• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Those who agree/disagree with Ah Chan, KEE CHUI!!!

Those who agree/disagree with Ah Chan, KEE CHUI!!!

  • No- Kee Chui. Wjhat Ah Chan Say is Wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Online users express anger towards Chan Chun Sing over his remarks of calling people “idiots” and “disgraceful”
4 MIN READ
18
chan-chun-sing-1.png

Last week, Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing conducted a closed-door meeting with a group of business leaders organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI).
In the meeting, he addressed a number of issues including people’s behaviour of panic buying and hoarding essential items in Singapore. He noted that this behaviour “has long term implications” on the country’s international standing.
Mr Chan was referring to incident of Singaporeans clearing out supermarket shelves as they stock up on rice, instant noodles, hand sanitisers and more after the country’s Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) level was raised to orange as the coronavirus outbreak continued to escalate.
Describing the entire thing as “xia suay” or “disgraceful”, Mr Chan said, “We embarrass ourselves, disgraceful, we disgrace ourselves.”
Mr Chan added that he was “ashamed” at the behaviour of some Singaporeans who were stocking up on so-called essential items in fear that the country would run out due to supply chains being affected by the global outbreak.
Arizona


moxtv-logo-big.svg

Copy video url
Play / Pause
Mute / Unmute
Report a problem
Language
Mox Player


Mr Chan then referred to the videos and photos circulating online showing people buying food and things like wet wipes in bulk, resulting to empty shelves at various stores.
He went on to say that he was reaching the limit of his patience, “cannot tahan”, and wanted to “scold people” for their behaviour.
He also noted his incredulity of Singaporeans panic buying not only food but also things like toilet paper.
He lamented, “No paper, water also can. So why do we behave so idiotically?”
He also went on to also complain about “selfish idiots” who bought up alcohol swabs and use them to “clean tables”. Mr Chan emphasised that alcohol swabs are for medical purposes, like for a diabetic person to use to clean their skin before checking their blood sugar level or injecting insulin.
Mr Chan then narrowed in on how the behaviour of Singaporeans during this time could affect the country’s standing on a global level.
He added when the society starts to panic, suppliers will use that opportunity to raise prices.
He said, “Already got people trying to raise the price. Then you all behave like idiots, the foreign supplier lagi raise their price.”
Mr Chan reiterated, “So some of us, just a small group behaving like idiots will kill all of us. It will kill our current price negotiation strategy, it will kill our future business opportunity.”
The minister went on, “Every country can behave like idiots, Singaporeans must not behave like idiots. Then we behave properly, then we show the world how different we can be. Then people will have confidence.”
Mr Chan then warned his audience, “If we continue to behave like that, the virus won’t kill us. Our own behaviour will kill ourselves.”
Upon reading Mr Chan’s remarks on the public’s behaviour, many netizens expressed their anger on the choice of words he used at the meeting.
Penning their thoughts on the Facebook page of TOC, they said that they are ashamed of him for making such a speech as it was the people who voted for him.
Calling Mr Chan “xia suay” himself, some said that he has “zero tact” as only in Singapore that a politician can say such things and get away with it, adding that he lacks “decency”.
comment3-2-650x160.jpg
comment4-2-650x189.jpg
comment5-2-650x214.jpg
comment6-3-650x153.jpg
comment7-3-650x165.jpg
comment8-3-650x286.jpg

comment2-2-650x290.jpg

Min Zheng called the Minister “rude and crude in how he dissed Singaporeans for many things from wanting masks to sanitisers”. As such, the online user said that Mr Chan came across as someone who is “militant, impatient, arrogant and lacking in empathy”. Although the Facebook user agrees that it’s not right for people to stockpile items, but Mr Chan should have addressed the issues “calmly and with some empathy” given that he is a senior minister.
“How could he as a Minister talk about our people in such a patronising manner and with an audience at an official meeting?” the netizen asked.
comment1-2-650x337.jpg

