As the Ukraine war drags on, I am reminded of the late Yale University professor Nicholas Spykman’s assertion that “whoever rules the Rimland commands Eurasia, and whoever rules Eurasia controls the destinies of the world”.
Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 article “A Geostrategy for Eurasia” is also essential reading for anyone wanting to understand US policy on Europe. The former US national security adviser noted that “Eurasia accounts for 75 per cent of the world’s population, 60 per cent of its GNP [gross national product], and 75 per cent of its energy resources. Collectively, Eurasia’s potential power overshadows even America’s.”
Even though the United States is protected in the east by the Atlantic Ocean and in the west by the Pacific, the mainstream realist American view followed the Spykman line that control of the rimland – the coastal lands that surround the Eurasian land mass – would mean command of Eurasia. This explains why the American leadership in Nato is so focused on Ukraine.
Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine was the US cold warrior’s dream outcome. Western Europe had been drifting away from American influence as it came to depend more on cheap Russian energy. The Ukraine war and damage to the Nord Stream gas pipelines mean Europe once again depends solely on the American defence umbrella and is therefore subject to US strategic direction.
Spending time in Europe last week made me realise how emotions are clouding logic in the debate over the Ukraine war.
More at GO FIND IT YOURSELVES
