• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The true colours of constructive politics

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PM took issue with WP for not acknowledging the good, supposedly inciting division and for silently supporting xenophobia in the name of nationalism. Why does PM want acknowledgement for clearing the housing backlog when people didn’t even expect a backlog to begin with? Why does PM want acknowledgement for vigorously fixing transport woes when Singaporeans didn’t expect transport to fall to such low levels to begin with? Does PM think WP can incite division without there being an actual division to begin with? Does PM think there can be an Independence Day celebration without a national flag?

Does PM think that allowing the Philippine flag to be raised in Orchard Road and a march past by Filipinos dressed in military uniform is nationalistic to Singapore or nationalistic to the Philippines? If the flag has no significance, what is the point of our National Emblems Act? What is the point of putting up the Singapore flag on 9 Aug every year? Can a 60.1% PM be the utmost authority figure respected by all Singaporeans on what constitutes xenophobia? Can a 60.1% PM be a good judge of what good politics markers are?

PM claimed he would get to the bottom of any PAP MP making false and untruthful statements. Has PM gotten to the bottom of these statements?

http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2014/05/30/the-true-colours-of-constructive-politics/
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
I find him quarrelsome and pugnacious person.

He raise to the top without having to face much difficulty and now one his own he fumbled a lot.

PM took issue with WP for not acknowledging the good, supposedly inciting division and for silently supporting xenophobia in the name of nationalism. Why does PM want acknowledgement for clearing the housing backlog when people didn’t even expect a backlog to begin with? Why does PM want acknowledgement for vigorously fixing transport woes when Singaporeans didn’t expect transport to fall to such low levels to begin with? Does PM think WP can incite division without there being an actual division to begin with? Does PM think there can be an Independence Day celebration without a national flag?

Does PM think that allowing the Philippine flag to be raised in Orchard Road and a march past by Filipinos dressed in military uniform is nationalistic to Singapore or nationalistic to the Philippines? If the flag has no significance, what is the point of our National Emblems Act? What is the point of putting up the Singapore flag on 9 Aug every year? Can a 60.1% PM be the utmost authority figure respected by all Singaporeans on what constitutes xenophobia? Can a 60.1% PM be a good judge of what good politics markers are?

PM claimed he would get to the bottom of any PAP MP making false and untruthful statements. Has PM gotten to the bottom of these statements?

http://trulysingapore.wordpress.com/2014/05/30/the-true-colours-of-constructive-politics/
 
Top