I thought the legal profession decided to do away with this robes and wigs thing a long time ago....why the need for all these formal (read as needless) accoutrements??
Judges wearing robes makes them more special than the lawyers that they rule over? So the lawyers need not wear robes but the judges should in the sub courts?......
Am i missing something here??
Judges wearing robes makes them more special than the lawyers that they rule over? So the lawyers need not wear robes but the judges should in the sub courts?......
Am i missing something here??