- Joined
- Jun 17, 2020
- Messages
- 16,347
- Points
- 113
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
This is one of the ways the REAL rich keep their wealth
- Thread starter tobelightlight
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 6,408
- Points
- 113
**Yes, the core message in this viral image/post is largely true and well-substantiated**, especially in the context of the US tax system (which the phrasing and examples like art collections, yachts, mansions, and stocks strongly reference). It's a simplified but accurate description of the **"buy, borrow, die" strategy** (sometimes called "buy, borrow, die" or "invest, borrow, die") that many ultra-wealthy individuals (including billionaires) legally use to minimize or defer taxes on their wealth. This has been widely discussed by economists, tax experts, journalists, and even in academic papers for years.
### Breaking It Down Point by Point
- **"Billionaires don't have bank accounts like you and me. They have art collections. Yachts. Mansions. Stocks."**
This is hyperbolic for emphasis but directionally correct. Ultra-wealthy people often hold the bulk of their net worth in **illiquid, appreciating assets** (stocks, real estate, art, yachts, private businesses, etc.) rather than large cash balances in traditional bank accounts. Cash earns little or depreciates with inflation, so they keep wealth in growth-oriented holdings.
- **"None of it gets taxed until they sell it."**
True for capital gains. In the US (and many similar systems), unrealized gains (increase in asset value) are **not taxed** until the asset is sold. This is the "realization principle" in tax law—no sale, no taxable event.
- **"So they just never sell it. They borrow against it instead. Live off the loans."**
Yes—this is the heart of the strategy. Instead of selling (which triggers capital gains tax, often at 20%+ for long-term gains), they use assets as collateral for low-interest loans (e.g., securities-backed lines of credit or loans against art/real estate). Loan proceeds are **not considered taxable income** (debt isn't income). They live luxuriously off borrowed money while assets keep appreciating. Examples include figures like Elon Musk, who has used this approach extensively.
- **"Pay almost nothing."**
They pay interest on loans (often low rates, e.g., 3-6%), which is usually far cheaper than capital gains taxes. They may pay minimal income tax if they have little salary/dividends, and property taxes apply to real estate—but overall effective tax rates on wealth growth can be very low (sometimes single digits for the ultra-rich vs. higher for wage earners).
- **"Then when they die, their kids inherit it all tax-free. The wealth never gets taxed. It just gets passed down."**
Mostly accurate due to the **step-up in basis** rule (US IRC §1014). At death, heirs get the asset's value reset to its fair market value on the date of death. Any prior unrealized gains are wiped out for capital gains tax purposes. Heirs can sell immediately with little/no tax on pre-inheritance appreciation.
Note: This isn't fully "tax-free"—federal estate tax applies if the estate exceeds the exemption (~$13-15 million per person in recent years, rising to $15M/$30M for couples in 2026 under current law). But for assets below that threshold (or with planning like trusts), much wealth passes with minimal/no estate tax, and gains escape income tax forever.
- **"And we wonder why the gap keeps getting wider."**
This is the key critique: The system favors capital/wealth over labor income (wages taxed at higher ordinary rates up to 37%). It contributes to wealth inequality, as gains compound untaxed across generations while workers pay taxes annually on earnings.
### Important Nuances & Limitations
- It's **legal** and available to anyone with appreciating assets (not just billionaires—high-net-worth people use versions via home equity lines, margin loans, etc.), but scale matters: Banks offer favorable terms to the ultra-rich.
- Not every billionaire does this exclusively—many still sell assets or pay taxes (e.g., via salaries, dividends, or philanthropy). Some analyses note borrowing is only ~1% of top 0.1% economic income; much avoidance comes from simply not selling.
- It's not perfect: Loans accrue interest (which can compound), markets can crash (triggering margin calls), and proposals exist to reform it (e.g., limit step-up basis, tax unrealized gains for the ultra-rich, or wealth taxes).
