• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tey Tsun Hang seeks court order to return to NUS

Administrator

Alfrescian
Loyal
237stock_tey_tsun_hang_03.jpg


Former National University of Singapore (NUS) law professor Tey Tsun Hang has applied for a court order to be reinstated as a lecturer at the NUS law school.

Tey, who was in February this year acquitted from charges of exploiting a former student by having sex with her in exchange for better grades, released court documents and a statement to media on Tuesday announcing his court action.

In his statement, Tey, 43, who is now living in Malayisa and is unemployed, said he was suspended by the university in a “breach of natural justice”, where his “right to a fair hearing was violated” on 27 July 2012, the day he was charged in court with corruption.

Further, he said, he was summarily dismissed by NUS on 28 May last year — the day he was found guilty and convicted of his charges — without giving him an opportunity to be heard and “without regard to due process”.

Calling NUS’s dismissal of him “illegal, irrational and procedurally improper”, Tey filed applications for two quashing orders against his suspension and dismissal, as well as one mandatory order for his reinstatement.

“The NUS jumped the gun,” he wrote in an affidavit filed in the High Court by his new legal counsel and human rights lawyer M Ravi. “In view of the appeal having been allowed on 28 February 2014, the NUS’ decision of summary dismissal on 28 May 2013 cannot stand, is void and of no legal effect.”

Tey stressed also that he was never called for any disciplinary hearing by the university; neither had he been served any charges from them.

The former law professor made headlines in Singapore two years ago, when news surfaced that he was being investigated for corruption. After going on trial, where details of his extra-marital affair with Darinne Ko, an ex-student of his, emerged, he was first convicted of his charges and sentenced to five months’ jail.
Tey served the time and left the country pending his appeal. The appeal, which was heard about five months later, and which was handled by lawyer Peter Low, was successful.
Yahoo Singapore has contacted the university for a response to Tey's court action.
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
His skin must be thick.

Or he must have measured his prick and feels it is so good, BIG and strong that he can still satisfy those hot NUS sluts..

That they NEED him back.

Sinkie already have lots of loser, don't need another to join them! LoL
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
He is a top end lawyer and legal is his forte. Like a high end mechanic knows how to make his car better, if NUS reject and rely letter is unacceptable he is likely to take NUS to court and that is a good case to watch. He won the case and can consider unfair dismissal and bring shame to NUS and PAP.

Like Roy case, netizens can help Roy with legal fees to take TTSH to court for unfair dismissal.

Time to break up PAP ridiculous politic that go against fair level playing field.

It has come to pass PAP has become a ridiculous party to lead Singapore. Break them up.




His skin must be thick.

Or he must have measured his prick and feels it is so good, BIG and strong that he can still satisfy those hot NUS sluts..

That they NEED him back.

Sinkie already have lots of loser, don't need another to join them! LoL
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
He is a top end lawyer and legal is his forte. Like a high end mechanic knows how to make his car better, if NUS reject and rely letter is unacceptable he is likely to take NUS to court and that is a good case to watch. He won the case and can consider unfair dismissal and bring shame to NUS and PAP.

Like Roy case, netizens can help Roy with legal fees to take TTSH to court for unfair dismissal.

Time to break up PAP ridiculous politic that go against fair level playing field.

It has come to pass PAP has become a ridiculous party to lead Singapore. Break them up.

Don't waste the time of citizens, who have more meaningful things to do with their lives than to support losers.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
His skin must be thick.

Or he must have measured his prick and feels it is so good, BIG and strong that he can still satisfy those hot NUS sluts..

That they NEED him back.

Sinkie already have lots of loser, don't need another to join them! LoL

NUS will settle with him and pay him an undisclosed hefty sum. NUS messed up.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What he did is only morally wrong but court had acquitted so he got no wrong.

I agree. Tey upset some powerful people and they went for him. Surprise that he got off.

The reasoning of the trial judge for his verdict is absolutely ludicrous. That trial judge should hang himself for stupidity. I suspect he is the laughing stock of the international judicail community.
 

TanSiongThye

Alfrescian
Loyal
The reasoning of the trial judge for his verdict is absolutely ludicrous. That trial judge should hang himself for stupidity. I suspect he is the laughing stock of the international judicail community.

Dis song litten juz 4 me!

[video=youtube;--tTNFpVU3k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--tTNFpVU3k[/video]
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Tey is better off starting his own practice. Am confident he will be a top lawyer. He has the brains! Just less drama in the courtroom for his own good.
 

Force 136

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This idiot screwed his student. This is conduct unbecoming of a person on his position even if no corruption was proved.

Taking advantage of a student is morally wrong.

He should be sacked. Period.
 

