• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

we might be smallest but pinky is the biggest in the world!

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
15,744
Points
83
Investopedia reported the following were the highest paid leaders in 2010:

1. Lee Hsien Loong (Singapore): $2,183,516
2. Donald Tsang (Hong Kong): $513,245
3. Raila Odinga (Kenya): $427,886
4. Barack Obama (United States): $400,000
5. Nicolas Sarkozy (France): $302,435
6. Stephen Harper (Canada): $296,400
7. Mary McAleese (Ireland): $287,900
8. Julia Gillard (Australia): $286,752
9. Angela Merkel (Germany): $283,608
10. Yoshihiko Noda (Japan): $273,676

yep! he's lumpar 1. invincible!
 
Lee Hsien Loong (Singapore) USD$2,200,000
Hu Jintao ( China ) USD$10,633

Ma Ying-Jeou ( Taiwan ) USD184,000


Hu Jintao must surely take home much more then he declared.
 
if comparison of living costs, pinky's pay could be relatively much much higher. and don't forget the perks they have. merzs are provided free. travel in lst class and free holidays trips and many more.

better train your kids to be the next future PM or president of sg.
 
Lee Hsien Loong (Singapore) USD$2,200,000
Hu Jintao ( China ) USD$10,633

Ma Ying-Jeou ( Taiwan ) USD184,000


Hu Jintao must surely take home much more then he declared.


All corrupted except LHL, for he takes home the most & he is 'whiter' than the rest.:D
 
All corrupted except LHL, for he takes home the most & he is 'whiter' than the rest.:D

communal corruption is NOT corruption. corruption has taken a new meaning. it's called lesser greed.
 
if comparison of living costs, pinky's pay could be relatively much much higher. and don't forget the perks they have. merzs are provided free. travel in lst class and free holidays trips and many more.

better train your kids to be the next future PM or president of sg.

You're not naive enough to believe that we're living in a meritocracy do you? What's betterer is to give away your kids to Lee Kuan Yew and his cronies for adoption. :)
 
too bad there are no proper opposition to threaten them, therefore they do what they like. we have to lay the blame to the people.
 
You're not naive enough to believe that we're living in a meritocracy do you? What's betterer is to give away your kids to Lee Kuan Yew and his cronies for adoption. :)
But his kids are not of royal blood, at most can be another yesman.
 
there is a very important and missed query. why didn't lau lee retire? he's already almost there. by being still around has already cast doubt about the authencity to serve at that kind of advance age. we have had a teresa hsu who's personfication of guanyin. do we really need a male version guanyew?
 
Last edited:
the new paytable like let out emeritus senile minitoot and mental minitoot. are they exempted from the cut?
 
Last edited:
I wonder why Japan's PM isn't paid more. Japan has a lower homicide rate than Sinkieland, more millionaires and billionaires, better food and culture; all these without importing hordes of foreign talent or harbouring illicit funds. And it's a country of circa 128 million people. Sinkieland? 5.1 million. Managing Singapore is like managing Toys 'r' us :rolleyes:
 
I wonder why Japan's PM isn't paid more. Japan has a lower homicide rate than Sinkieland, more millionaires and billionaires, better food and culture; all these without importing hordes of foreign talent or harbouring illicit funds. And it's a country of circa 128 million people. Sinkieland? 5.1 million. Managing Singapore is like managing Toys 'r' us :rolleyes:

If compare like that 128 million to 5.1 million then PM LHL should only been paid 4% of Japan leader.
 
it seems that over-practicality has taken over from serving from the heart or the passion to serve like the lst generation of the gov.

grace fu had honestly voiced her concern about lower ministerial pay. she stressed on "it might turn away good people to serve..." how could good people serve when there is an obscene pay dangling infront of them?

b4 the last GE, paps had cooked up many reasons to endorse they million $ pays. they were quite deaf to the cries and dissatistfaction of the people. why now they decide to be so obliging? if they hadn't lost a GRC and a single ward, do u think they would even reduce a cent or increase their pays further?

think people, think!

they might be trying to appease the voters now and pretending to hear the bad things n compromise. come next GE with many got conned and start voting them, it would definitely be payback time with a vengeance!
 
You think people like Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and Chee SJ and Gomez want to be MPs and Ministers because they want to serve the people? My big foot! You wait until they become ministers or MPs themselves. I don't think they can get even half the work done!
 
You think people like Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and Chee SJ and Gomez want to be MPs and Ministers because they want to serve the people? My big foot! You wait until they become ministers or MPs themselves. I don't think they can get even half the work done!

[video=youtube;AvqE_xAN1is]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvqE_xAN1is[/video]
 
You think people like Low Thia Kiang, Sylvia Lim and Chee SJ and Gomez want to be MPs and Ministers because they want to serve the people? My big foot! You wait until they become ministers or MPs themselves. I don't think they can get even half the work done!

that is precisely what's happening now when they endorse obscene pays. people are suspicious whether those jokers are there to serve or there because of the pay. it sort of in a way lost much of the respect attached to a higher honorable job.

even now when the opps are fighting relentlessly to get themsleves into parleement, the voters are also wondering are they really there for them or are they really there for the pays.
 
that is precisely what's happening now when they endorse obscene pays. people are suspicious whether those jokers are there to serve or there because of the pay. it sort of in a way lost much of the respect attached to a higher honorable job.

even now when the opps are fighting relentlessly to get themsleves into parleement, the voters are also wondering are they really there for them or are they really there for the pays.

That's Kuan Yew's legacy. :D
 
Back
Top