• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Welcome to NZ where TREES are more important than CITIZENS

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
66,137
Points
113
printLogo.png


Six giant pohutukawa trees saved

By Mathew Dearnaley
3:18 PM Friday Feb 20, 2015
527695925_220x147.jpg

Photo / File / Thinkstock


Auckland Transport directors have decided unanimously to save six giant pohutukawa trees their staff wanted cut down to provide extra traffic space at Western Springs.

It follows impassioned pleas from supporters of the 81-year-old trees at an open session of the transport board this afternoon. The board then shut its doors to decide whether to accept or reject a recommendation from council planning commissioners that the trees get the chop.

A decision to axe the trees would have started the clock on 15 working days for appeals to the Environment Court, which campaigners said would have been inevitable unless the recommendation was tossed out.

But the board's communication general manager, Wally Thomas, announced his board had decided unanimously to reject the commissioners' recommendation.

Defenders of the trees, under the Twitter handle Six Pohutukawa, tweeted minutes after the decision: "We are saved! Friends, we are such happy treets! Everyone breathe in - we have oxygen to spare! THANK YOU @AklTransport for hearing us!"

About 60 of the tree supporters had earlier this afternoon packed the board's public gallery in the HSBC Tower on Queen St as Waitemata Local Board chairman Shale Chambers warned of the risk to its reputation if it ignored community concerns.

Although his community board supported trimming the trees to provide clearance above a widened roadway, as part of an motorway interchange upgrade, he said it had taken the "unprecedented" step of opposing their removal.

"These notable, majestic, heritage trees provide a range of environmental services and amenity values," he said.

"They soften the impacts of the roading infrastructure, providing shade and protection, as well as being an iconic inner-city landscape feature in their own right."

He understood the trees, which extended 550 metres along Great North Rd, were planted on Arbor Day in 1934 in association with the development of Chamberlain Golf Course.

"Now over 80 years old, they have become a spectacular stand of native trees along the southern edge, forming a welcoming boulevard as intended at the time of planting."

Mr Chambers elicited gasps from the public gallery when he said a petition of 1475 signatures was among 54 submissions to the planning commissions ruled invalid by Auckland Council because of an incorrect reference number on submission forms, leaving just 10 to have been considered at a hearing in November.

Pohutakawa Savers representative Jolisa Gracewood spoke of the diversity of supporters including the Tree Council, tangata whenua and MPs from both sides of Parliament concerned about what would be a monumental mistake that would "leave a hole in the skyline for generations to come."

Auckland Transport's chief development officer Greg Edmonds said that if removing the trees could be avoided while achieving the objective of improving the transport network for general traffic, buses, bikes and pedestrians, "we would prefer that option" - but that was found not to be possible.

He was challenged from the public gallery on a statement that an alternative option which would save the trees would allow only one left-turning lane, before board chairman Lester Levy said his directors were able to make up their own minds without such interjections.

Dr Levy, who opened the meeting by noting the irony of its being held in the board's Kauri Room, promised those present that a decision would be reached behind closed doors before 5pm.

By Mathew Dearnaley
- NZ Herald

Copyright ©2015, APN New Zealand Limited

 
Likewise in Sinkieland. Don't believe ask Gecko.
 
At least Kiwis treasure their local trees unlike PAP treasure foreign talents

Fuck PAP!!!!!
 
Fact - PAP plants more trees than many other government

Fuck WP!!!!!

At least Kiwis treasure their local trees unlike PAP treasure foreign talents

Fuck PAP!!!!!
 
Dun bull lah SG NEA also takes care of its trees too. If not where got so many in the middle of the streets?
 
Our PAP SG love trees more by spending 65 mil a year maintaining fake trees than caring about citizens!!!
 
Trees are sacred. They produce oxygen, provide natural resources and do not pollute the environment. They do not start wars.

Some trees stand tall long after humans live out their miserable allotted brief lifespan.
 
Back
Top