true or false?
I find it hard to believe
did they use 'creative' counting to arrive at this figure again?
Misleading statistics once again. For one, it does not say whether real income has been maintained.
If a manager who was retrenched last year, is employed as a cleaner this year, is this better?

Spore has no unemployment benefits, the authorities can conveniently ignore large segments of the unemployed
He is not gainfully employed.
But WDA and NTUC will tell you that a job is better than no job, and you'd best be less choosy.
true or false?
I find it hard to believe
did they use 'creative' counting to arrive at this figure again?
Johnny333 said it, Singapore has no unemployment benefits. Since we dont have unemployment benefits U think pple can afford not to work???
If you want to know whether true or not, just look at the pple around U and their friends and relatives, do U see widespread unemployment? If unemployment rate is really bad then you will at least know some pple that are getting affected.
There are no pensions in Singapore either. Can old people afford to retire if they have no pensions?
It's savings, you twit. That's how people can "afford" not to work after retirement or periods of unemployment.
Let's see. About 1 in 10 working age men unemployed, 2 in 5 underemployed/self-employed (yes, many one-man businesses are frequently bad substitutes to employment) and increasingly more women (with or without children) staying at home. Would you then acknowledge my experience to be representative of the population, or will you then say "Oh! It doesn't agree with the population sample, so it must be a biased sample."
Do you admit you do not wish to acknowledge it even if you witness it yourself?