A bunch of online users also pointed out that people started stockpiling items because they have “lost confidence in the government” as they tend to contradict their words.
As an example, netizens explained that the government had previously said that there’s no use of panic buying as there are enough masks in the country for the people, but Mr Chan is now saying that the amount of masks is insufficient.
comment12-1-650x170.jpg
comment14-1-650x250.jpg
comment15-650x256.jpg
comment16-650x311.jpg
comment17-650x123.jpg

comment11-3-650x323.jpg

A small number of online users also mocked Mr Chan for his poor grasp of the English language. They said that it’s fine to speak in such a way to friends and family, but “as a leader this is utterly unacceptable”.
Jeremiah Tay suggested that Mr Chan should get his “script writers to prepare the scripts” when he speaks in public the next time.
comment9-3-650x273.jpg

comment10-3-650x232.jpg

comment13-1-650x145.jpg

Share this:
Online users express anger towards Chan Chun Sing over his remarks of calling people “idiots” and “disgraceful”
4 MIN READ
18

chan-chun-sing-1.png
Last week, Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing conducted a closed-door meeting with a group of business leaders organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI).
In the meeting, he addressed a number of issues including people’s behaviour of panic buying and hoarding essential items in Singapore. He noted that this behaviour “has long term implications” on the country’s international standing.
Mr Chan was referring to incident of Singaporeans clearing out supermarket shelves as they stock up on rice, instant noodles, hand sanitisers and more after the country’s Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) level was raised to orange as the coronavirus outbreak continued to escalate.
Describing the entire thing as “xia suay” or “disgraceful”, Mr Chan said, “We embarrass ourselves, disgraceful, we disgrace ourselves.”
Mr Chan added that he was “ashamed” at the behaviour of some Singaporeans who were stocking up on so-called essential items in fear that the country would run out due to supply chains being affected by the global outbreak.
Arizona
moxtv-logo-big.svg

Copy video url
Play / Pause
Mute / Unmute
Report a problem
Language
Mox Player
Mr Chan then referred to the videos and photos circulating online showing people buying food and things like wet wipes in bulk, resulting to empty shelves at various stores.
He went on to say that he was reaching the limit of his patience, “cannot tahan”, and wanted to “scold people” for their behaviour.
He also noted his incredulity of Singaporeans panic buying not only food but also things like toilet paper.
He lamented, “No paper, water also can. So why do we behave so idiotically?”
He also went on to also complain about “selfish idiots” who bought up alcohol swabs and use them to “clean tables”. Mr Chan emphasised that alcohol swabs are for medical purposes, like for a diabetic person to use to clean their skin before checking their blood sugar level or injecting insulin.
Mr Chan then narrowed in on how the behaviour of Singaporeans during this time could affect the country’s standing on a global level.
He added when the society starts to panic, suppliers will use that opportunity to raise prices.
He said, “Already got people trying to raise the price. Then you all behave like idiots, the foreign supplier lagi raise their price.”
Mr Chan reiterated, “So some of us, just a small group behaving like idiots will kill all of us. It will kill our current price negotiation strategy, it will kill our future business opportunity.”
The minister went on, “Every country can behave like idiots, Singaporeans must not behave like idiots. Then we behave properly, then we show the world how different we can be. Then people will have confidence.”
Mr Chan then warned his audience, “If we continue to behave like that, the virus won’t kill us. Our own behaviour will kill ourselves.”
Upon reading Mr Chan’s remarks on the public’s behaviour, many netizens expressed their anger on the choice of words he used at the meeting.
Penning their thoughts on the Facebook page of TOC, they said that they are ashamed of him for making such a speech as it was the people who voted for him.
Calling Mr Chan “xia suay” himself, some said that he has “zero tact” as only in Singapore that a politician can say such things and get away with it, adding that he lacks “decency”.
comment3-2-650x160.jpg
comment4-2-650x189.jpg
comment5-2-650x214.jpg
comment6-3-650x153.jpg
comment7-3-650x165.jpg
comment8-3-650x286.jpg

comment2-2-650x290.jpg

Min Zheng called the Minister “rude and crude in how he dissed Singaporeans for many things from wanting masks to sanitisers”. As such, the online user said that Mr Chan came across as someone who is “militant, impatient, arrogant and lacking in empathy”. Although the Facebook user agrees that it’s not right for people to stockpile items, but Mr Chan should have addressed the issues “calmly and with some empathy” given that he is a senior minister.
“How could he as a Minister talk about our people in such a patronising manner and with an audience at an official meeting?” the netizen asked.
comment1-2-650x337.jpg

