-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
The Workers' Party
- Thread starter sengkang
- Start date
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/Leon-Perera-515366291954885/"]Leon Perera[/h]Landed house visits in East Coast GRC from the CNY weekend...we were fortunate to catch many people in. We often experience scorching sun during these visits. This time it rained on and off. Luckily, there were some trees with thick leaf canopies which gave us good shelter!
[/URL]
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/Leon-Perera-515366291954885/?fref=nf"]Leon Perera[/h]During last weekend's house visits in East Coast GRC, I was humbled to meet two young Singaporeans who were keen supporters of the WP's vision for a democratic Singapore based on justice and equality. Here's a big shout-out to the two of you! It's vital for Singaporeans (and especially the young) to take an interest in the political future of the country, whatever party or perspective we may support. Last weekend, I met one stall-owner who said she was reluctant to support us because her son was the recipient of a government bursary. In contrast, I know a civil servant who donated his SG50 civil service bonus, disbursed a few months before GE2015, to the Workers' Party. Policy benefits are paid to Singaporeans from taxpayer monies, regardless of political affiliation. We should form our political views based on our hopes for Singapore's future.
[/URL]
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/Leon-Perera-515366291954885/"]Leon Perera[/h]CNY orange distribution at Bedok and house visits in East Coast GRC this morning! Our volunteer team assembled at 7am for a full morning of activity. There were so many warm greetings and invitations by residents to come in for drinks and shelter from the hot sun - thank you! One of them was a former member of Professor Jayakumar's grassroots team (Prof Jayakumar was, of course, a former MP in East Coast GRC). He and his wife were most kind to offer us drinks and a warm chat. He honestly shared that it would be hard for us to win his vote, as he had been working with the People's Action Party for decades. But he expressed his respect and appreciation for our convictions and the work we were doing. Thank you sir. This approach to politics is good for Singapore - agreeing to disagree while respecting one another's role in maintaining a healthy political system.
[/URL]
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/Leon-Perera-515366291954885/?fref=nf"]Leon Perera[/h][h=5]Leon Perera[/h]
In Parliament on 29 January, I had an interesting exchange with the Parliamentary Secretary for MCCY Mr Baey Yam Keng which was not, to my knowledge, reported at all in the media. I questioned him on the feedback from the Arts Engage group of local artists who had said that some local art works were censored because they embarrassed the government of the day and not because their work was against the national interest (yes, there is a difference). Their exact words were: "Our website also documents cases of works censored to protect the Government from embarrassment rather than for society's good. Perhaps it is fitting to remember here that arts funding is not the Government's but the people's money.” I thank Mr Baey for his honest response. He confirmed that NAC funding for the arts comes with the condition that the art work does not put “public institutions” in a bad and derogatory light. The exact exchange is reproduced below and it is up on the Parliament website. Mr Baey also made the point that the number of works where funding was withheld for this reason was very small. However I think once we withhold public funding for the arts because the art work embarrasses the government of the day and national leaders, even if it is for a handful of cases, we are on a slippery slope towards the use of public funds in a partisan political manner as opposed to Singapore’s national interest. Those few cases where funding was denied could have a disproportionate effect on other artists, encouraging them to self-censor. To produce good art, Singaporean artists should be able to exercise their artistic gifts in relation to the totality of social life, including public institutions, and without fear or favour. In my view, public arts funding should not be given on condition that there be no critique of the powers that be. Rather, it should be used to promote nothing but the good of Singapore and Singaporean art. Having said that, I respect Mr Baey’s honest and clear response, which is a credit to the practice of Parliamentary question time.
Parliamentary Exchange on 29 Jan 2016
I would like to ask the hon Parliamentary Secretary if he agrees with the views specifically expressed because it was not entirely clear. So here, I am quoting from the op-ed piece by Mr Tan Tarn How and Mr T Sasitharan. Mr T Sasitharan, as you know, if I am not wrong, is a Cultural Medallion recipient. In any case, he is a very prominent local artist speaking on behalf of the Arts Engage network of Singapore which involves a number of local artists.
