There may some truth about arranged marriage. LHL 's second marriage produces all healthy normal children.
That is why LKY said you don't marry the woman you love, rather you love the woman you marry.
There may some truth about arranged marriage. LHL 's second marriage produces all healthy normal children.
Hey LIAR mudlander snake, it's not interpretation but your exact own words calling people FOOLS.
I can't bring myself down to your level. You are very experienced at that level.
Why the fuck are you two morons hijacking the thread?
Can you two meet in person at some parking lot and fight it out like real men?
Mr JohnTan aka the Elite-Handsome-Face ( I have to bite my tongue on the word handsome ... ),
I have contributed constructively to your thread, decrying the plight of the william syndrome child and condemning the actions of the woman who despised Elaine Chan because of her son.
I am no intention of hijacking your thread. It is a good thread highlighting the plight of the disadvantaged children in Singapore, especially when we set aside Purple Day yesterday to remembering them.
I hope you will have sympathy for these children and their parents. Please extend your help and support to Elaine Chan.
Mr JohnTan aka the Elite-Handsome-Face ( I have to bite my tongue on the word handsome ... ),
I have contributed constructively to your thread, decrying the plight of the william syndrome child and condemning the actions of the woman who despised Elaine Chan because of her son.
I am no intention of hijacking your thread. It is a good thread highlighting the plight of the disadvantaged children in Singapore, especially when we set aside Purple Day yesterday to remembering them.
I hope you will have sympathy for these children and their parents. Please extend your help and support to Elaine Chan.
Looks like you are a half past six investigator again as far as any investigation on me is concerned. Why so slipshod? What you suggested is already my previous signature and it was Michelle Obama not Hillary who said it then. And most important is you missed out the post that I highlighted this nice phrase and gave credit to Michelle Obama for it. I demand an apology from you for this insinuation that you made of me. Or are you like the mudlanders Wunderfool etc who shamelessly slandered me and can expect no apology from them despite demand?
Pardon me for interrupting, but I'm suddenly inspired to suggest a new forum signature for you, i.e. two YouTube links:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCsM3iklq8Q
[video=youtube;nCsM3iklq8Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCsM3iklq8Q[/video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9xDtWLTgKY
[video=youtube;q9xDtWLTgKY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9xDtWLTgKY[/video]
Also, instead of calling you "ginfreely", may I call you "Hillary"? :p :o
Believe it or not, I had actually bothered to draft quite a long reply last week, but decided not to post it, since you refrained from posting for some days, so I decided to let this issue slide.No reply from flatearther after one week? OK confirm flatearther is in the same class as shameless mudlanders who think it's their birthright to slander and bully people.
Yes, you're right; I remember seeing it before.What you suggested is already my previous signature...
Yes, I'm also aware of that.... and it was Michelle Obama not Hillary who said it then.
Although I don't remember seeing that, I also believe you when you say you "gave credit to Michelle Obama for it".And most important is you missed out the post that I highlighted this nice phrase and gave credit to Michelle Obama for it.
But if you were/are under the impression that I was insinuating that you "stole" the "When they go low, we go high" phrase (or any other variation of it) from anyone (whether from Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton or anyone else), then I'm afraid you misunderstood my intention, simply because my only intention was to suggest a new forum signature for you that includes the two YouTube links I posted, in addition to your old signature that included that "nice phrase".I demand an apology from you for this insinuation that you made of me.
1. No, I'm not like Wunderfool, who seems to have also misunderstood my intention.Or are you like the mudlanders Wunderfool etc who shamelessly slandered me and can expect no apology from them despite demand?
I am 100% sure that you have wrongly/wrongfully accused certain members of being clones of that original member (or group of members/clones) who slandered you (probably a long time ago, I'm guessing), which is probably the main reason those wronged members are so irritated by you.Looks like you are a half past six investigator again as far as any investigation on me is concerned. Why so slipshod?
Believe it or not, I had actually bothered to draft quite a long reply last week, but decided not to post it, since you refrained from posting for some days, so I decided to let this issue slide.
But since you seem to really want me to reply, here you go:
Yes, you're right; I remember seeing it before.
Yes, I'm also aware of that.
Although I don't remember seeing that, I also believe you when you say you "gave credit to Michelle Obama for it".
But if you were/are under the impression that I was insinuating that you "stole" the "When they go low, we go high" phrase (or any other variation of it) from anyone (whether from Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton or anyone else), then I'm afraid you misunderstood my intention, simply because my only intention was to suggest a new forum signature for you that includes the two YouTube links I posted, in addition to your old signature that included that "nice phrase".
That still does not mean I'm accusing you of "stealing" it from anyone; I just thought it might be a good idea for you to promote Hillary Clinton by including those two links in your forum signature.
In fact, including those two links would also prove that you did not steal that "nice phrase" from her/them (just in case anyone accuses you of "stealing"), right?
As for asking whether I may call you "Hillary", that was simply because I suddenly realized it rhymes with "ginfreely", so I just felt like calling you "Hillary" at that time. :o
I honestly don't think I've done anything wrong, so even if I were to say "sorry" now, you would think I'm being sarcastic, right?
1. No, I'm not like Wunderfool, who seems to have also misunderstood my intention.
2. I honestly don't know if Wunderfool is a Malaysian.
3. As for the original sammyboy.com member (or group of members/clones) who slandered you (and that's if they really did slander you) in some old posts/threads, I honestly have no idea who they are because I've never seen those old posts/threads before, so if you would like me to read those old posts/threads, please post their links or PM me.
I am 100% sure that you have wrongly/wrongfully accused certain members of being clones of that original member (or group of members/clones) who slandered you (probably a long time ago, I'm guessing), which is probably the main reason those wronged members are so irritated by you.
So once again, if you don't mind letting me know the links to those initial posts/threads in which you were truly the victim, I would also not mind making the effort (which might last for more than a few days or even weeks) to help you ascertain whether the currently active members that you suspect to be clones of your original slanderer (or slanderers) are truly his (or her/their) clones.