- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 60,567
- Points
- 113
it might have been a leica then. definitely not a samsung nor huawei phone.I was thinking it was well taken.to the photographer.
it might have been a leica then. definitely not a samsung nor huawei phone.I was thinking it was well taken.to the photographer.
All the names you cited are among the greatest leaders in Chinese history. Xi will feel so flattered.I hope Xi rules forever. The longer the emperor rules..the more the country cocks up. For example Qianlong, Qin Shi Huang, Mao Zedong..which was actually ChiCons land era of stagnation....with Xi in control...chicon land will stagnate because huge amount or resources will continue to be pumped into the bureaucracy and internal security to prevent secession...and soon it will hit a breaking point...now the economic stagnation is already happening...and Xi will get the blame...he stays longer .he get blamed more..so good if he stays
It’s not an issue of communism or marxism or whatever you call it, these are form our substance. The model of democracy like US are controlled by a few elites, regardless of which party won. People don’t actually have a choice, people are merely fooled into believing casting a vote = having a choice. The issue is about leadership. In the last 20 years every dictatorship that was overthrown ended up worse for the country. Suharto, Marcos, Saddam, Mubarak, LKY, Tito… every single oneThats because he is a true communist.all bus8nesses should be under state control. That is currently happening. And he hates rich people.
Xi is not bothered by the general behaviour of the public at large, unlike Mao who fears people become knowledgeable. His control is targeted at the elements that could destroy the country. This Tibetans and Uighurs are easily manipulated by the West. So are the Honkies and Falungong. If the Chinese leadership lets any of these disruptive elements rise, it will definitely break up like USSR.actually I think you're right. The harder the control, the more repercussions from it.
It’s not an issue of communism or marxism or whatever you call it, these are form our substance. The model of democracy like US are controlled by a few elites, regardless of which party won. People don’t actually have a choice, people are merely fooled into believing casting a vote = having a choice. The issue is about leadership. In the last 20 years every dictatorship that was overthrown ended up worse for the country. Suharto, Marcos, Saddam, Mubarak, LKY, Tito… every single one
These so called leaders did not know when to quit thus ensuring the destruction of their dynastiesAll the names you cited are among the greatest leaders in Chinese history. Xi will feel so flattered.
These so called leaders did not know when to quit thus ensuring the destruction of their dynasties
Doubt if that's possible.should China split it'll split into three different countries .Tibet ,Xinjiang and China.Even then China is still a huge country.Nearly the size of Australia.Remember China is a rather homogeneous country unlike IndiaI would imagine some of the more nationalistic ah nehs would be miffed at China due to the shit-stirring happening at their northern borders.
But CCP China is a shitty regime supported by shitty people. The sooner it becomes kaput and gets smashed up into small pieces like Yugoslavia, the safer the world will become.
Indonesia has decided to fight the Chinese virus by stopping coal export. I hope it works.
I'm not sure I agree. I witness so many of China's high-flying stars get taken down 1 by 1. He feels very much like Mao 2.0. An anti-Deng. I leave the rest of the argument about minorities out because I don't have satisfactory info.Xi is not bothered by the general behaviour of the public at large, unlike Mao who fears people become knowledgeable. His control is targeted at the elements that could destroy the country. This Tibetans and Uighurs are easily manipulated by the West. So are the Honkies and Falungong. If the Chinese leadership lets any of these disruptive elements rise, it will definitely break up like USSR.
I wouldn't label Gorbachev a moron lah... He did what he did with what he thought. Maybe he thought wrongly. That's not weak. That's mistaken. There are plenty more moronic leaders out there. No need to say ok?Look at Mikhail Gorbachev, the high IQ moron. He believed the Eastern blocs countries will stay true to Marxism. He will forever be remembered as the weakling who caused the break up of the great USSR turning it from a superpower to a country ruled by warlords. Not flattering at all! History does not focus on Xi putting Bo Xilai out of power. It will remember Xi as the strong leader who pushed China into the international scene and remained strong in the face of adversaries.