The view that he expressed was, and I quote verbatim here, "Our website also documents cases of works censored to protect the Government from embarrassment rather than for society's good. Perhaps it is fitting to remember here that arts funding is not the Government's but the people's money." So, I would like to ask the hon Member does he agree with that view; and if not, why not?
Mr Baey Yam Keng: As part of the funding principles of the NAC, there is a requirement and understanding with the arts groups and the applicants that they should not put any public institutions in a bad light or put them in a derogatory position. It is in this context that was quoted by Arts Engage that the funding was re-considered.
But also, there was a change in substance of the content of the works that were first submitted for application and the eventual product that was produced by the artist. So, there was a difference in what was submitted earlier. There was also some of this to and fro that happened. Among the many applications and support that the NAC has given to the many arts groups and artists in Singapore, these are a minute minority of cases which the group has pointed out.
As I said in my speech, in MCCY and NAC, our role is to advocate the arts. We will stand on the side of the artists in their pursuit of artistic excellence. We hope to create and develop a bigger common space so that Singaporeans and the community-at-large can enjoy the works of our very talented artists in Singapore.
http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp…
[/URL]
Leon Perera
Here's the first instalment of the Working Show. Kenneth and Cheryl are the two "hosts with the most", don't you agree?
The Working Show - 17 Feb 2016
In our very first episode of The Working Show, we look back on GE2015, the Hepatitis C outbreak, and some interesting facts about WP and Parliament. Also, ca...
youtube.com
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/workersparty/?fref=nf"]The Workers' Party[/h]Answer to Leon Perera's Parliamentary Question on the workload and work stress of healthcare professionals in Singapore.
Read the full reply here: http://bit.Iy/21dlpEu
[/URL]
The Workers' PartyAnswer to Leon Perera's Parliamentary Question on education on ballot secrecy in schools.
Read the full reply here: http://bit.Iy/20IC2G1
The Workers' PartyAnswer to Dennis Tan Lip Fong 陈立峰''s Parliamentary Question on the replacement of MRT parts and systems.
Read the full reply here: http://bit.Iy/1Uc15kR
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/ChenShowMao/?fref=nf"]Chen Show Mao[/h]搭灯棚。Celebrating the 12th day of the Lunar New Year with the residents of Hougang Ave 2. 正月初十二与后港二巷的乐龄互助会共庆新春佳节。#新加坡人 #buildtomorrowsg
See Translation
[/URL]
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/yeejj.wp/"]Yee Jenn Jong, JJ (余振忠)[/h]Celebrating CNY with the good folks at Blk 702 Hougang. I have been here every year for CNY celebrations since joining WP and have always been amazed at the energy of the residents in organising the activities. Not even the heavy rain tonight could dampen the spirit.
[/URL]
I attended a block Chinese New Year dinner party at Hougang SMC tonight. This has been organised by residents every year for the past 20 over years. The atmosphere of the party was just great and I think every one enjoyed themselves. I wish there are more such block parties in Singapore.
Meantime it will be a packed day for our team tomorrow in Fengshan. After a fruitful house visit during the week, we look forward to spending more time with residents tomorrow.
1 hr ·
I attended a block Chinese New Year dinner party at Hougang SMC tonight. This has been organised by residents every year for the past 20 over years. The atmosphere of the party was just great and I think every one enjoyed themselves. I wish there are more such block parties in Singapore.
Meantime it will be a packed day for our team tomorrow in Fengshan. After a fruitful house visit during the week, we look forward to spending more time with residents tomorrow.
[h=5][URL="https://www.facebook.com/ChenShowMao/?fref=nf"]Chen Show Mao[/h]丙申年后港新春联欢晚会。With Sylvia and Pritam at the Hougang Lunar New Year Dinner this evening. Huat ah! #新加坡人 #buildtomorrowsg
[/URL]
Chen Show MaoThree #AljuniedGRC constituents with their MP at the opening of the Better Life Psychological Medicine Clinic dedicated to helping young Singaporeans manage their eating and mood disorders, and better cope with stress at home, school and work. Thank you, Ladies! #psychiatrist #psychologist #dietitian #buildtomorrowsg
Similar threads
