• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SMRT fined S$100 for overloading bus (Yes, ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS)

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
SINGAPORE -SMRT has been fined S$100 by the authorities in the latest service standards survey for exceeding the number of passengers allowed on one of its bus services.

The infraction occurred last December when bus loading on SMRT service number 925 was 98.4 per cent, exceeding the 95-per-cent loading allowed during weekday peak hours.
Good lord. the gahmen should be looking at addressing the bigger transportation problems then worrking whether a bus overloaded by 3.4%!!!!! KNN)

Despite the single offence, SMRT was given a pass in the six-monthly Quality of Service (QoS) standards survey by the Public Transport Council (PTC). The other public transport operator SBS Transit passed as well.

The operators were assessed for reliability, loading and safety between December last year and May. In the previous review for June to November last year, SBS and SMRT were fined S$400 and S$800 respectively for not meeting the loading standard.

Operators can be fined S$100 for every loading or headway infraction as dictated by the QoS standards.

For failing to run at least 96 per cent of its scheduled trips for each bus service, operators can be fined S$1,000. For a high rate of accidents or bus breakdowns, operators can be fined S$10,000.

Compliance with the loading standard is assessed at the bus stop with the highest bus load during peak periods. The bus loading at that point is measured against the buses' licensed capacity to determine if it is within the stipulated 95 per cent.

"The actual performance of bus services is continuously tracked by the bus operators' computerised fleet operation and management systems," said a PTC spokesperson.

Performance reports of all bus services are submitted to the PTC for assessment every month.

The PTC also audits the operators' reporting processes to ensure that the reports are accurate and complete.

The current 95 per cent cap on bus loading will be reduced to 85 per cent at the end of 2014 under the Bus Services Enhancement Programme (BSEP), which will see more buses deployed.

Responding to queries, SMRT explained that the incident had occurred as they had experienced a shortage of bus drivers during the period of the incident. The operator assured that it closely monitors the passenger loading patterns of their bus services and conducts regular reviews on bus capacity to cater to changes in passenger numbers.

TODAY newspaper
 
For every overloaded bus caught....probably 100 cases got away....do the math....any business will gladly suffer the paltry fine and reap more profits. I dun take the bus but I thank the 60.1% on behalf of all bus commuters
 
Please lah this is more symbolic than actually punishment to let them know they are being watched. U really want them to kena fine 100m meh? Who do U think they will try to get the money back from?
 
SBS is another culprit, during peak hours their buses for almost all services are overcrowded. How come no fines? How come the drivers don't stop passengers from coming in? I seen so many SBS PRC drivers who drive overloaded buses almost everyday. This is not something new, it is a daily happening, but not fines for SBS, why?
 
Please lah this is more symbolic than actually punishment to let them know they are being watched. U really want them to kena fine 100m meh? Who do U think they will try to get the money back from?

Bro Char, next time if kana parking or kong, can ask for symbolic one too? :p

The money should come from dividend payout my friend. Try this, penalty = 50% of the dividend payout. It will hurt where it hurts most. The whole board of directors get the sacking and the whole company will wake up.

The 超级白 can freeze all fare adjustments. Period.
 
I am assuming all boarding and alighting are capture by the Ezlink card reader and therefore they can easily genereate a report for each and every bus services, the number of people on board and the time taken between each stop.

So if PTC are to implement base on that yardstick, then it seems fine to me, but the question is, did they? If not how come only one bus is caught overloading?
 
why nobody put crowded infrastructure on youtube to scare away potential immigrants?
 
Then who is going to fine PAP for overcrowding this island.
 
Back in the 70s and 80s, remember there was a sign in the bus that said something like this 'License to carry xx passengers sitting, xx passengers standing. 2 adults = 3 children per seat". Now there is no such display of the sign. The reason is obvious right? I remember the number of passengers allowed standing make it spacious, not like the current sardine packed bus. Just wait for one fatal accident, can guarantee it will revert back to the license.
 
Back in the 70s and 80s, remember there was a sign in the bus that said something like this 'License to carry xx passengers sitting, xx passengers standing. 2 adults = 3 children per seat". Now there is no such display of the sign. The reason is obvious right? I remember the number of passengers allowed standing make it spacious, not like the current sardine packed bus. Just wait for one fatal accident, can guarantee it will revert back to the license.

Yes, they still have those signs posted somewhere in the bus. You just have to look for them. Someone must be getting paid to post these useless things up ;)
 
Something that I've never heard about is the maximum number of passengers allowed in the trains.

What is this number:confused: Why hasn't SMRT ever been fined for overcrowded trains:confused:
 
Who says the drivers don't stop passengers from boarding? - just try during peak hours 7am to 8.30, see how many buses just pass by while you are late for work.

Question is why the buses so overloaded? - too many passengers or not enough buses. They used to survey passenger load, people counting numbers during peak hours. Don't see them anymore, presumably buses are overloaded anyway. These are sub service faults they committed, not merely a question of overloaded buses or a $100 fine.
 
Just wait for one fatal accident, can guarantee it will revert back to the license.[/QUOTE]

Fatalities and injuries already happened on buses when PRC/neh/pinoy drivers suddenly jammed hard on brakes, causing passengers to fall. If licence revoked, who will provide this service, considering buses are already overcrowed. Takes at least a few months for a new operator to run operations smoothly.
 
Just wait for one fatal accident, can guarantee it will revert back to the license.

Fatalities and injuries already happened on buses when PRC/neh/pinoy drivers suddenly jammed hard on brakes, causing passengers to fall. If licence revoked, who will provide this service, considering buses are already overcrowed. Takes at least a few months for a new operator to run operations smoothly.[/QUOTE]

Are there really pinoy drivers? So far only seen ah neh and PRC (extremely rude and dangerous) drivers!
 
Should fine them jiaklat jiaklat! Let them up the fare, let those public transport takers KPKB until the cow come home! Then i will ask them this question, who did you all vote for? :D
Limbeh park on bus stop 1am drink kopi with friend also kena $150 n 3 points! :oIo: $100 si simi lanjiao! Pui! :oIo:
 
Last edited:
It will be interesing to see the 'Schedule' of fines and the formula used for calculating the amount of the fine.

And not forgetting that it would have costs thousands to work out the number, issue the necessary letter after endless round of meetings.
THAT is productivity.
 
Bro Char, next time if kana parking or kong, can ask for symbolic one too? :p

The money should come from dividend payout my friend. Try this, penalty = 50% of the dividend payout. It will hurt where it hurts most. The whole board of directors get the sacking and the whole company will wake up.

The 超级白 can freeze all fare adjustments. Period.

I have seen A LOT of successful appeals to get minor traffic offence waived

Yeah try 50% and see disgruntled employees of those companies who loss their bonus and see their pay get cut vote for the opposition next GE. No political party is that stupid, not even the opposition. Yes the govt can freeze fare adjustments, the operators can also take measures to cut cost, like reducing bus frequency etc. Since they are going to be fine that amount anyway as long as they can ensure they cut enough cost to cover the max penalties, it's fine with them. Board of directors will feel nothing it's just the consumers and their employees who gets hit.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top