, screw shareholder and ultimately screw the consumers.

REITS is going back 1000 years in China and taxing poor farmers. No need to work just see people work and make more, tax the land.
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Why are you posting the same senseless argument in multiple threads?



hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. the bitch/cunt is just following its grand masters' instructions:biggrin:
3. the same old fear tactics.
4. it may work for those dafter sheep and generations before us.
5. nowadays, it does not carry any weight hoh
 

nitecrawllerr

Alfrescian
Loyal
Remember that time when Tg Pelapas lower their rates? Few co relocate their business there. But most of them still stick to PSA. Why?

So likewise too. Foreign investors are not stupid. They know our infrastructures are there. They will still come and invest here in doves. Few thousands or even a million dollars (in terms of wages) to MNCs are peanuts to them
 

bhoven

Alfrescian
Loyal
As said, REITs is just another layer for fat fees, screw shareholder and ultimately screw the consumers.
Agree completely...it created monopololistic landlords. This may have helped the financial sector by creating new investment products but at what costs multiplied down the line? The notion that BIG is beautiful is sometimes too simplistically translated in policy making by the government viz public transport as in buses, taxis...
 

saratogas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Business owners only care about profit... As long as they can get their return$, they always adapt to change so it is important for them to employ Talent to make sure they continue milking the cow.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Investors always leave and go elsewhere. By what is said by the ape that needs till 3013 to make arguments, there are a lot of haters in USA as many of their jobs are lost to investments overseas.
 

geylangchickenloyangduck

Alfrescian
Loyal
nah beh....don't try to suck in what the media say like cum can or not? Asia is where the honey is now. if these MNCs don't stay, they go where?

indonesia / mudland / india? yah....where productivity is fraction? anyways....if these MNCs are to survive only on low costs, then they shldn't be here in the first place.

we are just forcing them to move up the economy scale ladder - like US. US is also high costs - but industries thrive there. u don't see massive outflow of MNCs...
 

Glaringly

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
What are these investers doing here? Coming here to scam Singaporeans?

Seriously we are better off without this group.
 

iamhere

Alfrescian
Loyal
When investors start leaving Singapore, not only the foreign workers follow, many Singaporeans will lose their jobs, opposition parties don't tell you this. When foreign investors are here, they are not only doing their business here, not just setting up shop, hiring people, they are involved in many other economic transactions in Singapore.
Singaporeans should set a broader sights and not to be fooled by the opposition parties. It is not about losing 1 or 2 companies, it is not about losing a few workers, the impact on Singapore is more than just losing the few companies.




we had long been a welfare state for papees n cronies where they first claim that
they should be paid XXX amount of $$$ if not, they would be better off in private sector or in biz themselves.

By "default", since we do not have enough opposition to veto all these "claims", these leeches at the first split second
when they are elected or "elected" thru walkovers, commit FUNDAMENTAL BREACH of what they claim.

They hold tonnes of appointments, directorships and/or in biz themselves.

Having more than one appointment does not give one more than 24hrs per calendar day...

Question remains: WHO did they neglect?

Shareholders of public listed companies?

(Public) Stakeholders of GLC or statutory boards?

or???


We had long been providing WELFARE STATE facilities for PAPees n CRONIES....


MY FELLOW SINGAPOREANS PLEASE...

REMEMBER to

VOTE papees OUT


do yrself, yr forefathers and yr generations to come, a favor, a service and a long-awaited justice




:wink::wink::wink::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::wink::wink::wink:
 

iluvgst

Alfrescian
Loyal
We used to have the rent control act to rein in the rentier wealth. Maybe it's time to reinstate rent control to stabilize the rents and keep the greed at bay.
 
Last edited:

Alamaking

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When investors start leaving Singapore, not only the foreign workers follow, many Singaporeans will lose their jobs, opposition parties don't tell you this. When foreign investors are here, they are not only doing their business here, not just setting up shop, hiring people, they are involved in many other economic transactions in Singapore.
Singaporeans should set a broader sights and not to be fooled by the opposition parties. It is not about losing 1 or 2 companies, it is not about losing a few workers, the impact on Singapore is more than just losing the few companies.

That will not happen at all, unless got war, disasters
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When investors start leaving Singapore, not only the foreign workers follow, many Singaporeans will lose their jobs, opposition parties don't tell you this. When foreign investors are here, they are not only doing their business here, not just setting up shop, hiring people, they are involved in many other economic transactions in Singapore.
Singaporeans should set a broader sights and not to be fooled by the opposition parties. It is not about losing 1 or 2 companies, it is not about losing a few workers, the impact on Singapore is more than just losing the few companies.

You are not wrong on this but I have been hearing this since 1976, so it is getting kind of stale...we have 'bitten the bullet' & rode through many economic storms & came out wiser. The people must have the will to work together, whether side of political parties we support & in.

It is time to weed out those companies that are here & does little to contribute to the economy, SINgaporeans must have always ,the FIRST BITE of any opportunity to put food on the table & a roof over the head & raise the next generation.

Bad mouthing oppositions will not help, we are all in together...it is either one & all work together or whiter..unless your kind, will be like the rats, which will jump ship, when it is burning & sinking..
 
Last edited:

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are not wrong on this but I have been hearing this since 1976, so it is getting kind of stale...we have 'bitten the bullet' & rode through many economic storms & came out wiser. The people must have the will to work together, whether side of political parties we support & in.

It is time to weed out those companies that are here & does little to contribute to the economy, SINgaporeans must have always ,the FIRST BITE of any opportunity to put food on the table & a roof over the head & raise the next generation.

Bad mouthing oppositions will not help, we are all in together...it is either one & all work together or whiter..unless your kind, will be like the rats, which will jump ship, when it is burning & sinking..

O.K I agree with you on this.

Many FT companies are crap especially in the financial and services. hell, some or many were set up to con the Sinkie and juice the funds from the PAP.

But then many local companies owned by local bosses are also CRAP. The boss takes all the money, offer little to his workers be they local or FT and does little to improve

To say that if one follows the opportunites and would jump ship if the opportunites exist eslewhere, is basic survival instinct, nothing wrong with that.

What was and still is WRONG , are your Pap master's way of running the ship, only if the ship steers in such a way to BENEFIT THEM!

So if you want to make a fair comment.

You take out both of kinds of empolyers. And you also must take out the worthless, balless, useless and hopeless Sinkie that reside to benefit without much value in return.

So are you or the Pap or even oppo prepared to do that?
 
Top