A bunch of online users also pointed out that people started stockpiling items because they have “lost confidence in the government” as they tend to contradict their words.
As an example, netizens explained that the government had previously said that there’s no use of panic buying as there are enough masks in the country for the people, but Mr Chan is now saying that the amount of masks is insufficient.
comment12-1-650x170.jpg
comment14-1-650x250.jpg
comment15-650x256.jpg
comment16-650x311.jpg
comment17-650x123.jpg

comment11-3-650x323.jpg

A small number of online users also mocked Mr Chan for his poor grasp of the English language. They said that it’s fine to speak in such a way to friends and family, but “as a leader this is utterly unacceptable”.
Jeremiah Tay suggested that Mr Chan should get his “script writers to prepare the scripts” when he speaks in public the next time.
comment9-3-650x273.jpg

comment10-3-650x232.jpg

comment13-1-650x145.jpg

Share this:
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
He went on to say that he was reaching the limit of his patience, “cannot tahan”, and wanted to “scold people” for their behaviour.
KNN wonder when he say wanted to scold people does he mean scold rike a uncle scold uncle or as a leader status to scold I.e. the give order kind KNN
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ah Chan said what he said because there is not enough face masks for the public,...

Government says there is sufficient supply of masks, but Minister Chan says there is “limited stock”
5 MIN READ
0
20200130_ccs_najeer.jpg
Ministers Chan Chun Sing speaking to the media after the Technical Briefing on Wuhan Coronavirus at MCI building on 30 Jan. Photo: Najeer Yusof/TODAY
The current coronavirus outbreak has triggered a shortage of surgical masks around the globe and people scramble to stock up on their personal supplies as a precautionary measure against the virus.
Following news of the increasing number of infected cases of Covid-19 in China and the spread of the virus into Singapore led to a mad dash to pharmacies and supply stores as people started to panic-buy masks and hand sanitizers just days after the first case was detected in the country.
Naturally, the empty shelves and uncertainty over when retailers would get new supplies of masks concerned the public who were trying to stay safe amid the outbreak and increasing number of cases being detected in Singapore.
Image-from-iOS-2-338x450.jpg

At the end of January, after stores ran out of stock of masks, the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) released five million masks from the national stockpile to retailers to help them replenish their stocks. However, even those were snapped up in a matter of hours.
Winter in the Alps


