Tony Tan and his Ang Mo in laws

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,134
Points
83
Patrick is married to an Ang Mo and so is his daughter. With 2 ang mos in the family, I wonder what their though process would be and that of their parents for having a President with 35% of the votes.

The US avoids it by having the primaries and the electoral college albeit they did have minority Presidents in the past but a few points off 50%. Many countries have similar mechanisms such as runs-offs to ensure that a mandate is indeed a mandate of the people. The Westminster system avoids it by having party caucus or the like to elect the leader.

For such a super smart country, how did a man with only 35% of the popular vote end up as the President.
 
You also forgot about the Aussie system where preference voting is used as well.
 
Sure gonna look like with a stronger Opp in the system, the trend is for future PEs to be more partisan.
 
Patrick is married to an Ang Mo and so is his daughter. With 2 ang mos in the family, I wonder what their though process would be and that of their parents for having a President with 35% of the votes.

The US avoids it by having the primaries and the electoral college albeit they did have minority Presidents in the past but a few points off 50%. Many countries have similar mechanisms such as runs-offs to ensure that a mandate is indeed a mandate of the people. The Westminster system avoids it by having party caucus or the like to elect the leader.

For such a super smart country, how did a man with only 35% of the popular vote end up as the President.



imagine the 2 Angmohs having an affair ?????
 
2i9p7ba.jpg


see the resemblance?
 
You also forgot about the Aussie system where preference voting is used as well.


Still, it does not stop us having a hung parliament.
But I still prefer the proportional system used in the NZ where it is more transparent.

Aussies are still wondering how Labor got in when they voted Green. : :confused:




Patrick is married to an Ang Mo and so is his daughter. With 2 ang mos in the family, I wonder what their though process would be and that of their parents for having a President with 35% of the votes.

The US avoids it by having the primaries and the electoral college albeit they did have minority Presidents in the past but a few points off 50%. Many countries have similar mechanisms such as runs-offs to ensure that a mandate is indeed a mandate of the people. The Westminster system avoids it by having party caucus or the like to elect the leader.

For such a super smart country, how did a man with only 35% of the popular vote end up as the President.


How does a person who "received" RESERVE$ come on board the "giving" end of the RESERVE$.
Is this not a conflict of interest.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top