- The post focuses on US rules; in Singapore (your location), capital gains are generally not taxed, inheritance/estate taxes don't exist, and wealth transfer is more straightforward—but similar borrowing strategies apply for liquidity without selling.
This isn't a "secret" conspiracy—it's how the tax code is structured, and it's been explained in outlets like The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, The Atlantic, and academic work since the 1990s. The image captures a real dynamic driving inequality debates.
----------------
### Breaking It Down Point by Point
- **"Billionaires don't have bank accounts like you and me. They have art collections. Yachts. Mansions. Stocks."**
This is hyperbolic for emphasis but directionally correct. Ultra-wealthy people often hold the bulk of their net worth in **illiquid, appreciating assets** (stocks, real estate, art, yachts, private businesses, etc.) rather than large cash balances in traditional bank accounts. Cash earns little or depreciates with inflation, so they keep wealth in growth-oriented holdings.
- **"None of it gets taxed until they sell it."**
True for capital gains. In the US (and many similar systems), unrealized gains (increase in asset value) are **not taxed** until the asset is sold. This is the "realization principle" in tax law—no sale, no taxable event.
- **"So they just never sell it. They borrow against it instead. Live off the loans."**
Yes—this is the heart of the strategy. Instead of selling (which triggers capital gains tax, often at 20%+ for long-term gains), they use assets as collateral for low-interest loans (e.g., securities-backed lines of credit or loans against art/real estate). Loan proceeds are **not considered taxable income** (debt isn't income). They live luxuriously off borrowed money while assets keep appreciating. Examples include figures like Elon Musk, who has used this approach extensively.
- **"Pay almost nothing."**
They pay interest on loans (often low rates, e.g., 3-6%), which is usually far cheaper than capital gains taxes. They may pay minimal income tax if they have little salary/dividends, and property taxes apply to real estate—but overall effective tax rates on wealth growth can be very low (sometimes single digits for the ultra-rich vs. higher for wage earners).
- **"Then when they die, their kids inherit it all tax-free. The wealth never gets taxed. It just gets passed down."**
Mostly accurate due to the **step-up in basis** rule (US IRC §1014). At death, heirs get the asset's value reset to its fair market value on the date of death. Any prior unrealized gains are wiped out for capital gains tax purposes. Heirs can sell immediately with little/no tax on pre-inheritance appreciation.
Note: This isn't fully "tax-free"—federal estate tax applies if the estate exceeds the exemption (~$13-15 million per person in recent years, rising to $15M/$30M for couples in 2026 under current law). But for assets below that threshold (or with planning like trusts), much wealth passes with minimal/no estate tax, and gains escape income tax forever.
- **"And we wonder why the gap keeps getting wider."**
This is the key critique: The system favors capital/wealth over labor income (wages taxed at higher ordinary rates up to 37%). It contributes to wealth inequality, as gains compound untaxed across generations while workers pay taxes annually on earnings.
### Important Nuances & Limitations
- It's **legal** and available to anyone with appreciating assets (not just billionaires—high-net-worth people use versions via home equity lines, margin loans, etc.), but scale matters: Banks offer favorable terms to the ultra-rich.
- Not every billionaire does this exclusively—many still sell assets or pay taxes (e.g., via salaries, dividends, or philanthropy). Some analyses note borrowing is only ~1% of top 0.1% economic income; much avoidance comes from simply not selling.
- It's not perfect: Loans accrue interest (which can compound), markets can crash (triggering margin calls), and proposals exist to reform it (e.g., limit step-up basis, tax unrealized gains for the ultra-rich, or wealth taxes).
- The post focuses on US rules; in Singapore (your location), capital gains are generally not taxed, inheritance/estate taxes don't exist, and wealth transfer is more straightforward—but similar borrowing strategies apply for liquidity without selling.
This isn't a "secret" conspiracy—it's how the tax code is structured, and it's been explained in outlets like The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, The Atlantic, and academic work since the 1990s. The image captures a real dynamic driving inequality debates.
----------------
Similar threads