moxtv-logo-big.svg

Copy video url
Play / Pause
Mute / Unmute
Report a problem
Language
Mox Player


In efforts to bring calm, Minister of Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing said at a press conference on 30 January that the country has enough masks for residents if the supply is managed “appropriately”.
Mr Chan said, “Whether we have sufficient masks or not will depend on three factors: How much we have in our physical stockpile, our usage rate, and our resupply quantum and frequency.”
“We will have enough if we manage these three factors appropriately,” he asserted.
The same reassurance was given by the Ministry of Health the week before when it said that there were enough N95 masks in Singapore for the public.
The thing is, the reassurance that government bodies have offered in the public is at odds with what Mr Chan said in a meeting with local business leaders just last week.
In the meeting, organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI), Mr Chan had said that no amount of masks will be adequate if everyone in Singapore starts using it every day.
Mr Chan said that if Singapore follows Hong Kong’s leader where political leaders appear at events wearing a mask, that would cause panic among the people and lead to a severe shortage of masks as everyone would use it “like tissue paper”.
Mr Chan explained, “If every Singaporean uses a surgical mask, one day we will burn five million masks, if not more. Since we don’t know how long we got to fight this war and the supply line has [been] cut already, [we must] conserve the surgical mask to make sure our medical system can still work.”
During the session, Mr Chan spoke about the government’s move to hand out four masks to each of Singapore’s 1.37 million households earlier this month for them to use in case they needed one but are unable to purchase a mask at retailers. Mr Chan explained that the masks were only meant to be used by those who were not feeling well or needed to go to the hospital.
However, the minister pointed out that distributing those five million masks to every household in Singapore meant dipping into and further reducing the country’s “limited stock count”.
So in public, the government is reassuring people that it has sufficient supply of masks in its stockpile for the entire country to use during this difficult and fearful time if managed appropriate, but in a closed-door meeting, Mr Chan’s words signal the opposite.
To wear or not to wear?
The government has been cautioning the public to stay calm and avoid using masks every day, saying that it is only necessary to don a mask if they are feeling unwell.
When distributing the five million masks to every household in Singapore, the government explained that it was not meant to be used every day. Instead, the four masks were given out so that people would have access to them when needed.
In that same press conference on 30 January, Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong advised the public not to wear a mask if they are healthy, adding that they will be better protected by washing their hands regularly with soap and water.
The same was also echoed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a Facebook post on the same day where he said “there is no need to wear a mask if we are well”.
Also, the Health Ministry placed a prominent advertisement on Straits Times on 31 January, telling everyone not to use masks if one is well.
IMG_20200214_170523-450x338.jpg
Snaking queue at Lucky Plaza of people waiting to buy face masks (Photo: Terry Xu)
However, in contrary to the government’s advice, four medical practitioners in Singapore co-signed a letter advising people to wear face masks when they leave home to control the spread of Covid-19.
In the viral letter entitled “Health advisory from senior medical practitioners to Singaporeans”, the doctors pointed out that “as this virus is said to be milder, infected people with no symptoms could transmit the virus to others silently. A certain percentage will developing deadly disease” and warned that temperature screening works less well to identify those infected.
“As they mingle freely and unmasked, more and more people could be infected daily without even knowing it.”, said the practitioners.
The letter went on, “We are advising everyone to wear a mask always when leaving home. If one faces a person and both parties are masked, it is considerably safer, constituting a 2 barrier protection. It may not possible for everyone to get a new surgical mask everyday. We need to find creative solutions. Some people have purchased washable cloth masks, sewed them, constructed them with suitable paper, or tied a scarf to the face. These measures are better than no mask at all.”
Mask shortages around the world
The issue of mask shortages is a concern for many nations right now, especially in places close to China—the country hardest hit by the outbreak—such as Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.
In Macau, the government announced that it would be releasing 20 million masks to its citizens via a rationing system that allows each person to buy a maximum of 10 surgical masks every 10 days at designated pharmacies.
This was announced on 22 January, just as Macau confirmed its first case.
About three weeks later, on 14 February, the Macau Secretary for Social Affairs and Culture Ao Ieong Iu announced that the region would be setting up a production line for masks through a local team. She said, “We hope in the fourth round of the government’s mask rationing, the new production line will be able to provide masks to Macau residents.”
In Hong Kong, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor revealed on 8 February that the government’s internal reserve of masks were down to just one month’s supply, said South China Morning Post. Earlier it was revealed that the government has only 12 million masks left.
Ms Lam announced that the city government has bought 48 million masks and received 17 million more from China in efforts to address the shortage caused by panic over the deadly coronavirus outbreak. Unfortunately, she said that the supplies may not arrive in time.
Ms Lam said, “This shortage is not a unique problem in Hong Kong, but the whole world, [though] especially in our region,” Lam said, pleading for the public’s understanding over the resupply delays.
She added that more staff and volunteers in the correctional service’s factory would increase Hong Kong’s supply from 1.8 million a month to 2.5 million. The extra 700,000 masks will be channelled to outsourced cleaners for free.
Government says there is sufficient supply of masks, but Minister Chan says there is “limited stock”
5 MIN READ
0

20200130_ccs_najeer.jpg

Ministers Chan Chun Sing speaking to the media after the Technical Briefing on Wuhan Coronavirus at MCI building on 30 Jan. Photo: Najeer Yusof/TODAY
The current coronavirus outbreak has triggered a shortage of surgical masks around the globe and people scramble to stock up on their personal supplies as a precautionary measure against the virus.
Following news of the increasing number of infected cases of Covid-19 in China and the spread of the virus into Singapore led to a mad dash to pharmacies and supply stores as people started to panic-buy masks and hand sanitizers just days after the first case was detected in the country.
Naturally, the empty shelves and uncertainty over when retailers would get new supplies of masks concerned the public who were trying to stay safe amid the outbreak and increasing number of cases being detected in Singapore.
Image-from-iOS-2-338x450.jpg
At the end of January, after stores ran out of stock of masks, the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) released five million masks from the national stockpile to retailers to help them replenish their stocks. However, even those were snapped up in a matter of hours.
Winter in the Alps
moxtv-logo-big.svg

