• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

So Dotard has no money for F-35 and will be scrapped or abandoned soon - Congress Auditors!

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.rt.com/usa/428946-no-money-for-f35/

‘No money for F-35,’ government auditors tell Congress
Published time: 6 Jun, 2018 18:33
Get short URL
5b182715fc7e9331028b460b.jpg

A Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II aircraft seen at the Paris Air Show. © Pascal Rossignol / Reuters
  • 4
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has recommended that Congress withhold funding for the F-35 program, saying the jet fighter is plagued with almost 1,000 deficiencies that must be resolved before production can begin.
The shortcomings include an ejector seat that can cause neck injuries, an unusable helmet-mounted display system, failing oxygen-supply systems and a mid-air refuelling probe that can break off during use. In total, the F-35 had 996 unresolved deficiencies as of January. Of these, 111 were considered ‘Category 1’ deficiencies - faults and flaws that could seriously jeopardize user safety or security.

With the F-35 due to enter full-rate production next year, at a cost of $10.4 billion per year for the next two decades, the GAO has recommended that no funds be made available for the next phase of production until these issues are fixed and until the Pentagon makes a sound business case for the funds.

The F-35 has been in development at Lockheed Martin since 2001, and it has been dogged by delays and surging costs ever since then. At an estimated lifetime cost of $1.4 trillion, it is the most expensive weapons development program in history.

Read more
Israel brags it is 1st state to use US-made F-35 in combat & ‘attacks on different fronts’
The structure of the F-35 development program has shifted several times throughout its lifespan, as costs began to mount. The GAO report partially blames the Pentagon and developer Lockheed Martin’s ‘concurrency’ model, under which the plane was being tested while new components were being produced, instead of being built to spec with proven components. Problems with individual components then led to delays and cost increases overall.

While the cost of the F-35 has been staggering, its story is a familiar one of waste and mismanagement at the Pentagon. In another report released last month, the GAO found that America’s new nuclear bomb, the B-61-12, will cost the government $10 billion, $2.4 billion more than the $7.6 billion touted by the National Nuclear Security Administration.

“I cannot right now look you in the eye and say that we can tell you that every penny in the past has been spent in a strategically sound manner,” Defense Secretary James Mattis told a class of graduating Air Force cadets in Colorado last month.

Even for a department as large and flush with cash as the Pentagon, $2.4 billion is a lot of money. This week, Mattis vowed to “clean up every problem” that an upcoming audit finds.

Read more
Cost of first-ever Pentagon audit to soar beyond $900 million
Mattis’ department is performing an audit this year, for the first time in its 70 year history. Over 2,000 independent accountants will pore over the Pentagon’s books to find out how a governmental department with a yearly budget of $700 billion can lose hundreds of billions of dollars to administrative waste. A full report is expected to be released in November.

In a memo sent to Pentagon employees last month, Mattis said: “every decision we make must focus on both lethality and affordability, thereby gaining full value from each taxpayer dollar spent on defense.”

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

  • 4
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is a total waste of money. If they put the money into other projects like modifications to the F15 or F 22 etc..they would have something better at half the price
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Agree that the F-35 is rubbish. The X-Wing or even the Colonial Viper would've been better choices.
 

tee_tah_beng

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.janes.com/article/80668/us-gao-recommends-congress-restrict-f-35-block-4-funding

Military Capabilities
US GAO recommends Congress restrict F-35 Block 4 funding
Pat Host, Washington, DC - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
06 June 2018
p1638539_main.jpg

GAO recommended that lawmakers withhold funding for F-35 Block 4 modernisation until the Pentagon provides a sound business case for the effort. Source: Lockheed Martin
Key Points
  • GAO recommends Congress restrict funding for F-35 Block 4 modernisation
  • The office said the Pentagon has not provided a sound business case for this part of the programme
The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommends lawmakers restrict funding for Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Block 4 modernisation until the Pentagon provides a sound business case for the effort.

