The naivety of the PAP government

Jail for man involved in scheme linked to bogus sales transactions of over $240m​

75903a04047b86d7a423e92ec83b94d2cfddd56ba933c75d1ca761b1db524512


Feb 17, 2025

SINGAPORE – A man, who was part of a syndicated missing trader fraud (MTF) scheme, falsified 704 sales invoices linked to a wholesale trading firm, reflecting fictitious sales transactions totalling more than $240 million.

Tan Tuan Heng, 46, was the sole director and shareholder of Brillantec Solutions (BSPL) at the time of the offences.

With the falsified sales invoices, BSPL made tax claims of over $16 million, leading to more than $191,000 in refunds.

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) has withheld claims linked to the remaining amount.

Separately, Tan submitted 11 goods and services tax (GST) monthly returns between October 2012 and October 2013, based on fictitious sales transactions supported by forged supplier invoices and falsified BSPL invoices.

The Singaporean falsely claimed nearly $480,000 in taxes for the period, and received the amount in refunds.

On Feb 17, Tan was sentenced to 11 years and six months’ jail after he pleaded guilty to nine charges for offences including cheating and those linked to GST-linked crimes.

The prosecution stated in court documents that BSPL was incorporated in September 2011.

In 2012, Tan faced financial difficulties and hatched a plan to make fraudulent GST claims based on fictitious sales transactions.


Among other things, he claimed taxes from Iras for the purported sale transactions to overseas customers between October 2012 and October 2013.

The goods in these transactions purportedly came from three suppliers.

In reality, BSPL did not purchase the goods from the suppliers or sell them to the overseas customers.

BSPL’s tax agent later filed 11 GST monthly returns that included fictitious sales transactions.

As a result, Iras paid BSPL nearly $480,000 in tax refunds and Tan used his ill-gotten gains to settle his debts and personal expenses.

The prosecutors said that BSPL was required to file GST returns on a monthly basis and was liable for GST on taxable supplies made to its customers.


The firm must also pay taxes to Iras on a monthly basis when it filed its GST returns.

Between October 2012 and January 2014, BSPL made false entries in its GST returns, leading to undercharged taxes totalling more than $4.2 million.

In addition, Tan was involved in an MTF scheme between June 2013 and June 2014.

The prosecutors said that Trinh Tien Dung, a Vietnamese, and Luke Giam Zi Hin, a 41-year-old Singaporean, were masterminds of the scheme.

It made use of taxation schemes, such as GST, by exploiting the system of self-declaration.

Overall, fraudulent input tax claims amounting to about $16 million were submitted to Iras, leading to more than $191,000 in refunds.

Between June 2013 and June 2014, Tan was part of a group that conducted BSPL’s business for a fraudulent purpose.

He received a total commission of between $360,000 and $480,000.

In an unrelated case, Tan was a sales manager at Techtiq when he hatched a plan to cheat the firm.

With the use of items such as forged purchase orders, Techtiq’s account staff made payments of more than US$457,000 (S$613,000) and over $256,000 to another company’s bank accounts in March and April 2018.

Tan then received some US$455,000 and around $255,000 after the director of the other firm deducted a 0.5 per cent commission for the ruse.
 
Any S'pore ministers foolish enough to sign away 650,000
jobs to unemployed Indians are clowns.
pap-tsls-absolute-confidence-in-winning-and-commitment-to-v0-3rl1ubl3jrve1.jpeg
 
Retrenchments for S'porean PMEs young and old. Blame the 65% who voted to be sodomised.
y8uv5dw7p6cf1.gif
 

Singaporean's home address illegally changed by scammers via ICA service, triggering banking nightmare​

In December, Raymond Tan discovered that his home address had been changed without his knowledge. His Singpass account was then frozen, disrupting his access to essential government services.
Singaporean's home address illegally changed by scammers via ICA service, triggering banking nightmare


The Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) Building in Singapore.

18 Feb 2025

SINGAPORE: A rude shock followed by worries and frustration – 2025 has so far been an emotional rollercoaster for Mr Raymond Tan after he discovered that his home address registered with the authorities was changed without his knowledge.

The Singaporean is one of 71 people whose addresses were illegally altered by scammers via the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority’s (ICA) electronic service.