Copy video url
Play / Pause
Mute / Unmute
Report a problem
Language
Mox Player
In efforts to bring calm, Minister of Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing said at a press conference on 30 January that the country has enough masks for residents if the supply is managed “appropriately”.
Mr Chan said, “Whether we have sufficient masks or not will depend on three factors: How much we have in our physical stockpile, our usage rate, and our resupply quantum and frequency.”
“We will have enough if we manage these three factors appropriately,” he asserted.
The same reassurance was given by the Ministry of Health the week before when it said that there were enough N95 masks in Singapore for the public.
The thing is, the reassurance that government bodies have offered in the public is at odds with what Mr Chan said in a meeting with local business leaders just last week.
In the meeting, organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI), Mr Chan had said that no amount of masks will be adequate if everyone in Singapore starts using it every day.
Mr Chan said that if Singapore follows Hong Kong’s leader where political leaders appear at events wearing a mask, that would cause panic among the people and lead to a severe shortage of masks as everyone would use it “like tissue paper”.
Mr Chan explained, “If every Singaporean uses a surgical mask, one day we will burn five million masks, if not more. Since we don’t know how long we got to fight this war and the supply line has [been] cut already, [we must] conserve the surgical mask to make sure our medical system can still work.”
During the session, Mr Chan spoke about the government’s move to hand out four masks to each of Singapore’s 1.37 million households earlier this month for them to use in case they needed one but are unable to purchase a mask at retailers. Mr Chan explained that the masks were only meant to be used by those who were not feeling well or needed to go to the hospital.
However, the minister pointed out that distributing those five million masks to every household in Singapore meant dipping into and further reducing the country’s “limited stock count”.
So in public, the government is reassuring people that it has sufficient supply of masks in its stockpile for the entire country to use during this difficult and fearful time if managed appropriate, but in a closed-door meeting, Mr Chan’s words signal the opposite.
To wear or not to wear?

The government has been cautioning the public to stay calm and avoid using masks every day, saying that it is only necessary to don a mask if they are feeling unwell.
When distributing the five million masks to every household in Singapore, the government explained that it was not meant to be used every day. Instead, the four masks were given out so that people would have access to them when needed.
In that same press conference on 30 January, Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong advised the public not to wear a mask if they are healthy, adding that they will be better protected by washing their hands regularly with soap and water.
The same was also echoed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a Facebook post on the same day where he said “there is no need to wear a mask if we are well”.
Also, the Health Ministry placed a prominent advertisement on Straits Times on 31 January, telling everyone not to use masks if one is well.
IMG_20200214_170523-450x338.jpg

Snaking queue at Lucky Plaza of people waiting to buy face masks (Photo: Terry Xu)
However, in contrary to the government’s advice, four medical practitioners in Singapore co-signed a letter advising people to wear face masks when they leave home to control the spread of Covid-19.
In the viral letter entitled “Health advisory from senior medical practitioners to Singaporeans”, the doctors pointed out that “as this virus is said to be milder, infected people with no symptoms could transmit the virus to others silently. A certain percentage will developing deadly disease” and warned that temperature screening works less well to identify those infected.
“As they mingle freely and unmasked, more and more people could be infected daily without even knowing it.”, said the practitioners.
The letter went on, “We are advising everyone to wear a mask always when leaving home. If one faces a person and both parties are masked, it is considerably safer, constituting a 2 barrier protection. It may not possible for everyone to get a new surgical mask everyday. We need to find creative solutions. Some people have purchased washable cloth masks, sewed them, constructed them with suitable paper, or tied a scarf to the face. These measures are better than no mask at all.”
Mask shortages around the world

