So sinkapore must have a certain percentage of needy to tip the votes at the ballot so Pappies can stay in power forever.
KNN, from ancient times to modern times, sinkapore still talk about helping the poor. 300 billions in reserve and every family is HDB housed , where got poor people woh !
At least the Thais are great people, they love their country and fight the common enemy. In sinkapore, small money has blinded the reality.
If pappies supporters still dont wake up and vote PAP out next GE, the future for sinkapore will be bloody.
BANGKOK, Thailand - Thailand's prime minister refused again to cede to protesters determined to oust him, but offered an unconventional compromise _ a referendum on his fate aimed at ending the political crisis that has paralyzed the government and raised fears of economic chaos.
Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej hopes the vote will allow him to keep his job while placating the People's Alliance for Democracy, which has vowed to continue its campaign, including occupying the seat of government, until Samak quits.
The referendum will ask the public to choose between the alliance and the government, but many analysts say a simple yes-no vote is insufficient in the face of a complicated political crisis.
The alliance ridiculed the plan announced Thursday, saying Samak will manipulate the vote, just as they allege he did during general elections in December 2007.
"The referendum is an attempt by Mr. Samak to buy himself some more time in the office," Sondhi Limthongkul, a media tycoon and one of the protest leaders, told The Associated Press.
Before announcing the referendum, which caught the nation by surprise, Samak delivered a combative speech on national radio, again refusing to step down.
"I will not abandon the ship, and I will take responsibility for the crew on board," Samak said, peppering his speech with folksy language. "I am not resigning. I have to protect the democracy of this country."
But some have said the referendum could aggravate rather than alleviate the political deadlock.
"A referendum is normally used to test public approval on whether to go to war or pass an important law. It would not be effective as a tool to solve a complicated political crisis with many conditions and layers," said Panithan Wattanayagorn, a political science professor at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.
The alliance is a loosely knit group of royalists, wealthy and middle-class urban residents, and union activists. It wants Parliament to be revamped so most lawmakers are appointed rather than elected, arguing that Thailand's impoverished rural majority is too susceptible to vote buying.
The group has already had a hand in bringing down one government, when it staged demonstrations in 2006 that paved the way for the bloodless coup that removed then Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra from office.
The protesters say Samak is Thaksin's stooge and is running the government for him by proxy.
The government's failure to resolve the deadlock has also raised fears of an economic downturn, especially in Thailand's crucial tourist industry, which is particularly susceptible to concerns about political instability.
KNN, from ancient times to modern times, sinkapore still talk about helping the poor. 300 billions in reserve and every family is HDB housed , where got poor people woh !
At least the Thais are great people, they love their country and fight the common enemy. In sinkapore, small money has blinded the reality.
If pappies supporters still dont wake up and vote PAP out next GE, the future for sinkapore will be bloody.
BANGKOK, Thailand - Thailand's prime minister refused again to cede to protesters determined to oust him, but offered an unconventional compromise _ a referendum on his fate aimed at ending the political crisis that has paralyzed the government and raised fears of economic chaos.
Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej hopes the vote will allow him to keep his job while placating the People's Alliance for Democracy, which has vowed to continue its campaign, including occupying the seat of government, until Samak quits.
The referendum will ask the public to choose between the alliance and the government, but many analysts say a simple yes-no vote is insufficient in the face of a complicated political crisis.
The alliance ridiculed the plan announced Thursday, saying Samak will manipulate the vote, just as they allege he did during general elections in December 2007.
"The referendum is an attempt by Mr. Samak to buy himself some more time in the office," Sondhi Limthongkul, a media tycoon and one of the protest leaders, told The Associated Press.
Before announcing the referendum, which caught the nation by surprise, Samak delivered a combative speech on national radio, again refusing to step down.
"I will not abandon the ship, and I will take responsibility for the crew on board," Samak said, peppering his speech with folksy language. "I am not resigning. I have to protect the democracy of this country."
But some have said the referendum could aggravate rather than alleviate the political deadlock.
"A referendum is normally used to test public approval on whether to go to war or pass an important law. It would not be effective as a tool to solve a complicated political crisis with many conditions and layers," said Panithan Wattanayagorn, a political science professor at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.
The alliance is a loosely knit group of royalists, wealthy and middle-class urban residents, and union activists. It wants Parliament to be revamped so most lawmakers are appointed rather than elected, arguing that Thailand's impoverished rural majority is too susceptible to vote buying.
The group has already had a hand in bringing down one government, when it staged demonstrations in 2006 that paved the way for the bloodless coup that removed then Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra from office.
The protesters say Samak is Thaksin's stooge and is running the government for him by proxy.
The government's failure to resolve the deadlock has also raised fears of an economic downturn, especially in Thailand's crucial tourist industry, which is particularly susceptible to concerns about political instability.
