ST refuses to publish Ravi Philemon’s reply to MCI’s letter on ST

[Confuseous]

To date, the newspaper has not published my reply to the MCI’s Director of Corporate Relations.

In the polemic arguments about if I had reposted a friend’s post on Facebook verbatim, or if I had falsely reported, regarding the availability of N95 masks on Friday, 21 June 2013, I have so far only presented facts.

My responses are here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/yaacob-in-crisis-isnt-it-good-to-engage.html

here: http://www.raviphilemon.net/2013/07/response-to-minister-for-communications.html

And here: http://www.straitstimes.com/premium...larifications-online-blogger-replies-20130717.

I wonder why Mr Peer is puzzled by my explanations? I also wonder why my putting forth of facts to bring more clarity on the topic has been dismissed by MCI’s Director as trying to explain my deeds away.

I feel compelled to respond to Mr Peer’s letter to the Straits Times Forum page in a measured and appropriate manner to ensure that his serious charges against me do not remain unrebutted.

My unpublished letter to ST Forum:

- http://www.tremeritus.com/2013/07/2...sh-ravi-philemons-reply-to-mcis-letter-on-st/

 

[ray_of_hope]

Will Ravi be an NSP candidate in GE2016?

 

[laksaboy]

Journalism vs public relations.

 

[I_Hate_Pappies]

Who buys Straits Times nowadays?