The issue of mask shortages is a concern for many nations right now, especially in places close to China—the country hardest hit by the outbreak—such as Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.
In Macau, the government announced that it would be releasing 20 million masks to its citizens via a rationing system that allows each person to buy a maximum of 10 surgical masks every 10 days at designated pharmacies.
This was announced on 22 January, just as Macau confirmed its first case.
About three weeks later, on 14 February, the Macau Secretary for Social Affairs and Culture Ao Ieong Iu announced that the region would be setting up a production line for masks through a local team. She said, “We hope in the fourth round of the government’s mask rationing, the new production line will be able to provide masks to Macau residents.”
In Hong Kong, Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor revealed on 8 February that the government’s internal reserve of masks were down to just one month’s supply, said South China Morning Post. Earlier it was revealed that the government has only 12 million masks left.
Ms Lam announced that the city government has bought 48 million masks and received 17 million more from China in efforts to address the shortage caused by panic over the deadly coronavirus outbreak. Unfortunately, she said that the supplies may not arrive in time.
Ms Lam said, “This shortage is not a unique problem in Hong Kong, but the whole world, [though] especially in our region,” Lam said, pleading for the public’s understanding over the resupply delays.
She added that more staff and volunteers in the correctional service’s factory would increase Hong Kong’s supply from 1.8 million a month to 2.5 million. The extra 700,000 masks will be channelled to outsourced cleaners for free.
 

Hypocrite-The

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don’t worry about damaged reputation from the leak audio recording of Minister Chan’s rant for you have no reputation to begin with
2 MIN READ
1
84045157_597844727661277_6304745612361334784_n-1140x571.jpg

by Teo Soh Lung
I was exceedingly amused by the letter written by the President of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry regarding the leak of the audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s rant at a private meeting with business leaders. His letter expressed the fear that its standing of “high repute” has been damaged by the leak. It also expressed the disappointment and regret about the conduct of one of its members and the erosion of trust between the Chamber and the minister.
If I can offer a bit of consolation to the President here.
Don’t worry about the leak. Recording private meetings are done by governments all the time. Your member’s conduct is not disgraceful at all.
One example I can give is the unauthorised recording of my speech at a private extraordinary general meeting of the Singapore Law Society sometime in the 1980s. My speech was secretly recorded and reproduced verbatim for the then prime minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew who attempted to run me down (though unsuccessfully) at the Parliamentary Select Committee hearing on the Amendment to the Legal Profession Act in 1986.



ADVERTISEMENT

So Mr President, don’t worry. If the government can behave in such a disgraceful manner when dealing with a professional body like the Law Society, which in my view is much more important than your business Chamber, your member’s leak of an audio clip of the minister is quite in order.
There is also no need to regret that your member has brought down the Chamber’s good name. You and your council may be too conceited to think that the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry is a chamber of “high repute”. To me, your chamber has done nothing for the ordinary people of Singapore. Indeed your chamber merely caters for the rich and powerful, the ministers and the business people. Let me give you one example of how you have failed the ordinary people.
You have a very impressive auditorium named after one of your founders, the well known philanthropist and activist, Mr Tan Kah Kee. It is open for rental both by your members as well as the public.
In 2015, I, on behalf of my organisation, Function 8, booked the auditorium for the launch of LIVING IN A TIME OF DECEPTION by Dr Poh Soo Kai, the grandson of Mr Tan Kah Kee. I paid the rental deposit of $510 as a member of the public. A few days after the booking, I was informed that members of your council have rejected my booking. No reason was given.
I immediately wrote to the chamber to reconsider the irrational decision of your council members. I copied my letter to all the council members who had valid email addresses. Your chamber of so called “high repute” did not even bother to respond or give reasons why the grandson of your founder could not even launch his book at the auditorium that is named after his grandfather.
Come on Mr President. There is no need to investigate who leaked the audio recording of the disgraceful rant of Minister Chan Chun Sing. You don’t have a reputation as far as I am concern. And I am sure, the public don’t care.
Don’t worry about damaged reputation from the leak audio recording of Minister Chan’s rant for you have no reputation to begin with
2 MIN READ
1