Parts of this e-service have been halted since Jan 11 so ICA can roll out further security measures. Authorities have also suspended the Singpass accounts of all affected individuals.

For Mr Tan, who is in his forties, the knowledge that his personal details in a government system can be accessed and changed by fraudulent actors has been unnerving.

While the suspension of his Singpass account has caused inconveniences, the biggest shock came when his personal bank accounts were nearly shut down.

“It has not been a peaceful start to the new year,” Mr Tan told CNA in an interview on Wednesday (Feb 12).

Mr Tan first realised something was amiss on Dec 30 while purchasing travel insurance at the airport.

Using MyInfo, a digital service that auto-fills forms with government-stored data, he noticed his home address had been changed to an unfamiliar Housing Board unit in Commonwealth Drive.

“I called Singpass immediately. They said they didn’t know what happened, but they gave me the option to freeze my Singpass. Of course, I did that,” he recounted.

Fearing further unauthorised access, he agreed to additional security measures requiring a video call for his Singpass account to be reinstated.

Still, even while on holiday, questions lingered in his mind.

“I was thinking if it means that my account had been compromised and if so, how long has it been and what else is affected,” Mr Tan said.

“I checked everything else, like the history of my Singpass transactions and my banking apps, and they seemed okay. So I told myself maybe it’s just a glitch and not something bad.”

But his fears were confirmed on Jan 11 when ICA disclosed that scammers had exploited vulnerabilities in its online service to alter residential addresses.

Mr Tan has since been issued a new identity card.

While he understands the need for his Singpass account to remain suspended during investigations, the situation has caused some disruptions. Without Singpass – an authenticator for various public and private sector digital services – he could not retrieve documents needed for his domestic helper's six-monthly medical examination.

He also could not proceed with his appointment as a donee in his father-in-law's Lasting Power of Attorney. An LPA is a legal document that allows individuals to appoint others to make decisions on their behalf if they become mentally incapacitated.

“Things like these are quite time-sensitive, especially with my father-in-law's advanced age … But I was told by the officer-in-charge that there’s no offline option to do this without my Singpass,” said Mr Tan.

To add to his stress, he discovered that his personal bank accounts at CIMB and OCBC had been put under review.

On Jan 27, he could not log into CIMB's internet banking service. His brother was also unable to access their joint account. Though resolved the next day, no explanation was provided as to why the review was initiated.

Two days later, in the midst of Chinese New Year celebrations, Mr Tan found that he could not transfer funds to his OCBC savings account. A call to the bank revealed that all his accounts, including joint accounts with his children, had been under review since Jan 20.

The biggest shock came on Feb 3 when letters from OCBC arrived saying that his accounts would be closed within 14 days due to “a change in the profile and/or activities”.

“We regret to inform you that we can therefore no longer provide products and/or services to you,” the OCBC letters said.

Frustrated, he pressed the bank for an explanation but received none.

“If this is due to the address issue, the bank can make it more troublesome for me, like requiring me to go down in person for transactions as a temporary measure, and that’s okay. But to suddenly want to close my and my children’s accounts without an explanation, I felt quite bullied,” he said.

OCBC eventually reversed its decision, informing Mr Tan last Thursday that his accounts would not be closed.

In response to CNA’s queries, OCBC said it reviews customers’ accounts for risk management purposes, sometimes leading to closures due to suspicious activities or law enforcement requests.

Generally, when an account is flagged as suspicious, the bank immediately places a hold on it to prevent potential misuse or to protect customers from unauthorised and fraudulent transactions, said Mr Beaver Chua, head of anti-fraud at OCBC’s group financial crime compliance.

This hold is followed by a thorough review to ensure accuracy. During this process, the bank cannot disclose specific details as doing so could compromise the investigation.

“Once the review is completed and a customer’s account is found to be compliant, we will release the hold on the account. Otherwise, the account will be closed if it is found to be suspicious or misused by bad actors,” said Mr Chua.

Similarly, CIMB said it takes a proactive approach to combating scams by working with regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies.

“By implementing enhanced security measures swiftly, we remain committed to protecting our customers’ bank accounts,” a spokesperson said.
how_to_check_your_residential_address_on_the_ica_website.png


Authorities said scammers exploited an “Others” option in ICA’s online service, which allowed address changes through a proxy. The process required a Singpass login, the applicant's NRIC number and date of issue, and a verification PIN mailed to the new address.

