• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

This is why you must never take Tan Chuan Jin's (hot air) words seriously...

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Nonetheless, a troubling question remains, and it is this:

Why is work stopped for our soldiers, civil defence personnel and even SMRT workers while construction workers are expected to continue to work, even in PSI-400 conditions?

If “it’s not just about making money”, as Tan Chuan Jin says, then why could not the government issue a Stop-Work Order for construction workers – those workers who engage in heavy labour and manual work?

I’d posted this on Tan Chuan Jin’s Facebook page:

SAF cancelled all “outfield activities” to “ensure the well-being and safety of the soldiers” when the PSI hit 321.

“Other organisations here, such as the Singapore Civil Defence Force, reduced physical and outdoor training when the index crossed 100.”

And yet we are ok with construction (and other outdoor) workers working under PSI-400 conditions.

Safety of our workers is “paramount”, some ministers said. I fail to understand how this is so, given this disparity in how each group is treated.


- http://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com/2013/06/25/a-troubling-question/
 
All soldiers are or will be voters. Construction workers are mostly foreigners who will never vote.
 
Back
Top