• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Two challenges against Section 377A to be heard in court together

KangTao

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Updated: 10/10/2013 20:42 | By Channel NewsAsia

Two challenges against Section 377A to be heard in court together

ADDFDE51B8E0BD8B476D37E3A1E4E2.jpg


SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal has allowed two challenges against Section 377A of the Penal Code, which criminalises sex between men, to be heard together.

The first case involves Mr Tan Eng Hong, who was caught having oral sex in a shopping mall toilet with another man.

He was originally charged under Section 377A, though the charge was later changed to committing an obscene act in a public place.

Mr Tan was the first to fight the law in 2010, but his challenge was dismissed earlier this month.

Separately, a similar challenge had been mounted by a couple -- Mr Gary Lim Meng Suang and Mr Kenneth Chee Mun-Leon.

Lawyer M Ravi, who represented Mr Tan argued that the move to have the cases heard together is to prevent the same questions of law and constitutional issues from being tried on separate occasions with potentially different results.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the issues in both cases are essentially the same, and should be heard together. - CNA/nd

 
Top