Serious Sinkies Must Prepare to Safe Guard Peace and Sovereignty!

[Pinkieslut]

‘Not business as usual’: Geopolitical shocks mean S’pore must be prepared for troubled times ahead, says Ng Eng Hen​

TODAY file photo
Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said that the risk of confrontation "is no longer trivial, let alone zero" and the Singapore Armed Forces is "working on that basis".

• The Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have set off geopolitical shifts with potentially grave implications, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said
• The retreat of globalisation and geopolitical tensions mean it is not "business as usual" for Singapore and her armed forces
• Singapore must use this period of relative peace to bolster the country’s defence, he added
• He was speaking to reporters on the eve of Singapore Armed Forces Day

BY

DARYL CHOO​

Published July 1, 2022
Updated July 1, 2022
WhatsAppTelegramFacebookTwitterEmailLinkedIn
SINGAPORE — Recent world events have resulted in a "geopolitical earthquake with potentially serious, if not grave, security implications", and this means it is "not business as usual" for the security of a small country such as Singapore, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday (June 30) in his annual interview on the eve of Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) Day, Dr Ng also outlined how the country should respond in the face of a "toxic milieu", with supply chain disruptions and inflation exacerbating "heightened security risks".

ADVERTISEMENT​

He pointed to the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine as the two main events that have plunged the world into a state of geopolitical flux.
“Entrenched foundations have been shaken and assumptions about the world and region we live in — that we have accepted and taken almost for granted — are now tested,” he said.
“I think in the months ahead, these geopolitical tectonic plates will shift further and may result in dramatic changes. As a small country, Singapore — particularly — must remain watchful and nimble.”

Ministry of DefenceDr Ng Eng Hen speaking to reporters on June 30, 2022.

READ ALSO​

SAF not affected by manpower crunch but is transforming work practices to draw young S'poreans: Ng Eng Hen​

Drawing on Singapore’s short history, Dr Ng drew comparisons between the heightened security risks today to the post-indepenence struggles of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) member states.
At the time, many Asean countries had just come out of colonialism, but proxy rivalries were in place because the global powers that had left continued to seek influence in the region.

ADVERTISEMENT​

“Included in those consequences were Konfrontasi, the sequelae to the British pull-out of Singapore, and the Vietnam war.”
There was also the Cold War and the Korean War, he added. “People forget also there was a significant buildup on nuclear capabilities that occurred transatlantic and also with China. And the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.”
Dr Ng noted, though, that the same period also brought about the first Nixon-Mao meeting in 1972 that set the stage for the United States’ normalisation of ties with China. And in 1999, the US also supported China’s ascension into the World Trade Organization.

GLOBALISATION UNDER THREAT​

Coming out of these tumultuous periods, Asean has had relative peace and progress for the last 50 years.

READ ALSO​

New Chief Digitalisation Officer to be appointed to lead SAF’s digital efforts​

This was perhaps because of the shared vision within Asean, Asia and external powers to build a global commons of trade, commerce as well as scientific and medical advances, Dr Ng said.

ADVERTISEMENT​

Trade increased between countries and there was cross-pollination of ideas.
With globalisation in vogue, the belief in Europe and Asia at the time was that even countries with different political ideologies — whether capitalist or communist party governments — could integrate economically. If they did so, the risk of confrontation would reduce sharply, Dr Ng said.
And on that basis, the European Union countries allowed themselves to be dependent on Russia for energy and on China for manufactured items.
Now, those hopes of economic integration and building global commons have "all but evaporated", particularly after Russia invaded Ukraine, Dr Ng said.
"There will be no more talk of cooperation, let alone integration, even from erstwhile devotees of this vision, like Germany."

