• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Spies Like Us: Friends Always Spy on Friends

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
With all the fuss and hullabaloo on US on spying allies, the knife cuts both ways too. Interesting read from backdated Time artice.:p

Spies Like Us: Friends Always Spy on Friends
NSA spying on U.S. allies is impolite, but it’s not a scandal
By Michael Crowley @CrowleyTIMEOct. 31, 201310

Nearly a century ago, long before the National Security Agency existed, there was the Black Chamber. Founded after World War I, the New York City–based office — formally called the Cipher Bureau and disguised as a commercial company — existed to crack the communications codes of foreign governments. The bureau closed in 1929, a decision Secretary of State Henry Stimson later justified with the quaint declaration: “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail.”

More than 80 years later, that warning is haunting President Obama. New revelations from fugitive NSA leaker Edward Snowden have exposed extensive U.S. surveillance on overseas allies, including a program that targeted 35 foreign leaders, even tapping German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone. Not very gentlemanly at all.

That has fueled a push in Congress to rein in the NSA. An infuriated Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman — often a defender of the NSA — announced “a major review” of all U.S. intelligence operations. “The reports are very disturbing,” Republican Senator Susan Collins told ABC News. “Friends don’t spy on friends.”

Yes, they do. The latest NSA flap may be less a story about a spy agency run amok than a peek into a world where for political leaders, the walls (and phones, tablets and laptops) always have ears. “All big countries use espionage, and some of the countries that are complaining spy on the U.S.,” says James Andrew Lewis, a former American diplomat now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. It’s not that countries think their friends are plotting against them; their aim is to gain insights into coming policy shifts or learn tidbits about third-party rivals.

Consider the now forgotten story of Echelon. In 2000, European leaders raged at reports that the U.S. was covertly gathering data on the continent’s economic activity. A report commissioned by the European Parliament condemned the U.S.’s activities. But in the game of foreign surveillance, there are few clean hands. In 2004 a former British Cabinet minister alleged that U.K. agents had bugged the office of U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan. An official document leaked to a British newspaper in 2009 showed that the U.K. was a high-priority espionage target for 20 countries — including chums like France and Germany.

America too is a routine target of its allies. At a 2009 NATO summit in France, Obama’s aides ditched their BlackBerrys, presumably for fear of eavesdropping. In 2010, National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair proposed an espionage cease-fire with the nosy French on the grounds that the two countries were wasting valuable counterintelligence assets dueling each other that were better applied to nations like China and Russia. (The White House shot down the idea.)

After French officials railed at a report that the NSA had scooped up millions of phone-call records from their country, France’s former top intelligence official Bernard Squarcini scolded them. “I am amazed by such disconcerting naiveté,” Squarcini told Le Figaro. “The French intelligence services know full well that all countries, whether or not they are allies in the fight against terrorism, spy on each other all the time.” (Further muddying the morality, U.S. officials insist that France and Spain collected the data themselves and passed it along to the NSA.)


The bugging of foreign leaders has had particular power because it seems so personal. Obama has befriended Merkel, for example, so the snooping on her cellphone carries a whiff of betrayal. Which is why Obama is reportedly weighing a ban on tapping friendly heads of state.

Intelligence insiders say that would amount to unilateral disarmament by the U.S. “Let’s be honest — we eavesdrop too. Everyone is listening to everyone else,” former French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner told France Info radio. If the NSA earns special scorn, he added, it’s because “we don’t have the same means as the United States — which makes us jealous.”
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The closer the relationship, the more spying there is. Spouses spy on each other all the time.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
google and yahoo "data-mine" my online access like reverse osmosis membranes sifting through shit water in the production of newater. :p

everytime i search the web for lactobacillus or acidophilus based probiotics, both gmail and yahoomail spam me with adverts and banners on "smooth bowel movements"! :eek: now just the simple act of getting online gives me banner spams on matters relating to "shit". they know me in their database as "mr. shit". :o
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Take it from yours truly - spying happens all the time regardless of friendly or unfriendly countries. The more friendly ones are those who can hurt you more because oftheir proximity to you in many ways. The more unfriendly a country is, the less likely it will do you damage. You are always on guard.

Why spy on friendly states? Very simple answer. No harm knowing their bargaining position if there is an issue. No harm to gather intel for the sake of intel - always the case. How else can these intel agencies exist? Spy on enemies only? 90% would be jobless. Singapore is no different, be it ISD or SID.

Found it a big joke when those supposedly spied by the US kpkb. What a bunch of fuckers! They themselves are doing the same. What Snowden disclosed is nothing shocking. Existed decades and decades ago. Nothing sensational imho.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sometimes no threat at all but some people in the organisation will keep on pursuing their 'leads' to make themselves feel important coz they have nothing much to do anyway. I witnessed these before. Easy to hide your real intent when it is a need-to-know basis culture.
 

yinyang

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
All part of intrigue. You spy, I spy too.

No diff from cold war era
 
Last edited:

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Espionage is one of the oldest professions. Since biblical times. No one ever said cannot spy on friends or friendly subjects. Why the big deal and all the wayang over something that existed all this time.
 

PrinceCharming

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sometimes no threat at all but some people in the organisation will keep on pursuing their 'leads' to make themselves feel important coz they have nothing much to do anyway. I witnessed these before......

Very true indeed.

There is this senior police officer who has been pursuing a lead for the past 26 years. His supervisors had, before his retirement, told him to drop it. The only motive that keeps him going is for him to make himself feel important and useful to the institution and LEEgime.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Very true indeed.

There is this senior police officer who has been pursuing a lead for the past 26 years. His supervisors had, before his retirement, told him to drop it. The only motive that keeps him going is for him to make himself feel important and useful to the institution and LEEgime.

Just curious - lead on criminal case or one dealing with solely intel?
 
Top