- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
<TABLE id=msgUN cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - ST censors Tan Jee Say抯 press statement</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF noWrap align=right width="1%">From: </TD><TD class=msgFname noWrap width="68%">kojakbt_89_ <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate noWrap align=right width="30%">1:57 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT noWrap align=right width="1%" height=20>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname noWrap width="68%">ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 6) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%" rowSpan=4> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>54121.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt id=msgtxt_1>Straits Times censors Tan Jee Say抯 press statement
July 16th, 2011 |
Author: Temasek Review |
Edit
While Straits Times 慾ournalist?Tessa Wong was quick to quote 慳nonymous?sources to smear presidential hopeful Tan Kin Lian one week ago, she failed to use the sources made available to her even when they were widely circulated on the internet.
In her article published in the Straits Times today entitled 揂nother Tan joins the fray? Tessa Wong did not bother to reproduce the key points in pro-Singaporean leader Mr Tan Jee Say抯 press statement posted on his blog yesterday saved for the opening paragraph that he is contesting the election on behalf of Singaporeans who want a president independent of the PAP.
In contrast, the Straits Times published most of PAP-endorsed candidate Tony Tan抯 press statement when he first announced his candidacy.
Instead of focusing on the most important part of Mr Tan抯 statement calling for a candidate with moral authority to check on the PAP regime which has lost its 憁oral compass? Tessa Wong chose to question Mr Tan抯 eligibility to contest in the presidential election.
揙ne of several ways to be eligible to run for president is to have headed a company with at least $100 million paid-up capital, for at least three years. Alternatively, he could have held a comparable position in an organisation of equivalent size or complexity,?Tessa wrote.
It is highly unlikely that the PAP-controlled Presidential Election Committee (PEC) will allow Mr Tan to contest as his company did not have $100 million dollars in paid-up capital when he was there.
The stringent criteria for the eligibilty to contest in the Presidential election such as being a former minister is specifically put in place to ensure that the PAP is able to get its own candidate into the Istana as a form of 慽nsurance?for the repressive regime to maintain its stranglehold on the nation in the event of a 慺reak?election. To put it bluntly, the Elected President is there to safeguard the PAP抯 future rather than Singapore抯 reserves.
Read Mr Tan Jee Say抯 press statement here
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt noWrap width="24%">
Options</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>



While Straits Times 慾ournalist?Tessa Wong was quick to quote 慳nonymous?sources to smear presidential hopeful Tan Kin Lian one week ago, she failed to use the sources made available to her even when they were widely circulated on the internet.
In her article published in the Straits Times today entitled 揂nother Tan joins the fray? Tessa Wong did not bother to reproduce the key points in pro-Singaporean leader Mr Tan Jee Say抯 press statement posted on his blog yesterday saved for the opening paragraph that he is contesting the election on behalf of Singaporeans who want a president independent of the PAP.
In contrast, the Straits Times published most of PAP-endorsed candidate Tony Tan抯 press statement when he first announced his candidacy.
Instead of focusing on the most important part of Mr Tan抯 statement calling for a candidate with moral authority to check on the PAP regime which has lost its 憁oral compass? Tessa Wong chose to question Mr Tan抯 eligibility to contest in the presidential election.
揙ne of several ways to be eligible to run for president is to have headed a company with at least $100 million paid-up capital, for at least three years. Alternatively, he could have held a comparable position in an organisation of equivalent size or complexity,?Tessa wrote.
It is highly unlikely that the PAP-controlled Presidential Election Committee (PEC) will allow Mr Tan to contest as his company did not have $100 million dollars in paid-up capital when he was there.
The stringent criteria for the eligibilty to contest in the Presidential election such as being a former minister is specifically put in place to ensure that the PAP is able to get its own candidate into the Istana as a form of 慽nsurance?for the repressive regime to maintain its stranglehold on the nation in the event of a 慺reak?election. To put it bluntly, the Elected President is there to safeguard the PAP抯 future rather than Singapore抯 reserves.
Read Mr Tan Jee Say抯 press statement here
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt noWrap width="24%">