• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

State Courts apologises to man after he spends two extra days in prison due to administrative error

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How come million-dollar ministers cannot build a first-class administrative service?

State Courts apologises to man after he spends two extra days in prison due to administrative error
Mr Teo Seng Tiong paid the fine and began serving his jail term on July 20, 2020.

Mr Teo Seng Tiong paid the fine and began serving his jail term on July 20, 2020.PHOTO: ST FILE

Jean Iau

SINGAPORE - The State Courts has apologised to a lorry driver after an administrative error caused him to remain in jail for two extra days.

Mr Teo Seng Tiong, 59, was sentenced on Jan 14 to seven weeks' jail and a fine of $500 for swerving his lorry into a cyclist and failing to make a police report within 24 hours of the accident.

The State Courts said in a statement on Wednesday (Sept 2), that Mr Teo's appeal was dismissed by the High Court in July and he paid the fine and began serving his jail term on July 20.

Despite the High Court notifying the State Courts that the fine had been paid, the State Courts officer in charge of the case failed to update the State Courts' case management system to reflect it.

On Aug 21 and 22, the Singapore Prison Service (SPS) checked with the State Courts on whether the fine had been paid, and owing to the earlier error, the State Courts informed SPS that the fine had not been paid.

As a result, Mr Teo ended up staying longer in jail than he should have. During sentencing, he was told if he was unable to pay the fine, he would have to serve another three days behind bars.

"The State Courts deeply regret what has happened, and we have conveyed our letter of apology to Mr Teo through the Attorney-General's Chambers.

"When the error was discovered, the State Courts took immediate steps to review our work processes governing fines for State Courts cases that have gone on appeal to the High Court," State Courts said in the statement.

It added that it has since implemented further safeguards, such as additional levels of checks, as well as commenced an internal review of the matter.

"Depending on the outcome of the review, appropriate action (including disciplinary action) will be taken."

The error was discovered only when Mr Teo's lawyer, Mr Tan Hee Joek, sent a receipt of the payment for the fine to SPS.

Mr Teo was released on Aug 24 morning.

The Straits Times has contacted Mr Tan for comments from his client.
 

knnccb

Alfrescian
Loyal
another vehicle vs cyclist episode, this one is a big lorry so cyclist if want to play bo hua will literally uplorry
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
He should be able to ask for compensation from the Government right? I remember a chap kena few extra strokes of the rotan while he was serving his sentence. He sued the Government, Prison Service. He managed to get an undisclosed amount from the Govt.
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
if unable 2 pay $500 fine, he'd have 2 spend 3 days in jail ... dat means $166.67 per day ...

now a mistake was made n he spent sextra 2 days in jail ...

n he got juz n apology 4 tis? ...

dey shud compensate him $333.33 ($166.67 per day x 2) 4 dat sextra 2 days ...
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Why should the State Court apologise? That loser deserves to be incarcerated even longer.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
He should be able to ask for compensation from the Government right? I remember a chap kena few extra strokes of the rotan while he was serving his sentence. He sued the Government, Prison Service. He managed to get an undisclosed amount from the Govt.
Young man received about 70k for the extra strokes. Can’t recall his name.
 

knnb40

Alfrescian
Loyal
why cannot disclosed the amount ?
didn't the million dollars state that Singapore is open and transparent ?

Who decide and agree the undisclosed amount ? the minister or the public servant ?
if the public servant decide, means the minister cannot know ?
if the minister decide, so this is also top secret ?
 
Top