Use Huawei case in this Rus-Ukr conflict of interest.... both case similar based on home security threat reason...
Fight a court case is based where and how the judges pick the winner from the losers.... and in between the witness go to jail if he lied....
So every new case is recorded and file as a theory to guide judges solve case problem based on similar cases were fought before.... that's how law works... ask Sham the snake...
So what Russia can do is write a Act law quickly and impose it. Then whoever breach this new Act law will be taken to court in Russia court and international court...
Then can shamed NATO as a terrorist organisation too... it is your call and they have to take you to court to clear their name... once this is inforce can subpoena the NATO chief or executive to court. If he is failed to appear in court for the hearing he can be under house arrest in any airport in the world like Huawei case.... until case is settled.... this is also sanction in another form.... pass....
The reason of arrest is similar... home security reason of the country under threat.... 无中生有计 applied settle later..... this will be a game changer no need weapon war but court war...
This will stall Ukraine membership application until court case is settled and war suspended....
So arrest the NATO chief make sense without firing a single bullet in this trading war.... you reckon... this is a trading war... NATO recruiting new member but having conflict of interest with Russia home security threat issue as in Huawei case...
Now lagi best.... can house arrest PM or President of any country under the Act for home security reason for supporting a terrorist company NATO to go to war for trading... recruit new members...
Law is interpreted along the way with new case filed for court proceedings...
Tioboh... Psst... if you like my bullshit click the like button...
Fight a court case is based where and how the judges pick the winner from the losers.... and in between the witness go to jail if he lied....
So every new case is recorded and file as a theory to guide judges solve case problem based on similar cases were fought before.... that's how law works... ask Sham the snake...
So what Russia can do is write a Act law quickly and impose it. Then whoever breach this new Act law will be taken to court in Russia court and international court...
Then can shamed NATO as a terrorist organisation too... it is your call and they have to take you to court to clear their name... once this is inforce can subpoena the NATO chief or executive to court. If he is failed to appear in court for the hearing he can be under house arrest in any airport in the world like Huawei case.... until case is settled.... this is also sanction in another form.... pass....
The reason of arrest is similar... home security reason of the country under threat.... 无中生有计 applied settle later..... this will be a game changer no need weapon war but court war...
This will stall Ukraine membership application until court case is settled and war suspended....
So arrest the NATO chief make sense without firing a single bullet in this trading war.... you reckon... this is a trading war... NATO recruiting new member but having conflict of interest with Russia home security threat issue as in Huawei case...
Now lagi best.... can house arrest PM or President of any country under the Act for home security reason for supporting a terrorist company NATO to go to war for trading... recruit new members...
Law is interpreted along the way with new case filed for court proceedings...
Tioboh... Psst... if you like my bullshit click the like button...
