So, if the Law Society illegal obtained a copy of Ravi's medical record with his pyschiatrist, and used it to justify this effort to suspend him, can an illegally obtained evidence be submissable at all in this case? If the mental state of mind was the determinant in the ability of a lawyer to practice, why has not the Law Society require all Lawyers under pyschiatric treatment to reveal themselves and allow the Law Society access to their medical records? If they do not apply this to all other lawyers but only to Roy, its just a fix.