SPH say singaporeans annoyed by american diplomat remarks

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,746
Points
0
Apr 29, 2010
I wasn't criticising S'pore
By Jeremy Au Yong
http://www.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/image/20100429/david.adelman.jpg

COMMENTS he made about Singapore's political freedom two months ago annoyed many in Singapore.

So Mr David Adelman, on his first day on the job as United States Ambassador to Singapore, spent much of his first meeting with the Singapore media mending fences.

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, he stressed repeatedly that his earlier remarks - on how he would use public diplomacy to promote political freedom in Singapore - were not an attempt to interfere in local politics.

He had earlier presented his credentials to President SR Nathan at the Istana. The 45-year-old former state senator of Georgia said his statement was simply an expression of his pride in the American system. It was not a specific comment about Singapore.

He said: 'My comment is a comment that could be made by any ambassadorial nominee to virtually any post across the world, which is, we value the United States, our press freedoms, our freedoms of assembly and our multi-party democracy and we believe it's a great example of a working democracy that has been ... a constructive force around the world.'

Read the full report in Friday's edition of The Straits Times.
 
I am not annoyed as he is speaking the truth.

Those who are really annoyed are the fuckin dogs and cats and the ministers working for the PAP government!
 
to defeat pap, opposition should not waste time to get vote from the peasant, and target their energy to american Ambassador , EU Ambassadors and japan Ambassador. Once opposition can use their influence to prevent pap from using judges, police and army to target them. Victory will be possible.

vote will get them nowhere, if the condition is not right, we can name a few example, burma and thailand etc.
 
Back
Top