• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Well At Least Malaysia is democratic!

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
They really have oppositions in Parliament!! :biggrin:

On the face of it, the National Front appears to have done well. It won 133 seats in the 222-member Parliament — down a fraction from the 135 it won in 2008. The opposition People's Alliance coalition led by Anwar Ibrahim won 89 seats. But look deeper and the numbers carry a grim story for Najib:
 

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Malaysia is far more democratic than Singapore.

No greater a fucking bastard then the smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY in his iron control of Stinkapore aided by his fucking maggots in white and his fucking pet kangaroos.

Our only hope is that LKY will be eating joss sticks and candles very very soon.
We can open our bubblies and XOs and go

YUM SENG YUM YUM YUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM SENG
 

blissquek

Alfrescian
Loyal
Malaysia is far more democratic than Singapore.

No greater a fucking bastard then the smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY in his iron control of Stinkapore aided by his fucking maggots in white and his fucking pet kangaroos.

Yes..Malaysia is more transparent..

When Bank Negara went bersek with its Forex speculation in the 90"s., and lost billions., The Malaysian parliament tabled it out and put a stop to it..

In Singapore, can we table it out in Parliament..?? for the countless billions we lost in our investment..???
 
Last edited:

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Malaysia is far more democratic than Singapore.

No greater a fucking bastard then the smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY in his iron control of Stinkapore aided by his fucking maggots in white and his fucking pet kangaroos.

Yes..Malaysia is more transparent..

When Bank Negara went bersek with its Forex speculation in the 90"s., and lost billions., The Malaysian parliament tabled it out and put a stop to it..

In Singapore, can we table it out in Parliament..?? for the countless billions we lost in our investment..???

Dont exaggerate lah.

It is not countless.

It is 700 to 800++ billions that smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY got into his Stinkapore sovereign funds, alll screwed and fucked from the sinkies
As LKY said, for the GREATER GOOD OF SINGAPORE

GREATER GOOD DO NOT COME CHEAP CHEAP YOU KNOW.
 

whoami

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Too much of democracy like speaking out in rally, organising rally with furry speech is juz not Asean culture. All these will lead to riots and protest if not carefully handle. Look at Indonesia. Msia is a big multi racial country. Not easy to govern. I think the govt make a mistake of abolishing the ISA, imo. Tks to tat mamak berseh.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
If Temasick lost billion who dares to table in
ParLeement? the first white maggot who opened his big mouth will
be eliminated from ParLeeMent!
 

andyfisher

Alfrescian
Loyal
I keep telling people, mudland is far more democratic than spore.

their civil societies like bersih is very engaged in people's welfare,

unlike spore, which despite being or even more racist is becoming more autocratic.

the mudland m&ds are compassionate racists compared to the urines we have here.

at least there, you kena stabbed in the dark, you know who the fucker is and can do something about it. here is good luck to you. you get stabbed in the back and the fucker will smile and also sayang too while still stabbing. knn
 

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If Temasick lost billion who dares to table in
ParLeement? the first white maggot who opened his big mouth will
be eliminated from ParLeeMent!


So we all work together and get all those bastards maggots in white out in 2016
No more of those LEE cancer cells and putrifying organs corrupting Singapore.

And then we will find out how much they stole from all of us.

HANGING TIMES FOR MAGGOTS WILL BE NEAR
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Malaysia has freedom of assembly.

In Singapore, four people gathered at one place is an 'illegal gathering'. :rolleyes:

And there is a designated 'Speaker's Corner' where you need to apply for a permit to speak there.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
They really have oppositions in Parliament!! :biggrin:

On the face of it, the National Front appears to have done well. It won 133 seats in the 222-member Parliament — down a fraction from the 135 it won in 2008. The opposition People's Alliance coalition led by Anwar Ibrahim won 89 seats. But look deeper and the numbers carry a grim story for Najib:

Do not look at the number of seats, the nett figures between the two, is about 4,000 plus votes. The Chinese voted for the opposition DAP instead for MCA, which is in BN, despite Dr.M making noises that they are ex -PAP & wonder if he will have to eat his words on Gelang Patah?? The urban Malays abandoned UMNO for PAS, PKR etc.. The Indians were relatively quiet this time around.

Najib backside is getting warmer by the days..but honestly, it is better to have Najib around that, what is next we going to get... and that we do not need to guess...hint " Kris" waving person..:(
 
Last edited:

ray_of_hope

Alfrescian
Loyal
Malaysia has freedom of assembly.

In Singapore, four people gathered at one place is an 'illegal gathering'. :rolleyes:


You are out-of-date. They changed the law in 2009: now even one person can be locked up, if he/she is deemed to be disruptive in public:

The focus, which used to be based on the number of persons participating in the above gatherings or meetings, is now shifted to whether the activity is disruptive to the public, even if the activity is conducted by only one person.

http://www.khattarwong.com/images/stories/pdf/public_order_act.pdf
 

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wah Najib wants a racial riot in Malaisia?

