The Scale Of The Universe

Even though I'm not a Believer of Gods, but it is still an amazing fascinating insight of the Universe..

Thanks for the link.. I just gave some bro a reputation point earlier. So will give yours tommorow..:)
 
Wow!

My mind is unable to fathom beyond our own planet's vastness. This is simply mind-boggling.

Cheers!
 
We humans sometimes have a mistaken belief we are the centre of the universe. It is a real humbling experience to know that in the universe we are so very small that we are in fact nothing at all.
 
Even though I'm not a Believer of Gods, but it is still an amazing fascinating insight of the Universe..

Thanks for the link.. I just gave some bro a reputation point earlier. So will give yours tommorow..:)

Thank you very much for the upzz.:D
 
A truly amazing website and thanks for the sharing.:)
 
Crazy as it sounds, maybe instead of studying what is beyond us, i.e. out of our reach as measured in millions of lightyears away, we should look inwards. In other words the sub-atomic world, as we can reached the inner space much easier than outer space to discover the mystery of the universe. Do I explain that right?:o:confused:
 
You've got a good point there! In fact the quest for a theory of everything calls for an understanding of what happened at the quantum physics level. In other words, we try to shoot backwards to the point of singularity, for that's when the big bang began, and time and space was born. Without knowing how everything is pushed back towards that one point of instance, physicists cannot account for why the universal forces are still not unified.

Crazy as it sounds, maybe instead of studying what is beyond us, i.e. out of our reach as measured in millions of lightyears away, we should look inwards. In other words the sub-atomic world, as we can reached the inner space much easier than outer space to discover the mystery of the universe. Do I explain that right?:o:confused:
 
as we can reached the inner space much easier than outer space

What leads you to the conclusion that exploring inner space is any easier than reaching outwards?
 
What leads you to the conclusion that exploring inner space is any easier than reaching outwards?

Haha...I was an avid science fiction reader, but not now. 1 lightyear is travelling at the speed of light for 365 days as a unit of measured distance. The distant star's light could have originated when dinosaurs were walking on this earth and we are seeing it now.

Inner space is reachable since we do not have to travel at all and it is right here where we are.
 
Inner space is reachable since we do not have to travel at all and it is right here where we are.

You may not have to travel but there are three major hurdles with exploring inner space:

1) You can't see inner space so you don't know what you're looking for.

2) Even if you have some clue regarding what's in there, the equipment required to make the most basic exploration of inner space looks like this. A rocket is a lot simpler.

3) Heisenberg's uncertainty principle makes measuring in inner space very difficult. If you can't take measurements, it's very difficult to formulate the equations required to describe inner space.
 
You've got a good point there! In fact the quest for a theory of everything calls for an understanding of what happened at the quantum physics level. In other words, we try to shoot backwards to the point of singularity, for that's when the big bang began, and time and space was born. Without knowing how everything is pushed back towards that one point of instance, physicists cannot account for why the universal forces are still not unified.

Thats the biggest problem there, it is still almost impossible to observe directly what happens at the planck scale with all our biggest particle colliders and the most sensitive detectors. Everything should work as predicted in general relativity except that gravity is not very well observed and known on the quantum scale yet.

Till today, scientists still do not know where does gravity comes from and what actually causes it.
 
Link: [video]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14372387[/video]

3 August 2011 Last updated at 08:38 GMT

[h=1]'Multiverse' theory suggested by microwave background[/h] By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News
_54378392_bubble.jpg
The team has located possible "bubble universe" evidence in WMAP data

Continue reading the main story [h=2]Related Stories[/h]

The idea that other universes - as well as our own - lie within "bubbles" of space and time has received a boost.
Studies of the low-temperature glow left from the Big Bang suggest that several of these "bubble universes" may have left marks on our own.
This "multiverse" idea is popular in modern physics, but experimental tests have been hard to come by.
The preliminary work, to be published in Physical Review D, will be firmed up using data from the Planck telescope.
For now, the team has worked with seven years' worth of data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, which measures in minute detail the cosmic microwave background (CMB) - the faint glow left from our Universe's formation.
'Mind-blowing' The theory that invokes these bubble universes - a theory formally called "eternal inflation" - holds that such universes are popping into and out of existence and colliding all the time, with the space between them rapidly expanding - meaning that they are forever out of reach of one another.
But Hiranya Peiris, a cosmologist at University College London, and her colleagues have now worked out that when these universes are created adjacent to our own, they may leave a characteristic pattern in the CMB.
Continue reading the main story [h=2]“Start Quote[/h]
It would be a pretty amazing thing to show that we have actually made physical contact in another universe”
George Efstathiou University of Cambridge
"I'd heard about this 'multiverse' for years and years, and I never took it seriously because I thought it's not testable," Dr Peiris told BBC News. "I was just amazed by the idea that you can test for all these other universes out there - it's just mind-blowing."
Dr Peiris' team first proposed these disc-shaped signatures in the CMB in a paper published in Physical Review Letters, and the new work fleshes out the idea, putting numbers to how many bubble universes we may be able to see now.
Crucially, they used a computer program that looked for these discs automatically - reducing the chance that one of the collaborators would see the expected shape in the data when it was not in fact there.
The program found four particular areas that look likely to be signatures of the bubble universes - where the bubbles were 10 times more likely than the standard theory to explain the variations that the team saw in the CMB.
However, Dr Peiris stressed that the four regions were "not at a high statistical significance" - that more data would be needed to be assured of the existence of the "multiverse".
"Finding just four patches is not necessarily going to give you a good probability on the full sky," she explained to BBC News. "That's not statistically strong enough to either rule it out or to say that there is a collision."
Dr Peiris said that data from the Planck telescope - a next-generation space telescope designed to study the CMB with far greater sensitivity - would put the idea on a firmer footing, or refute it. However, the data from Planck cannot be discussed publicly before January 2013.
_54383318_54383317.jpg
Data from the Planck telescope should resolve the question once and for all
George Efstathiou, director of the Kavli Institute of Cosmology at the University of Cambridge, called the work "the first serious attempt to search for something like this... from the methodology point of view it's interesting".
He noted that the theories that invoked the multiverse were fraught with problems, because they dealt in so many intangible or immeasurable quantities.
"My own personal view is that it will need new physics to solve this problem," he told BBC News. "But just because there are profound theory difficulties doesn't mean one shouldn't take the picture seriously."
Dr Peiris said that even if these bubble universes were confirmed, we could never learn anything further about them.
"It would be wonderful to be able to go outside our bubble, but it's not going to be possible," she explained.
"They're born close together - that's when the collision happens - and this same inflation happens between the bubbles. They're being hurled apart and space-time is expanding faster than light between them."
But Professor Efstathiou said the search was inherently worth it. He explained: "It would be a pretty amazing thing to show that we have actually made physical contact in another universe. It's a long shot, but it would by very profound for physics."
 
no center, but a zero point where everything begins....and ends. it's a math equation.

If the beginning and the end are at the same coordinates, the "centre" is an arbitrary point.
 
Back
Top