ADVERTISEMENT​

READ ALSO​

70% of NSFs assigned to vocation they indicated interest in; 'not practical' for scheme to be extended to NSmen​

Germany, for instance, believed so much in the virtues of globalisation that it imported some 40 per cent of its energy supply from Russia.
This hope of integration in Europe today is instead being replaced by fear, intimidation and non-appeasement, he said.
“That’s the talk you hear. You can’t go down this road. You cannot buy from people who threaten you. If you respond with talks of cooperation while acts of aggression are taking place, then more will come.”
Asia is not immune to these changes, Dr Ng added. Already, alliances are reshaping and are being newly formed.
Some have also strengthened along different fault lines, he added. For example, there are the trilateral Aukus security pact among Australia, the United Kingdom and the US; the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue among Australia, India, Japan and the US; and the trade and finance agreements among Brics states — Brazil, China, India, Russia and South Africa.
“I’m sure that the reconfigurations are ongoing as we speak, as different countries change the calculus of geopolitics; the prism in which they used to see another country, whether he was a likely friend or foe.”
Against this context, the current inflation and supply shocks will test the political unity of many countries and their governments, Dr Ng said.
“It’s a toxic milieu. And in that toxic milieu, unexpected consequences can precipitate, as history teaches us.”
Around the world, countries have increased their military spending. Global military spending surpassed US$2 trillion (S$2.79 trillion) for the first time, he noted.
“We must expect increasing contestation in Europe. And in Asia, between the US and China. So when I say it is not business as usual, it’s anybody’s guess how long peace can continue in Asia,” he said.
"The risk of confrontation, it is no longer trivial, let alone zero, and we are working on that basis."

“
Singaporeans must gird ourselves for a troubled decade ahead or even longer.
Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen
”

HOW SHOULD SINGAPORE RESPOND?​

Singapore’s Ministry of Defence (Mindef) and SAF must be vigilant and make use of the current peace to strengthen the country’s defence, Dr Ng said.
One way is through defence diplomacy.
He noted that Singapore had inked seven new agreements at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue, which was more than in previous years. The country’s agreement with the US, Singapore’s strongest defence agreement, was also renewed in 2019, he added.
Last year, SAF also opened the Counter-Terrorism Information Facility, which brings countries together to share intelligence, monitoring and analysis capabilities.

Raj Nadarajan/TODAYSingapore’s Ministry of Defence and the Singapore Armed Forces must be vigilant and make use of the current peace to strengthen the country’s defence, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said.
Last year, the Asean Defence Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) approved the establishment of a Cybersecurity and Information Centre of Excellence in Singapore.
Singapore will also conduct the first ADMM-Plus chemical, biological and radiological conference in October this year.
Within SAF, large-scale overseas exercises have also resumed after Covid-related suspensions. Training in Brunei will also resume from August this year, Dr Ng said.
"So back to jungle training and I am sure many people are very much looking forward to that."
SAF is also embarking on upgrades of its platforms, including new Invincible-class submarines, with the first submarine to be delivered next year and F-35 fighter jets that will arrive in 2026.
A digital transformation across SAF is underway, with initiatives including maintenance process improvements in the Republic of Singapore Navy and technological and automation upgrades for various administrative processes in the army.
A fourth service, the Digital and Intelligence Service, is set to be established to bolster the country’s digital and cyber defence.
“Singaporeans must gird ourselves for a troubled decade ahead or even longer," Dr Ng said.
"The SAF will do its part — it will stand vigilant to guard Singapore’s peace and sovereignty.”

RELATED TOPICS​

DEFENCE SECURITY SAF MINDEF NG ENG HEN NATIONAL SERVICE
Read more of the latest in
SINGAPOREEXPLORE NOW

POPULAR​

SAF not affected by manpower crunch but is transforming work practices to draw young S'poreans: Ng Eng Hen​

New Chief Digitalisation Officer to be appointed to lead SAF’s digital efforts​

MasterChef Singapore Semi-Finalist, Who Had “No Idea What Michelin-Styled Dining Is Like”, Is Not Watching Cooking Competition Shows For A While: “They Trigger My Adrenaline”​

POV: To succeed, Forward Singapore has to win over sceptics​

Recommended by
https://www.ohmymag.co.uk/royal-fam...u_article_desktop_desktop_rtue&obOrigUrl=true

 

[laksaboy]

Singapore must use this period of relative peace to bolster the country’s defence, he added

More taxpayer money to be siphoned into the bottomless sinkhole that is the defence budget.