The Pentagon plans to spend billions of dollars to modernise the F-35 with new capabilities. GAO, in its annual F-35 report released on 5 June, said the Pentagon is requesting USD278 million to begin that process before establishing a sound business case: a baseline cost and schedule estimate.

GAO made two recommendations. One is to direct the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) office to resolve all critical deficiencies before making a full-rate production (FRP) decision, which is due in 2019. The other recommendation is to direct the JPO to identify which steps are needed to ensure the F-35 meets reliability and maintainability requirements before each variant reaches maturity, and update the reliability and maintainability improvement programme with these steps.

The F-35 programme will defer action on some deficiencies found during the developmental testing until after entering FRP, which could add to additional programme costs. The Pentagon categorises deficiencies in two categories: Category 1 deficiencies are those that could jeopardise safety, security, or another critical requirement; and Category 2 deficiencies are those that could impede or constrain successful mission accomplishment.

GAO said that the JPO in early 2017 determined that not all open deficiencies found in developmental testing could be resolved within the cost and schedule of the developmental contract. Accordingly, the programme office and military services reviewed all open deficiencies and determined that about 30% of them needed to be resolved before completing development.

Want to read more? For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options at ihs.com/contact
 

tee_tah_beng

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.worldpronews.com/81161/1162/0/8cbc1b9b8b2dba12c9d6cbc29021ce6ae49f7747

‘No money for F-35,’ government auditors tell Congress
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has recommended that Congress withhold funding for the F-35 program, saying the jet fighter is plagued with almost 1,000 deficiencies that must be resolved before production can begin.

The shortcomings include an ejector seat that can cause neck injuries, an unusable helmet-mounted display system, failing oxygen-supply systems and a mid-air refuelling probe that can break off during use. In total, the F-35 had 996 unresolved deficiencies as of January. Of these, 111 were considered ‘Category 1’ deficiencies - faults and flaws that could seriously jeopardize user safety or security.

With the F-35 due to enter full-rate production next year, at a cost of $10.4 billion per year for the next two decades, the GAO has recommended that no funds be made available for the next phase of production until these issues are fixed and until the Pentagon makes a sound business case for the funds.

The F-35 has been in development at Lockheed Martin since 2001, and it has been dogged by delays and surging costs ever since then. At an estimated lifetime cost of $1.4 trillion, it is the most expensive weapons development program in history.

Read more

5b03d359dda4c8a2378b45d5.jpg

The structure of the F-35 development program has shifted several times throughout its lifespan, as costs began to mount. The GAO report partially blames the Pentagon and developer Lockheed Martin’s ‘concurrency’ model, under which the plane was being tested while new components were being produced, instead of being built to spec with proven components. Problems with individual components then led to delays and cost increases overall.

While the cost of the F-35 has been staggering, its story is a familiar one of waste and mismanagement at the Pentagon. In another report released last month, the GAO found that America’s new nuclear bomb, the B-61-12, will cost the government $10 billion, $2.4 billion more than the $7.6 billion touted by the National Nuclear Security Administration.

“I cannot right now look you in the eye and say that we can tell you that every penny in the past has been spent in a strategically sound manner,” Defense Secretary James Mattis told a class of graduating Air Force cadets in Colorado last month.

Even for a department as large and flush with cash as the Pentagon, $2.4 billion is a lot of money. This week, Mattis vowed to “clean up every problem” that an upcoming audit finds.

Read more

5a57e541fc7e9315378b4568.jpg

Mattis’ department is performing an audit this year, for the first time in its 70 year history. Over 2,000 independent accountants will pore over the Pentagon’s books to find out how a governmental department with a yearly budget of $700 billion can lose hundreds of billions of dollars to administrative waste. A full report is expected to be released in November.

In a memo sent to Pentagon employees last month, Mattis said: “every decision we make must focus on both lethality and affordability, thereby gaining full value from each taxpayer dollar spent on defense.”

If you like this story, share it with a friend!
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
They could have used the money to develop the F15 silent eagle. Much better than the F35 crap.

