• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tokyo Boycotts Google Korea Maps

AIpha

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
251
Points
0

Tokyo Boycotts Google Korea Maps

[email protected] / Sep. 30, 2013 11:20 KST

The Japanese government has instructed regional government and state organizations not to use the Korean version of Google maps due to the labeling of Dokdo, to which Tokyo has flimsy territorial claim.

The Korean version of Google maps lists the Korean islets as "Dokdo" but not by the name the Japanese have for them.

According to the Tokyo Shimbun on Saturday, the central government in a notice to regional governments and national universities said Google maps contain names that are "not in line" with Tokyo's official position. The Japanese version of Google maps labels Dokdo with the Japanese name of "Takeshima."

The English version bizarrely calls them "Liancourt Rocks," a hangover from even older colonial ventures.

In a similar bind, Google maps try to please all sides by calling a group of islands disputed between Japan and China by their Japanese name of Senkaku in Japan and their Chinese name of Diaoyu in China.

Meanwhile, Japanese Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera continued a campaign by the rightwing Abe administration to loosen the country’s pacifist postwar constitution. Onodera said the country’s military need be able to "attack enemy bases," according to the Yomiuri Shimbun on Saturday.

Onodera told a seminar that it would be too late to defend the country if "multiple missiles are fired" at Japan, arguing that the constitution allows attacks on enemy bases. He apparently wants Japan to be capable of launching pre-emptive strikes against North Korean military installations.

The issue will be discussed at the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee Meeting on Thursday.

Japan does not own mid-range attack missiles as its postwar constitution prohibits any hostile actions.


 
Back
Top