84045157_597844727661277_6304745612361334784_n-1140x571.jpg
by Teo Soh Lung
I was exceedingly amused by the letter written by the President of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry regarding the leak of the audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s rant at a private meeting with business leaders. His letter expressed the fear that its standing of “high repute” has been damaged by the leak. It also expressed the disappointment and regret about the conduct of one of its members and the erosion of trust between the Chamber and the minister.
If I can offer a bit of consolation to the President here.
Don’t worry about the leak. Recording private meetings are done by governments all the time. Your member’s conduct is not disgraceful at all.
One example I can give is the unauthorised recording of my speech at a private extraordinary general meeting of the Singapore Law Society sometime in the 1980s. My speech was secretly recorded and reproduced verbatim for the then prime minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew who attempted to run me down (though unsuccessfully) at the Parliamentary Select Committee hearing on the Amendment to the Legal Profession Act in 1986.
ADVERTISEMENT
So Mr President, don’t worry. If the government can behave in such a disgraceful manner when dealing with a professional body like the Law Society, which in my view is much more important than your business Chamber, your member’s leak of an audio clip of the minister is quite in order.
There is also no need to regret that your member has brought down the Chamber’s good name. You and your council may be too conceited to think that the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry is a chamber of “high repute”. To me, your chamber has done nothing for the ordinary people of Singapore. Indeed your chamber merely caters for the rich and powerful, the ministers and the business people. Let me give you one example of how you have failed the ordinary people.
You have a very impressive auditorium named after one of your founders, the well known philanthropist and activist, Mr Tan Kah Kee. It is open for rental both by your members as well as the public.
In 2015, I, on behalf of my organisation, Function 8, booked the auditorium for the launch of LIVING IN A TIME OF DECEPTION by Dr Poh Soo Kai, the grandson of Mr Tan Kah Kee. I paid the rental deposit of $510 as a member of the public. A few days after the booking, I was informed that members of your council have rejected my booking. No reason was given.
I immediately wrote to the chamber to reconsider the irrational decision of your council members. I copied my letter to all the council members who had valid email addresses. Your chamber of so called “high repute” did not even bother to respond or give reasons why the grandson of your founder could not even launch his book at the auditorium that is named after his grandfather.
Come on Mr President. There is no need to investigate who leaked the audio recording of the disgraceful rant of Minister Chan Chun Sing. You don’t have a reputation as far as I am concern. And I am sure, the public don’t care.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
SURGICAL MASKS DO NOTHING TO PROTECT AGAINST THE CORONA VIRUS so all this drama over a shortage of masks is absolutely ridiculous.
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Don’t worry about damaged reputation from the leak audio recording of Minister Chan’s rant for you have no reputation to begin with
2 MIN READ
1
84045157_597844727661277_6304745612361334784_n-1140x571.jpg

by Teo Soh Lung
I was exceedingly amused by the letter written by the President of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry regarding the leak of the audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s rant at a private meeting with business leaders. His letter expressed the fear that its standing of “high repute” has been damaged by the leak. It also expressed the disappointment and regret about the conduct of one of its members and the erosion of trust between the Chamber and the minister.
If I can offer a bit of consolation to the President here.
Don’t worry about the leak. Recording private meetings are done by governments all the time. Your member’s conduct is not disgraceful at all.
One example I can give is the unauthorised recording of my speech at a private extraordinary general meeting of the Singapore Law Society sometime in the 1980s. My speech was secretly recorded and reproduced verbatim for the then prime minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew who attempted to run me down (though unsuccessfully) at the Parliamentary Select Committee hearing on the Amendment to the Legal Profession Act in 1986.



ADVERTISEMENT

So Mr President, don’t worry. If the government can behave in such a disgraceful manner when dealing with a professional body like the Law Society, which in my view is much more important than your business Chamber, your member’s leak of an audio clip of the minister is quite in order.
There is also no need to regret that your member has brought down the Chamber’s good name. You and your council may be too conceited to think that the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry is a chamber of “high repute”. To me, your chamber has done nothing for the ordinary people of Singapore. Indeed your chamber merely caters for the rich and powerful, the ministers and the business people. Let me give you one example of how you have failed the ordinary people.
You have a very impressive auditorium named after one of your founders, the well known philanthropist and activist, Mr Tan Kah Kee. It is open for rental both by your members as well as the public.
In 2015, I, on behalf of my organisation, Function 8, booked the auditorium for the launch of LIVING IN A TIME OF DECEPTION by Dr Poh Soo Kai, the grandson of Mr Tan Kah Kee. I paid the rental deposit of $510 as a member of the public. A few days after the booking, I was informed that members of your council have rejected my booking. No reason was given.
I immediately wrote to the chamber to reconsider the irrational decision of your council members. I copied my letter to all the council members who had valid email addresses. Your chamber of so called “high repute” did not even bother to respond or give reasons why the grandson of your founder could not even launch his book at the auditorium that is named after his grandfather.
Come on Mr President. There is no need to investigate who leaked the audio recording of the disgraceful rant of Minister Chan Chun Sing. You don’t have a reputation as far as I am concern. And I am sure, the public don’t care.
Don’t worry about damaged reputation from the leak audio recording of Minister Chan’s rant for you have no reputation to begin with