Yes, both the F-15 and F-18 are proven platforms. They are hardly obsolete at all. But I think the Pentagon is looking at stealth capability which they are lacking. In some ways, the F-35 looks like a combination of the F-15 and F-18.
 

maxsanic

Alfrescian
Loyal
The F-35 or earlier more commonly known as the Joint Strike Fighter seems to me more of a political exercise than anything else. The US has a fully developed 5th generation fighter F-22 program which started flight testing in late 1990s and was introduced into service in 2005. The F-35 program which has its first flight after the F-22 made it into service consists of ~10 other participating countries on top of US, none of which have any capability close to developing a 5th generation fighter program.

From a purely technical perspective, it is as clear as day that none of these non-US participants have any value add to the development except for some token financial funding. To keep up with the political show, the entire research and value chain has to take into account the varied political and military considerations of all these countries which makes an already sophisticated program much harder than it already is. This in turn drives up unit prices to unsustainable levels. Many countries who have earlier committed to procure are now being stretched to the brim just to buy and maintain a minimal fleet.

This has now descended into a strange case of every participating country knowing this makes no sense operationally, but feeling compelled to continue to pour political and financial capital for research and procurement as such a highly symbolic gesture of the western alliance cannot be seen to have failed. The US meanwhile is also using this as a convenient conduit to collect "protection money" from its dependent states, analogous to a common trick ancient Kings used to extort money from their subjects by compelling them to buy useless royal artifices and crown estates at ridiculously exorbitant prices.

For all the complaints and faults of the SAF, our airforce has indeed made a smart decision earlier on to go with a tested and proven US platform F15E rather than throw huge money down a political clown show that is ineffective, high risk and has no escape clause to get out.
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes, both the F-15 and F-18 are proven platforms. They are hardly obsolete at all. But I think the Pentagon is looking at stealth capability which they are lacking. In some ways, the F-35 looks like a combination of the F-15 and F-18.
They should just upgrade the F22. And F15. And maybe F16. The F18 is junk. Under powered n a shit dog fighter. With the amount of money wasted on the F35. They could all be upgraded n still have money left over to reduce the budget deficit
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal

Well said what should have been done is get 3 different planes for 3 different services..but try and standardise as many parts as possible. Like 30% standardisation. That will save heaps and be more effective. The USA is basically fucked if it goes to war with ah tiong land
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
They should just upgrade the F22. And F15. And maybe F16. The F18 is junk. Under powered n a shit dog fighter. With the amount of money wasted on the F35. They could all be upgraded n still have money left over to reduce the budget deficit
The F-22 was a good design but short-lived, only in production for a few years. And they couldn't export the thing due to some top secret tech. The F-18 is a fine aircraft, they even made a few variants. The super hornet has a bigger engine.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
The F-22 was a good design but short-lived, only in production for a few years. And they couldn't export the thing due to some top secret tech. The F-18 is a fine aircraft, they even made a few variants. The super hornet has a bigger engine.

Even much more expensive than F-35, Tak Boleh Tahan to pay.
It was estimated by the end of production, $34 billion will have been spent on procurement, resulting in a total program cost of $62 billion, around $339 million per aircraft. The incremental cost for an additional F-22 was estimated at about $138 million in 2009.
Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor - Wikipedia
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Indian should offer to buy 2000 n get to manufacture the junk then sinkieland buy 2000 huasong ICBM from my buddy pui pui Kim to manufacture. But I want 15% cut.
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
The F-22 was a good design but short-lived, only in production for a few years. And they couldn't export the thing due to some top secret tech. The F-18 is a fine aircraft, they even made a few variants. The super hornet has a bigger engine.

The super hornet is bigger that was why it had a bigger engine etc..it was built because the F18A could not meet its mission specs because it was under powered. If F18 soo good it would have been exported to more countries. The only other country using the super hornet is Australia n they got it as a stop gap measure bcos of the delays in the F35.
 
Top