• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sylvia Lim has suggested 25% income tax for those earning above $1 million.

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]Sylvia Lim has suggested 25% income tax for those earning above $1 million.[/h]
.................
tongue.png


By Andrea Ong

Workers' Party chairman Sylvia Lim said on Tuesday that while she acknowledged the move towards a more progressive tax system, there is room for more to be done.

She said that a progressive tax system would reduce cost pressures in other areas and send an important psychological signal that the nation believes in the "stronger helping the weaker", said Ms Lim (Aljunied GRC), who was the first opposition MP to speak in the Budget debate.

She laid out several proposals including tweaking the income tax tiers. Currently, the highest tier of income tax charges 20 per cent for taxable income exceeding $320,000, noted Ms Lim. However, she said there is scope for more differentiation at the top as this threshold captures many professions, from university professors to top bankers.

She suggested having more income tax levels for top earners, ranging from 20 per cent for those earning $320,000 to $500,000 to 25 per cent for those earning above $1 million. These levels are still competitive compared to other countries while Singapore has other incentives for high earners such as its low corporate tax rates, she said.

While this year's Budget goes some way towards introducing more progressive taxes on luxury cars and properties, Ms Lim said retirees who may have bought properties in good locations many years ago should not be unfairly penalised. She also highlighted a "loophole" in the property tax measures where the wealthy could buy many mid-range properties and pay less tax.

Ms Lim also cited a study of 54 countries by University of Virginia psychologist Shigehiro Oishi which drew a link between higher progressivity in tax systems and greater subjective well-being of citizens. The study ranked Singapore in the lower half of tax progressivity while Singaporeans' life satisfaction ranked lower than several other developed countries.

She ended her speech without indicating whether she supported or opposed the Budget.​
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Good idea. 25% of the millionaire income people is great. Face it millionaires and billionaires here do not even pay 10% of what they really earn. 3 country trade is used to make the profits seemingly disappear. Come on. China does FDI roundtripping and do you believe that SGP does not? We are very likely serving the same role as HK in this game - entrepot investment flow.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Oh no.... that would be socialism and anathema to those Republican, Ayn Rand types. :rolleyes:
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is stupid! WP should fight for no income tax!

To motivate the people, the WP should propose zero tax rate for income up to $50k. Then the progressive rates kick in at 10 percent for 50-100k, 15 pct for 100-200k, 20 pct for up to 500k, 30 pct for 500k - 1 mil, 40 pct for above that.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
To motivate the people, the WP should propose zero tax rate for income up to $50k. Then the progressive rates kick in at 10 percent for 50-100k, 15 pct for 100-200k, 20 pct for up to 500k, 30 pct for 500k - 1 mil, 40 pct for above that.

How can you do that? Rich people create jobs for lesser mortals. They not happy and leave, how? :wink:
 

MBSSLOTS

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This is stupid! WP should fight for no income tax!

exactly my sentiments...why the need for income tax when erp, coe and so much consumption based tax is already collected.

mind u, forecasted surplus for 2013 was 1.3billion.
but ACTUAL SURPLUS for 2012 was 3.9 billion!

what fuck forecast is this shit?
we have a PROFITEERING govt in charge!
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
A better system would be zero income tax for all.
20% tax for corporates with 5 year tax shelter for start ups.
All revenues should come from GST, import tax, COE, alcohol, cigarettes etc.
 

MBSSLOTS

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
A better system would be zero income tax for all.
20% tax for corporates with 5 year tax shelter for start ups.
All revenues should come from GST, import tax, COE, alcohol, cigarettes etc.

I do agree...let those crazy nuts who want to own car pay.
Let those who consume luxury goods pay.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A better system would be zero income tax for all.
20% tax for corporates with 5 year tax shelter for start ups.
All revenues should come from GST, import tax, COE, alcohol, cigarettes etc.

So, you believe the poor & lower income should pay higher taxes proportionately?

Can you stop bolding?
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
A better system would be zero income tax for all.
20% tax for corporates with 5 year tax shelter for start ups.
All revenues should come from GST, import tax, COE, alcohol, cigarettes etc.

Will stop posting with your large bold fonts. If you have something worthwhile to say, it carries the same weight if you post with default font size.

If you post rubbish, huge fonts is not going to make it any less trashy.

You have been warned.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
Will stop posting with your large bold fonts. If you have something worthwhile to say, it carries the same weight if you post with default font size.

If you post rubbish, huge fonts is not going to make it any less trashy.

You have been warned.


I don't post rubbish boss, I only post the truths.
 

chupacabra

Alfrescian
Loyal
The rich in peesai should be tax more solely because they make money off every sinkee, rich or poor. Yes sakae sushi boss creates jobs for FTs and sinkees but the wages pale in comparison to the money he makes off the very same poor sinkees. If he don't like it, he can EFF off from peesai because there are alot of sushi chain out there willing to take on his profit making in peesai.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I think punishing the rich for being successful is flawed principle no matter how you look at it.

A flat tax system is the fairest of all. If everyone is taxed at 10% of their income, the message sent out is that it is perfectly acceptable to be rich. Taxing the rich at a higher rate does exactly the opposite.

With a 10% flat tax, someone earning $100,000 a year pays $10,000 in taxes and those being paid a million a year pay $100,000 in taxes so the rich always pay more anyway without having to introduce a higher tax bracket.

It also simplifies the whole system which means money can be saved by getting rid of all the overheads and red tape involved in enforcing and policing complicated tax structures.

Corporate tax should be taxed at the same rate too so that there is no difference in declaring earnings either as corporate income or personal income. Many accountants will go broke but it will mean they can start doing jobs that are more productive than just massaging numbers.

With the current tax laws in NZ, I spend $2000 per annum on an accountant who saves me $10,000 a year. A flat tax would do away with the need for a tax accountant. I'd do my own taxes.
 
Top