He fumbled (as did TKL) in the first segment but came back strongly later. Janadas tried intimidating (and to prove that he is worthy of his new position) him but not quite successfully with him as with TKL, who crumbled and agreed with his comments.
It's a fact that TJS did not do well in the CNA esp. when he did that wrongful punch onto TT (TT was a minister not President when the casino debate was in the parliament). TKL fumbled initially also but managed to recover. It is interesting that for the first time, TKL started to copy TJS 'check and balance on the Govt' approach - despite accusing TCB of stealing his idea on the voice of the people!
TCB did well, TT seems to know the questions before hand...
Janadas hands on the table are tell-tale signs of his own nervousness for most parts of the session - wonder who is causing him to be nervous?
Tommy Koh is an excellent moderator.
Debra is fearsome.
Well, despite all that, my vote is still incline towards the one that would be a
catalyst for the Govt to be checked and balanced. Status quo or even Wee Kim Wee or Ong Teng Cheong like governance is simply not good enough.
Singaporeans need to be aware that whichever EP we select, the Govt will still have the prime power over Singapore policies - that's a fact. However, the psychological impact of one who is will check and balance the Govt is good for Singapore... will likely have to say Sorry to TCB also, soon.