• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Tan Kin Lian super stingy!!

RonRon

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
3,634
Points
0
SINGAPORE: Getting their names and faces out to the electorate within the nine-day campaign period was a top priority for all four candidates in the August Presidential Election, with advertising and printing of promotional materials constituting the bulk of their expenses.

The expenses filed by the candidates were made available for inspection at the Elections Department on Tuesday.

The top spender was Dr Tan Cheng Bock, who spent S$585,045.03 on his campaign. More than 86 per cent of that went to traditional publicity material like posters, as well as novel means such as smartphone apps.

President Tony Tan Keng Yam was the next highest spender at S$503,070.

58 per cent was spent on promotional material, such as the ubiquitous black-framed-spectacle magnets and caps, and some S$50,000 on new media advertisements, such as those found on Google and Facebook.

Mr Tan Jee Say spent more than S$162,337, with nearly 45 per cent of it on advertising and publicity.

Mr Tan Kin Lian was the leanest spender, doling out about S$70,912.16 on his campaign, or merely 3 cents on each of the 2.27 million registered voters.

-CNA/ac
 
No wonder his top supporter Ramseth also runroad even before campaign started LOL
 
Penny wise, Pound foolish......he really learn his lesson well!
 
Kind of bear a close correlation to their votes, except that I think TT's costs must actually be higher if you take into account the resources of the govt machinery that have been exploited.
 
He has a 4d website, it was only prudent that he spent so little, why throw good after bad. he knew the odds
 
What happened to the donation money he received ?
 
I agree with you that TT incurred more, but circumvented the technical classification of respective candidates expenditures thru other apparatus.

But most dumb dumb sinkies will take the report as it is.......without thinking any further...... I hope not.

Kind of bear a close correlation to their votes, except that I think TT's costs must actually be higher if you take into account the resources of the govt machinery that have been exploited.
 
Back
Top