Tony Tan: Singaporeans first, Foreigners second, lastly the rest (Singaporeans)

sense

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Messages
1,463
Points
48
This fellow is making the m&d muddier.

A simple analysis of what he said is his re-emphasis that:
Tier 1. Some Singaporeans will be considered first, but
Tier 2. that will be followed by Foreigners and then,
Tier 3. and then the rest of the Singaporeans.

The real question that we really want to know is what's the percentage of each Tier, 5%, 5%, 90%?

stock-photo-layered-pyramid-chart-with-three-levels-in-red-yellow-green-73983190.jpg


Singaporeans first, not Singaporeans only

Higher education: Don't close door to foreigners, says Tony Tan

by Tan Weizhen
04:45 AM Jul 20, 2011
SINGAPORE - Presidential hopeful Tony Tan - who is synonymous with the growth of the Republic's university sector - has come out to make clear his stance on the universities' recruitment of foreign students, which has been a subject of discussion as the Presidential race heats up.

Speaking at a Singapore Management University (SMU) lecture yesterday, Dr Tan said: "I have been asked more than once in recent weeks whether I favour a 'Singaporeans first' policy in higher education. I do.

"But 'Singaporeans first' is different from saying 'Singaporeans only'. Singapore is an international city and it would be a grave mistake to close our doors."

Dr Tan, who was a former Deputy Prime Minister, spent seven out of his 19 years in the Cabinet helming the education portfolio. He was also the Minister-in-charge of the university sector for more than two decades.

Dr Tan's involvement in the higher education sector - in particular, his push for the globalisation of the universities - has been discussed online in various forums as well as on his Facebook page. One Facebook user, for instance, criticised Dr Tan's "pro-foreign talent policy" which he instituted at the universities.

Dr Tan said yesterday: "I understand that some people believe that our higher education sector should only educate Singaporeans. In addition to the inherent problems of protectionism, closing our doors would limit the talented individuals who presently contribute much to Singapore."

He added: "Closing our doors would also restrict our ability to engage in the kind of collaborative research that has put Singapore universities in the very top ranks of universities in the world."

Dr Tan stressed that the country's primary responsibility is to Singaporeans.

The Government should "continue to monitor carefully the proportion of foreign students in our educational institutions to ensure that the proportion matches the present and future needs of the country, and that Singaporeans are the main beneficiaries of our education policy", he said.

In the 1980s, Dr Tan, who was the Education Minister then, had spoken out against the graduate mothers' scheme, which gives priority to children of graduate mothers during school registration. The unpopular scheme was ultimately scrapped.

Speaking to reporters after the SMU event, Dr Tan explained his stance: "I looked at the reasons why it was launched, and I felt it was not fulfilling its purpose. It was disadvantaging unfairly certain segments of our children … that was why I decided to change course."

On hindsight, Dr Tan said the decision to scrap the scheme was right. But he urged people to move on.

"The point is one looks at the issue when one has the authority to do something about it. The important thing is that when you have the authority, you should exercise it wisely."

And whether or not he is elected as President, Dr Tan's involvement with the education sector looks set to continue.

During the Q&A session after his lecture, Dr Tan - who chairs the International Academic Advisory Panel - was asked what the President can do for education in Singapore.

Dr Tan replied that the President can make an impact in schools through his patronage and interaction with principals, teachers and students.

He added: "While the President doesn't have executive authority, through his influence, through the areas he concentrates on, through the causes he champions, he can make a great impact in the area of education."
 
Why is someone who is considered to be out of the government is speaking like an Education Minister, whereas, we already paying for one?

TANcho man is talking like G Orwell "Animal Farm"

1.Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
2.Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
3.No animal shall wear clothes.
4.No animal shall sleep in a bed.
5.No animal shall drink alcohol.
6.No animal shall kill any other animal.
7.All animals are equal.

MIW changed the rules to:
1.No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.
2.No animal shall drink alcohol to excess.
3.No animal shall kill any other animal without cause.

Eventually the laws are replaced with "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others", and "Four legs good, two legs better!"

:p
 
Why is someone who is considered to be out of the government is speaking like an Education Minister, whereas, we already paying for one?

TANcho man is talking like G Orwell "Animal Farm"

1.Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
2.Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
3.No animal shall wear clothes.
4.No animal shall sleep in a bed.
5.No animal shall drink alcohol.
6.No animal shall kill any other animal.
7.All animals are equal.

MIW changed the rules to:
1.No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.
2.No animal shall drink alcohol to excess.
3.No animal shall kill any other animal without cause.

Eventually the laws are replaced with "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others", and "Four legs good, two legs better!"

:p


hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. cannot believe any farts from the whitehair sheep.
3. a sheep is always some sheep regardless in office or what.
4. what a big yawn!
 
hi there
......
4. what a big yawn!

Bro, I agreed on this big yawn man!! Nothing is new coming out from this pappy govt. Hear we have so many people complaining abt the transport system, FTs, housing, overcrowding etc etc... But there, the whole govt is trying to "justify" all these problems. Time and time again, some ministers will come out to say why all the "problems" is a must.

Honestly, the pappy govt must continue to do these "justification". So come 2016, it will be another watershed election.

I am giving up on this govt liao!!
!&!!
 
Fuck this back combed white hair in ugly high waisted pants with thick glasses idiot.

This MF gambler is worst than a thief staking our money in high risk investments.

His failed educational policies had lead to many unprecedented national disasters.

Roast him in heaven and feed him to the scavengers.
 
Back
Top