The scammers used "relinquished" Singpass accounts to impersonate proxies and fraudulently change victims' addresses, said Minister of State for Home Affairs Sun Xueling in a parliamentary update earlier this month.

She also said that ICA’s change of address e-service, launched in 2020, included safeguards such as requiring the NRIC's date of issue. However, these measures have proven inadequate as malicious actors managed to get hold of the information.

Mr Tan speculates that his NRIC details may have been compromised through common practices such as exchanging IDs for building entry passes or submitting photocopies for major purchases such as cars.

“Until the incident happened, I don't think anybody really thought that the IC’s date of issue is so important,” he said.

Even after resolving his banking issues, Mr Tan remains on guard. Just last week, he received a notification from an insurer about a change in his contact details – which triggered a flurry of calls and emails before the insurer confirmed it was "a glitch".

He continues to worry about how much of his personal information is in the hands of scammers and the impact this could have on him and his family.

“If this person was able to change my address, did he also get into other parts of my account? If he has all my information, what will he do with it? Can he masquerade as me?” he said with a sigh.

“At this point, I will say that I feel quite helpless. It seems like there's nothing much I can do.”
 

Jail for man who cheated govt agency Workforce Singapore of over $70k in funds for upskilling​

75903a04047b86d7a423e92ec83b94d2cfddd56ba933c75d1ca761b1db524512


Mar 12, 2025

SINGAPORE - A partner of a firm that developed computer games hatched a plan to cheat Workforce Singapore (WSG) of more than $70,000 in total by making fraudulent claims for funds supporting workers’ upskilling and reskilling.

Chan Ah Wee, 56, who was with a company called Common Extract at the time of the offences, was sentenced to a year and four months’ jail on March 12 after he pleaded guilty to a cheating charge linked to over $31,000.

Two other charges relating to the remaining amount were considered during his sentencing.

The Singaporean has since made full restitution.

In mid-2017, Common Extract engaged a man, identified as Mr Tiong Ming Huat, as a project manager on a trial basis for a period of one month.

The firm later employed him as a manager from July 2017 to June 2018.

Common Extract applied for Mr Tiong to join an initiative known as the Professional Conversion Programme offered by WSG, a statutory board under the Ministry of Manpower.

The scheme is among WSG’s programmes targeted at professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) to undergo skill conversion, so they can move into new jobs or sectors that have good opportunities for progression.

Funding support is provided to participating employers as long as they and the interested PMETs meet the eligibility criteria. The participating employers will then fund the remaining salary and course fees not covered by the funding support.

To receive the funding, Common Extract signed a Letter of Undertaking with an educational institution called Lithan Academy, which had been appointed by WSG to manage the scheme.

On or around June 20, 2017, Chan decided to deceive WSG by falsely stating that Mr Tiong’s monthly salary was $5,800, submitting to Lithan Academy letters including those showing Mr Tiong’s purported monthly salary.

In fact, Mr Tiong’s salary as stated in his employment contract was $2,500, and he had been paid less than that because of Common Extract’s poor financial performance.

DPP Chua said Chan had created these documents and Mr Tiong agreed to them.

Court documents did not disclose if Mr Tiong has been charged in court or if he had been dealt with earlier.

He was later accepted into the Professional Conversion Programme which was initially slated to start in July 2017 before it was postponed to September that year.

In January 2018, Mr Tiong resigned from Common Extract, but continued to perform work for it on an ad hoc basis.

The prosecutor said Chan failed to inform Lithan Academy and WSG about these developments.

Between February and July 2018, WSG was duped into a delivering a grant of over $31,000 to Common Extract.

WSG later found discrepancies between one of the letters Chan had submitted and Mr Tiong’s Central Provident Fund statement.

A WSG senior manager alerted the police in May 2020, and Chan was charged in court in 2023.

For cheating, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
 

Jail for man who cheated govt agency Workforce Singapore of over $70k in funds for upskilling​

75903a04047b86d7a423e92ec83b94d2cfddd56ba933c75d1ca761b1db524512


Mar 12, 2025

SINGAPORE - A partner of a firm that developed computer games hatched a plan to cheat Workforce Singapore (WSG) of more than $70,000 in total by making fraudulent claims for funds supporting workers’ upskilling and reskilling.