Malaysia Kini

Malaysia GE13: Kit Siang calls on Najib to stop race baiting - The Straits Times
Straits Times - ‎4 minutes ago‎



GEORGE TOWN - Gelang Patah MP Lim Kit Siang has called on Prime Minister Najib Razak to stop all race baiting, especially through the Umno-owned paper, Utusan Malaysia, that had a front-page report blaming the Chinese for Barisan Nasional's poor ..
 

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Wah Najib wants a racial riot in Malaisia?

How come they dun arrest Najib?

Malaysia GE13: Two bloggers detained for alleged racial postings
Straits Times - ‎48 minutes ago‎



KUALA LUMPUR (THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK) - Two bloggers in Malaysia - Papa Gomo, 33, and King Jason, 38 - have been detained by police for blog postings that allegedly fuelled racial sentiments and spread lies.
 

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why NAJIB MUST GO!!

When Najib failed as a statesman


Ram Anand
3:35PM May 7, 2013



COMMENT Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak likes to brand himself as a perfect mixture between a "politician" and a "statesman".

There is no denying Najib's political wit. After all, politics has been all about survival, and despite many lingering questions over his own integrity, Najib has survived long enough to become the premier of the country for another five years, barring an anticipated leadership challenge.

However, the measure of a statesman can be defined easily by one's ideology and public statements, and that is something Najib has to reflect upon and admit - at least in the confines of his own office - that he has failed miserably at.

NONEThe measure of a statesman is determined by their reaction to critical situations - especially in scenarios where he is leading a highly divided demographic - and Najib had just undone all the work he had undertaken in his four years, including his coining of the ‘1Malaysia’ slogan- with his horrible gaffe in branding the election results on Sunday as a result of a "Chinese tsunami".

While talking about a process of national reconciliation - whatever that was supposed to mean - Najib followed up immediately in the next sentence by blaming the result on the Chinese community, and even more dangerously, appearing to brand the opposition movement as a result of "extremist ideology".

But this is not the first time Najib had heftily contradicted himself or failed to act with any form of ‘civility’, a term that he likes to use liberally without even understanding the real etiquette of civility.

Ever since assuming premiership four years ago, Najib trailblazed into Pakatan Rakyat-led states to make a case for the states of Penang, Selangor and Kelantan to be returned to the BN fold. And he went about it in the most condescending way imaginable.

Dodging any public dialogue, forum or debate on policies, he stood on the comfort of BN-backed platforms and threw baseless allegations and wilfully distorted facts about Pakatan administrations - he was one of those politicians making a cacophony of noise with desperate hopes that his shouts will muffle out any dissent or counter arguments.

He was busy telling the people that only BN can do a proper job in these states. He made assessments that Pakatan is not fit to lead these wealthy states, without outlining any concrete reasons.

BN knows best?

This man was telling the people that BN knows best. But this was the same man that during a national day gathering said that the "the days of the government knows best is now over". If he can't see his own hypocrisy, Najib must be as delusional as ever in branding himself as a statesman.

And when it dawned upon him on the wee hours of May 6 that he failed to obtain a two-thirds majority - a promise he made to Umno and BN without as much as assessing the ground sentiments - and that he failed miserably in Selangor despite being the elections director for his party there, Najib turned his ire on the Chinese community.

After spending four years condescending the people for having chosen Pakatan in 82 parliamentary seats, he is now blaming the people for having voted for Pakatan in 89 parliamentary seats.

I was one of those who was expecting that regardless of the election outcome, there would be civility and magnanimity in the course of conversation in the political arena if BN was denied a two-thirds majority for a second time.

It was understandable for the old guards to spend time harping on minor slip-ups for the 2008 election results and continue believing they are given the eternal honour of managing the country. But being denied a two-thirds for a second time means they needed to look for a new excuse - or even better, a full acceptance that a two-party system has emerged in Malaysia and must be embraced.

But Najib, known as a moderate leading a flock of right-wing groups, walked straight into the annals of right-wing extremism by cooking up an excuse that will now last and linger on for months and maybe years to come - that the Chinese had turned against BN because they have been taken in by promises and even suggested "extremist ideologies" that must be put aside.

NONEAnyone who had followed Malaysian politics for long enough knows what he was referring to - though the million dollar question is whether Najib knows the kind of conversation he is creating with his statement.

Racial tension and racial divide will only play into the hands of Umno, MIC and MCA. It will make them relevant again. And with MCA's refusal to take up government posts and party president Chua Soi Lek's (left) statement that the result would mean the birth of a "two-race system", it is clear that the BN leaders are training their guns on the Chinese community, even laced with a sense of vengeance.

This is not good for the nation - not after an election that should have officially heralded a new age for a two-party system.

Instead of focusing, thanking and be grateful to the 47 percent of the population that had voted for BN and helped in its course to attain 133 parliamentary seats - Najib focused on the other divide of the population that voted against him - and worse, failed to respect their choices.

He started his new premiership by making enemies, and not friends.

Najib has just missed the bus to become a statesman. And no matter how much he does to repair the damage over the next five years, this statement - even though it was uttered with finesse and some sense of intellectual ambiguity - will be remembered.

RAM ANAND is a member of the Malaysiakini team.
 