2 MIN READ
1

84045157_597844727661277_6304745612361334784_n-1140x571.jpg
by Teo Soh Lung
I was exceedingly amused by the letter written by the President of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry regarding the leak of the audio recording of Minister Chan Chun Sing’s rant at a private meeting with business leaders. His letter expressed the fear that its standing of “high repute” has been damaged by the leak. It also expressed the disappointment and regret about the conduct of one of its members and the erosion of trust between the Chamber and the minister.

If I can offer a bit of consolation to the President here.
Don’t worry about the leak. Recording private meetings are done by governments all the time. Your member’s conduct is not disgraceful at all.
One example I can give is the unauthorised recording of my speech at a private extraordinary general meeting of the Singapore Law Society sometime in the 1980s. My speech was secretly recorded and reproduced verbatim for the then prime minister, the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew who attempted to run me down (though unsuccessfully) at the Parliamentary Select Committee hearing on the Amendment to the Legal Profession Act in 1986.

ADVERTISEMENT
So Mr President, don’t worry. If the government can behave in such a disgraceful manner when dealing with a professional body like the Law Society, which in my view is much more important than your business Chamber, your member’s leak of an audio clip of the minister is quite in order.
There is also no need to regret that your member has brought down the Chamber’s good name. You and your council may be too conceited to think that the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry is a chamber of “high repute”. To me, your chamber has done nothing for the ordinary people of Singapore. Indeed your chamber merely caters for the rich and powerful, the ministers and the business people. Let me give you one example of how you have failed the ordinary people.
You have a very impressive auditorium named after one of your founders, the well known philanthropist and activist, Mr Tan Kah Kee. It is open for rental both by your members as well as the public.
In 2015, I, on behalf of my organisation, Function 8, booked the auditorium for the launch of LIVING IN A TIME OF DECEPTION by Dr Poh Soo Kai, the grandson of Mr Tan Kah Kee. I paid the rental deposit of $510 as a member of the public. A few days after the booking, I was informed that members of your council have rejected my booking. No reason was given.
I immediately wrote to the chamber to reconsider the irrational decision of your council members. I copied my letter to all the council members who had valid email addresses. Your chamber of so called “high repute” did not even bother to respond or give reasons why the grandson of your founder could not even launch his book at the auditorium that is named after his grandfather.
Come on Mr President. There is no need to investigate who leaked the audio recording of the disgraceful rant of Minister Chan Chun Sing. You don’t have a reputation as far as I am concern. And I am sure, the public don’t care.
Wow, what a stinger from Ms Teo!:thumbsup:
 

LaoTze

Alfrescian
Loyal
If KeeChiu got the balls, and Arseloon too.
And all the PAP song and dance marionettes like Tan Suee Chieh ex NTUC Income CEO and ex NTUC Enterprise CEO




Bang Bus 2612 « Blowjob « Blowjob gifs « Blowjob gifs



Tan Suee Chieh ex NTUC Income CEO and ex NTUC Enterprise CEO and Kee Chiu and ArseLoon must go to UN and tell the world what they told us.

Show the world how $$$$ can get calibre of leadership that will astound and delight all

Have the courage of their conviction to go global with their fucking brand of wisdom man!

OR ALL THE THINGS THEY SAID JUST SELF SERVING RUBBISH LIKE THE SHIT THEY UNLOADED ONTO ALL OF US YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR





Emoji Laughing GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY





https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/sing...nic-buyers-idiots/ar-BB108O5m?ocid=spartandhp


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ger-infected-with-virus-sparks-global-concern

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...coronavirus-epidemic-snarls-science-worldwide

The economics of this are humongous....

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-15/ships-are-skipping-china-and-it-s-causing-turmoil-for-trade
 
Top