TanSiongThye

Alfrescian
Loyal
asdf jkl; zxcv

Locke,

Jaga8 & you = bad team. There, ze Jaga8 clown forced you to come in & … kalang kaboked.

http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?149890-Looking-beyond-the-persecution-of-Tey-Tsun-Hang

Wit you 2 jokers to sabo ops sapork me, how am I as presiding judge supposed to decide in the way my master ‘ve instructed for ze Tey case? Samsters prease help me!

De HEAT IS ON! You 2, machiam Laurel & Hardy. Which 1 of you is ze FAT ONE?

[video=youtube;TjJGmHIvNfE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjJGmHIvNfE[/video]
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Was Tan Siong Thye ordered to fix Law Professor Tey Tsun Hang?
Was Tan Siong Thye rewarded for His fixing job?
Was Tan Siong Thye promoted to high court judge because of his fixing job?

I am asking these questions to all the sinkies sheeps
 

Debonerman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tey is better off starting his own practice. Am confident he will be a top lawyer. He has the brains! Just less drama in the courtroom for his own good.

You would bring your legal problems and seek counsel from a proven immoral wolf in sheep clothing?
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
You may want to read my post below and think out of the box as what our supreme Leeder Lee Hsien Loong wants us to do!!!

Do you still remember Michael Khoo?
He is a senior counsel, senior district judge, registrar of the supreme court, deputy public prosecutor. He is such a high calibre legal eagle.

Why he was transferred from Senior District Judge to Deputy Public Prosecutor?
He was a senior district judge in JBJ 1986 trial and he found JBJ clear of all charges except one. The invisible hand was very upset and immediately AGC claimed for retrial and JBJ was sentenced to jail. Michael Khoo was transferred to AGC immediately after JBJ trial.

http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1432&Itemid=31

Michael Khoo is one of the courageous sinkie judge that we ever see and he is definitely not a judge without backbone.

Now, let us look at Tan Siong Thye academic credential. He was a chief district judge. He was graduated in 1979.
http://law.nus.edu.sg/alumni/alumni_directory.asp?Year=1979
He is definitely not a brilliant NUS graduate in his batch compared with CJ Choo Han Teck and Ho Peng Kee.
Insider said that Tan Siong Thye is not even a second class upper law graduate.
His academic credential is just so so.
http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/conference/ADR/speakers/Tan Siong Thye.aspx

Readers may want to ask why Tan Siong Thye is promoted to High Court?

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...yer-appointed-judicial-commissioners-20130930

On the same day, See Kee On and Ong Hian Sun were also promoted.

Now look at See Kee Oon and Ong Hian Sun academic credentials
See Kee Oon: FIRST CLASS honours from Cambridge
http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/conference/ADR/speakers/See Kee Oon.aspx

Ong Hian Sun
http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/Conference/CLC2011/speakers/Chief-Prosecutor-Mr-Ong-Hian-Sun.aspx
This guy has solid background and holds different positions compared with Tan Shiong Thye.

So Tan Siong Thye is the weakest but promoted to the highest rank in High Court.
Why is that so?
This guy is a ball carrier and under his belt, he brokered SMRT case.
http://atans1.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/smrt-ask-judge-to-step-down/

he said:
In his closing remarks, Chief District Judge Tan Siong Thye said train operator SMRT had shown it was prepared to learn from its mistakes.

so much money has been spent on SMRT court case and what has Tan Siong Thye contributed to Singapore society? None as he only talked the good things on behalf of SMRT.
Do you see any improvement on SMRT after the legal case handled by Tan Siong Thye?

Conclusion:
Singapore is not a meritocracy country!
In Singapore, in order to succeed in life, you dont have to be a first class or second class upper law graduate.
Most Importantly, you must be able to carry the balls and you are one of the clans.

Otherwise why MR SEE KEE OON Cambridge First Class is not as good as Tan Siong Thye?
Otherwise why MR MICHAEL KHOO SC was not promoted to High Court?

I invite brothers for comments.
 

NoNewsGood

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tey was summarily dismissed. That was wrong since Tey should have been given the opportunity to present his case to NUS before the sack.

I think the Court could only order NUS to give Tey an opportunity to present his case but the Court cannot order NUS to give him his job back.

NUS may just give Teh that opportunity but in the end still sack him.
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
I agree. Tey upset some powerful people and they went for him. Surprise that he got off.

The reasoning of the trial judge for his verdict is absolutely ludicrous. That trial judge should hang himself for stupidity. I suspect he is the laughing stock of the international judicail community.

Talk cock lah.

This loser got a vindictive personality even when he was Sub Court judge. A trouble maker in short.

When they 'deport' him to NUS his trouble making just won't stop and he brings the trouble to himself when his prick took over his thinking. LoL
 
Top