Chan Ah Wee, 56, who was with a company called Common Extract at the time of the offences, was sentenced to a year and four months’ jail on March 12 after he pleaded guilty to a cheating charge linked to over $31,000.

Two other charges relating to the remaining amount were considered during his sentencing.

The Singaporean has since made full restitution.

In mid-2017, Common Extract engaged a man, identified as Mr Tiong Ming Huat, as a project manager on a trial basis for a period of one month.

The firm later employed him as a manager from July 2017 to June 2018.

Common Extract applied for Mr Tiong to join an initiative known as the Professional Conversion Programme offered by WSG, a statutory board under the Ministry of Manpower.

The scheme is among WSG’s programmes targeted at professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) to undergo skill conversion, so they can move into new jobs or sectors that have good opportunities for progression.

Funding support is provided to participating employers as long as they and the interested PMETs meet the eligibility criteria. The participating employers will then fund the remaining salary and course fees not covered by the funding support.

To receive the funding, Common Extract signed a Letter of Undertaking with an educational institution called Lithan Academy, which had been appointed by WSG to manage the scheme.

On or around June 20, 2017, Chan decided to deceive WSG by falsely stating that Mr Tiong’s monthly salary was $5,800, submitting to Lithan Academy letters including those showing Mr Tiong’s purported monthly salary.

In fact, Mr Tiong’s salary as stated in his employment contract was $2,500, and he had been paid less than that because of Common Extract’s poor financial performance.

DPP Chua said Chan had created these documents and Mr Tiong agreed to them.

Court documents did not disclose if Mr Tiong has been charged in court or if he had been dealt with earlier.

He was later accepted into the Professional Conversion Programme which was initially slated to start in July 2017 before it was postponed to September that year.

In January 2018, Mr Tiong resigned from Common Extract, but continued to perform work for it on an ad hoc basis.

The prosecutor said Chan failed to inform Lithan Academy and WSG about these developments.

Between February and July 2018, WSG was duped into a delivering a grant of over $31,000 to Common Extract.

WSG later found discrepancies between one of the letters Chan had submitted and Mr Tiong’s Central Provident Fund statement.

A WSG senior manager alerted the police in May 2020, and Chan was charged in court in 2023.

For cheating, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
This is just a tip of the iceberg, there are many many mediocre training service providers overpriced their courses, just want to make money from Sinkie's skill future fund
 

Company director tricked Tampines Town Council into paying extra $233,000 for pumps​

75903a04047b86d7a423e92ec83b94d2cfddd56ba933c75d1ca761b1db524512


Apr 03, 2025

SINGAPORE – A company director has admitted to billing Tampines Town Council to pay for a more expensive product instead of the actual product he had provided.

Zhang Shuyan, the Singaporean managing director of electrical and mechanical maintenance and installation firm FYH Integrated, pleaded guilty on April 3 to one charge of falsifying accounts to the town council.

One similar charge will be taken into consideration during his sentencing on April 17.

Company records show the 59-year-old and his wife had incorporated the firm in 2009 with $500,000.

The company, which is currently in liquidation due to insolvency, entered into a three-year contract with Tampines Town Council in February 2016.

FYH was responsible for the maintenance, servicing and repair of pumps within the Housing Board blocks under the town council’s purview. It was also contracted to replace defective pumps within the HDB blocks.

The contract included a schedule of rates, with a list of items and their corresponding prices, that FYH would bill the town council for.

Between April 2016 and July 2017, Zhang’s firm replaced 267 single-stage pumps within the Tampines estate. Single-stage pumps were not listed under the agreed schedule of rates.

The court heard that Zhang billed the products as multi-stage pumps which, according to court documents, cost $1,425.28 each, compared with a single-stage pump that cost $549.98.

The town council received 203 invoices for the replacement of the pumps and paid more than $380,000 to FYH.

Zhang’s scheme came to light some time in 2017, after the town council’s managing agent realised FYH had been charging it for multi-stage pumps even though only single-stage pumps were used.

After he was found out, Zhang agreed to refund the extra amount that the town council had paid out to his company, which was more than $233,000. He fully repaid the amount over a period of nine months.

Those found guilty of falsifying accounts can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined for each charge.
 
Back
Top