- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 24,581
- Points
- 0
What's wrong with having a bitch in the White House? The entire country has gone to the dogs anyway.
what a total lack of human wisdom!!!! or you have dog wisdom???
What's wrong with having a bitch in the White House? The entire country has gone to the dogs anyway.
Thanks. I just want hillary to lose no matter what.
without a nomination, confirm 0% chance to presidency.
so it is always better to have a nomination..
Me too, but not because I support/like him, but because the reality is that the current ground swell, like you said:i'm calling for trump.
is pointing to a new Republican-controlled US government, led by a Trump Administration, starting early next year, unless Trump unexpectedly dies....trump will draw the non-partisan, independent, and libertarian votes which typically comprise 20% of total votes. swing votes from this camp of misfits and fence-sitters will be huge for trump, as turncoat democrats may also vote for him, especially those hardcore bernie supporters who hate the dem establishment and washington insiders. among political nut cases here, "enemy of my enemy is my friend" and they would either abstain from voting or cast their lot with a so called "conservative" outsider. i truly think when it comes down to the final race between trump and hillary, trump has a chance as pubs and independents gel around the presumptive nominee and negative stories start to swirl around hillary, especially when she slept through benghazi, and her state department email fiasco begins to become an albatross around her neck.
If Donald Trump really becomes the POTUS in January next year, he will be 70 going on 71, thus breaking Ronald Reagan's record as the oldest man to be inaugurated as the POTUS in 1981:Namaste everybody
This could very well spell the beginning of the end of mankind.
wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_age#Lis t_of_Presidents
wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_America_Great_Again
It will be quickly followed by at least four key elections in 2017/18:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Chief_Executive_election,_2017
wikipedia.org/wiki/French_presidential_election,_2017
wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_German_federal_election
wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_presidential_election,_2018
Will these elections signal a new wave of wars around the world (even if they are not considered as "World War Three"), just like the wars that started during the 1980s?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_1945–89#1980–1989
or something even worse? :(
I also noticed that since the Vietnam War started in the mid-1950s, it seems that whenever the US military physically invades another country, it's during the tenure of a Republican President.
If a pro-immigration Democrat President were to be elected, it would be difficult for him/her to approve the US military to invade Iran, because that might offend the Shia Muslims in the US: