• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[SOLID PROOF] NEVER EVER TRUST PROPERTY AGENTS IN SINGAPORE

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
S'pore Property Agent Tried To Earn More By Lying To Client, Ends Up With $30k Fine
mustsharenews.com


It can be difficult to find a property agent you can trust these days. Sometimes, they act in their own interests instead of yours.

ngu.jpg


PropNex Realty agent Ngu Ping Chuan James Ethan was handed a $30,000 fine and 12-month suspension for his dishonesty. This is according to a media release from the Council of Estate Agencies (CEA).

His actions reportedly caused his then client, who was looking for a house, to lose about $20-30k.

Property agent took commission from client

In 2016, a client engaged Ngu to help look for a home with a price tag of around $900,000.

In Mar 2017, the same client viewed a condominium unit in the east which was priced at $1.04m. His client liked the house and told Ngu to ask about the commissions payable.

Ngu met up with the seller’s agent, who told him that the seller was willing to sell the property for $1.02m and pay Ngu a 1% commission. But Ngu wanted 2.5-3% instead. So he didn’t tell his client about the offered price.

Ngu then negotiated, without his client’s instruction, for $1.04m and a 4% commission. The seller rejected the offer and counter-offered $1.01m but Ngu collected his commission from his own client instead.

Since Ngu couldn’t get the commission he wanted, he advised his client against buying the condominium, explaining that the price was too high.

Client contacted seller directly

In the end, Ngu’s client had to contact the seller of the property directly and purchase the unit at $1.04m — $30,000 more than the $1.01m initially offered.

Image result for condo east
Picture for illustration purposes only
Source

For failing to convey the seller’s offers to his client and his conflict of interest (i.e. the commissions), Ngu was fined $30,000 and given a suspension.

Find a trustworthy agent

According to the media release from CEA, consumers should seek clarification about conflicts of interest with their agents before engaging them.

Consumers may also report agents whom they suspect to be unprofessional in their transactions. They may call the hotline 1800-6432555 or email [email protected].

One good way of making sure you get a good and trustworthy agent is by getting one through friends’ recommendations.

All the best to homeowners in finding a trustworthy property agent!

Featured image adapted from 99.co.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The title should be "Never trust a Chinese _______" and you can fill in the blank with just about anything you want.
 

rambo22

Alfrescian
Loyal
1571697120632.png


this one is their Mentor

what do you think ?

their company slogan also explain clear clear to u liao

Service You Trust

their agents words

Better You Think Thrice
 
Last edited:

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...james-ngu-fined-suspended-commission-12020174

SINGAPORE: A property agent has been fined S$30,000 and suspended 12 months for being unprofessional and unethical in a property transaction, said the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA) on Monday (Oct 21).
This is the highest fine and longest suspension meted out to a property agent, the statutory board said in a media release.
PropNex Realty agent Ngu Ping Chuan James Ethan, also known as James Ngu, 39, made offers to a seller of a condominium unit without his client's knowledge, and did not tell his client about the seller's counter-offers.
He also tried to negotiate a 3 per cent commission from the seller, but when the seller refused, he told his client not to buy the property.
THE CASE
Ngu was engaged by a client in 2016 to source for a home in the price range of S$900,000.
In March 2017, Ngu and his client viewed a condominium unit in the eastern part of Singapore priced at S$1.04 million. After the viewing, Ngu told the seller's agent that his client was keen on the property and asked about the commission payable to him.
The seller's agent informed Ngu that his client was willing to sell the property at S$1.02 million, and to pay Ngu a commission of 1 per cent, which was about S$10,000.
But Ngu said he wanted a commission of 2.5 to 3 per cent, and did not tell his client about the seller's offer. Instead, he told his client the property was valued at S$1.18 million on average and suggested an offer of S$1.06 million.
However, his client's own checks with a bank showed that the estimated value of the property was S$950,000 to S$1 million.

NGU WANTED 3% COMMISSION
In April 2017, Ngu's client told him to start negotiations for the purchase of the property on his behalf.
Two days later, Ngu told his client that he had conveyed an offer of S$950,000, but it was rejected. Ngu then told his client that the seller had made a counter-offer of S$1.04 million when there was no such offer made.
Without his client's instructions, Ngu told the seller's agent that his client was willing to purchase the property at S$1.04 million, with a commission of 4 per cent to be paid by the seller and shared between both agents. Ngu asked for 3 per cent commission for himself, which was about S$30,000.
The seller rejected the offer and offered instead to pay a commission of 2 per cent to Ngu, and 1 per cent to his own agent, which Ngu rejected. The seller's agent also counter-offered a sale price of S$1.01 million, with Ngu collecting commission from his own client instead, which Ngu did not convey to his client.
Ngu advised his client against buying the condominium unit, citing the high price, despite the actual reason being his failure to negotiate for himself a 3 per cent commission, CEA said.
His client eventually contacted the seller's agent directly and offered to purchase the property at S$1.04 million, which the seller accepted.
CLIENT SUFFERED LOSS OF S$20,000 TO S$30,000

CEA said Ngu's "wrongful conduct" caused his client to suffer a loss of between S$20,000 and S$30,000 in the transaction.
Ngu pleaded guilty to three charges under the CEA Code of Ethics and Professional Client Care – failing to convey the seller’s offer of S$1.02 million to his client; failing to declare in writing his conflict of interest in getting a co-broke commission; and failing to convey to his client the seller's counter-offer of S$1.01 million, with his commission to be paid by his client.
Five other charges were taken into consideration.
He was fined S$30,000 and suspended for 12 months for each charge, with the suspensions to run concurrently starting from Oct 16.

In its media release, CEA said consumers who choose to have a property agent should "seek clarification from their agents" if they have doubts on conflicts of interest.
"Consumers should be informed in writing of any conflict or potential conflict of interest which may arise at any time during the property transaction," CEA said.
"If there is indeed a situation of conflict of interest, consumers would have to give their consent to their property agents before their agents could continue to act for them."
Consumers who suspect agents to be unprofessional and unethical in property transactions can report them to CEA at 1800-6432555 or [email protected].
 
Last edited:

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
In March 2017, Ngu and his client viewed a condominium unit in the eastern part of Singapore priced at S$1.04 million. After the viewing, Ngu told the seller's agent that his client was keen on the property and asked about the commission payable to him.
KNN why the buyer's agent also collect commission from seller ? KNN my uncle thought is each party pays their own agent fees KNN
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Never ever grant exclusivity to any property agent when you sell your property. No matter how much trust you have in these vermin...:biggrin:
KNN if you never give exclusive they say you are not sincere then when you give it becomes their property temporarily KNN
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
KNN does anyone know why buyers and sellers are lazy to deal on their own for such a expensive item whereas they rather deal for cheap item on their own in carousell KNN
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sometimes when the money is too tempting to resist, a human can become a monster.
Without basic and solely depend on comm, they still need to eat
The real world is like royal rumble, every man for himself. :biggrin:
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PropNex Realty agent Ngu Ping Chuan James Ethan was handed a $30,000 fine and 12-month suspension for his dishonesty

So NPCJE will be back in action one year later. Wonder who will be his next victim? :wink:
 
Top