Pocong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Wah Najib wants a racial riot in Malaisia?

Dr M blames ungrateful Chinese and greedy Malays for BN???s worst performance


PUTRAJAYA, May 7 – Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today he was shocked by Barisan Nasional’s poor performance in Election 2013, and laid the blame on ‘ungrateful’ Chinese and ‘greedy’ Malay voters.

He said there was clearly a “Chinese tsunami,” using a phrase used by Datuk Seri Najib Razak immediately after Sunday’s election results showed BN had fared worse that in 2008.

“Most of the Chinese had rejected the Malays’ hands of friendship ... And that was what we call the ‘tsunami’,” Dr Mahahthir (picture) said in a press conference here after Election 2013.



“At the same time, we cannot deny Malays who have become greedy. They all want power without considering the means, if they needed to sell out their race they will sell it out.”

He blamed Malay politicians for using the polls just as a means to be elected MP and gain personal benefits, instead of a way to form a government and defend their race, religion, and motherland.

Dr Mahathir also accused DAP of inciting hatred towards Malays in its campaign for Gelang Patah, which had then spread to the Chinese all across the country contributing to BN’s losses.

The former prime minister expressed concern that BN component party MCA will not be participating in state and federal cabinet posts, which he claimed will mean no representation for the Chinese in the government.

“Do we forget about them altogether or do we find some candidates? ... If there is no Chinese representative, the situation will not be good for government and country,” he said.

Claiming that forming multiracial parties is not possible and a coalition of racial parties is the best way for Malaysia, Dr Mahathir warned that BN will break down if MCA withdraws.

BN chairman Najib had today dismissed polls data showing an urban-rural divide and defended Utusan Malaysia against accusations of racism after the Umno-owned paper blamed the Chinese for the coalition’s poor showing in the May 5 polls.

Analysts have said data from voting trends showed the outcome of Election 2013 was not simply the result of a “Chinese tsunami” as Datuk Seri Najib Razak has claimed but a major swing in the urban and middle-class electorate that saw Malaysia’s urban-rural rift widen.

But Utusan Malaysia, a newspaper that has represented the right-wing forces aligned largely with Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, decided today to publish a number of stories blaming the Chinese for dividing Malaysia.

Umno’s Utusan Malaysia front-paged today the question “Apa lagi Cina mahu (What else do the Chinese want?) in what appeared to be an attempt to shape the results of Election 2013 as a Chinese-vs-Malay vote.

In Sunday’s elections, BN won 133 out of 222 federal seats, short of a two-thirds majority and worse than in the previous polls.

It also lost the popular votes to Pakatan Rakyat (PR) parties, and was bested on the popularity front for the first time since 1969, when it had contested as the Alliance Party.

For federal seats, BN polled 5,237,699 votes to the Pakatan Rakyat parties’ combined 5,623,984 ballots. The three-party pact of PKR, PAS and DAP also surpassed BN in state seats, pulling in 4,879,699 to the 13-member coalition’s 4,513,997 ballots.

Voting data showed urban voters of different races abandoned support for BN with the coalition winning the elections on the back of solid support from rural Malays and voters from Sabah and Sarawak.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/...-and-greedy-malays-for-bns-worst-performance/
 

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bahaha!! Dr. Mahaha said Najib did worse than Pak Lah!!

Dr M: I didn't expect Najib to do worse than Pak Lah


Ram Anand
3:35PM May 7, 2013


Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad admitted today he did not expect Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to do worse in this general election than his predecessor Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 2008.

Mahathir, a vociferous critic of the Pak Lah administration, said that he thought Najib would have done at least better than Abdullah, who led BN to take 140 parliamentary seats in the 12th general election.

NONENajib, despite having promised Umno and BN supporters that he would deliver a two-thirds majority, could only lead the coalition to 133 parliamentary seats, seven short of Abdullah's achievement in 2008.

While not giving his final verdict on Najib, Mahathir (left) said Najib might face some criticism and rejection from within Umno.

"Of course, the people will question his capacity and his strategies," Mahathir added.

"Constitutionally, he remains as the head of government as long as Umno supports him," Mahathir added.

Mahathir said that he had campaigned for the Najib administration as well, with the belief that they would do better than 2008, though he did not expect BN to obtain a two-thirds majority.

'BN must learn from its mistakes'

He warned that BN must learn from its mistakes in the 2013 polls in the next election.

"This can become worse if BN doesn't learn from its mistakes," he stressed.

He, however, appeared apprehensive about the notion of DAP joining hands with BN to represent the Chinese in the government since MCA has decided not to take up government posts.

"That's up to Umno and DAP, whether they want to participate in the government. But I don't think DAP will, they have always projected MCA as Umno lackeys, now they will be seen as one if they join," he noted.

"DAP is a party that will always want to be in a position of dominance," he added.
 
Last edited:

oldjunkee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Kong Jeow Weh NAJIB!!

Malaysia GE13: Najib vows to be PM for all Malaysians
Straits Times-11 hours ago
Mr Najib Razak (right) reading his oath declaration in front of King Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah as he was sworn in for his second term as ...
 
Top