 

[Willamshakespear]

In 1974, while the newborn Singapore Armed Forces was still in its infancy, it was TESTED by terrorists in what is known as the 'Laju Incident'. A group of Japan Red Army terrorists hijacked & threatened to blow up Spore's then attempt to be an oil refinery hub to create jobs for citizens. They blew up explosives but did little damage, however, they hijacked a vessel - Laju with hostages onboard. Our armed forces was not ready then, & to save the lives of the hostages, the terrorists demands were met. SAF commanders vowed ' NEVER AGAIN '.

On 26th March 1991, Singapore & SAF was tested again on what was known as 'Operation Thunderbolt'. A group of Paki terrorist hijacked SIA flight SQ117 with 125 passengers & crew onboard. This time, SAF was ready, through much hardships, sacrifices & taxpayers funding with extreme training, the result was EVERY single Human onboard was rescued unharmed, despite fears over a previous airplane hijacking incident in Egypt in 1985 where the vaunted Egyptian armed forces KILLED several of the passengers on flight 648 in conventional warfare style battle with terrorists onboard in a mind blowing 7 days operation.

Although much had been speculated about SQ117 incident, with some, out of jealousy or ignorance, deriding that the Singapore Commandos only faced terrorists with kitchen knives, the reality was that not much information was known prior to the hijack which took a mere 8hrs to resolve while most were still asleep in Spore, on the armaments of the terrorists. Nothing was taken for granted by SAF commanders, more so when threat experts were called in to verify claims by the terrorists that they would pour liquor into the seats & carpets to start a fire. Should such happen, the non-fire retardant seats ( only upgraded to fire retardant after that incident) would be set ablaze, into the luggage compartments & then to the wings of the aircraft whereby jet fuel is located. The aircraft would explode into a fireball.

The Commandos were made aware of such, but NONE hesitated. Life is precious, more than ANY amount of salary paid by taxpayers can pay. They were willing to make the sacrifices, with trust in their commanders & harsh training that they had to endure daily unquestioned, & belief that they can save the lives of the passengers, everyone of them, even if the passengers were only strangers-local or foreigner, as to survive, it will never be a single individual's work, but the effort of all, TOGETHER, under various situations & circumstances. Within 30mins & actually earlier, the situation was brought under control, with all terrorists dead & all passengers rescued, unlike Egyptian flight 648.

This post is not about the heroics of SAF. They no longer need to prove to detractors, as evidences are clear on the effectiveness & dedication of our citizen army, nor does SAF believe in COMPLACENCY thru its harsh & rigid training methods, despite calls from sheltered kids & dotting parents, whom think they are the center of the Universe & everything revolves around them. It is NO easy task to turn boys into men, in our annual manhood rite of passage for survival of all - family, loved ones & friends..

There is a famous chinese saying - 养兵千日用兵一时 (translation- maintain an army for a thousand days to use it for a moment.) Would detractors of NS had prefer there is NO Spore army with necessary taxpayer funding for training, to give in to terrorists or to those who would bring harm to our family, loved ones. friends & our way of life? Would they had preferred SQ117 be blown up with all 125 fellow Humans by those insane terrorists, as done by those in USA on 911?

 

[mahjongking]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[zhihau]

There is a famous chinese saying - 养兵千日用兵一时 (translation- maintain an army for a thousand days to use it for a moment.)

Teehee... You never include the Operarasi Pukul Habis ah?

 

[tanwahtiu]

In 1974, while the newborn Singapore Armed Forces was still in its infancy, it was TESTED by terrorists in what is known as the 'Laju Incident'. A group of Japan Red Army terrorists hijacked & threatened to blow up Spore's then attempt to be an oil refinery hub to create jobs for citizens. They blew up explosives but did little damage, however, they hijacked a vessel - Laju with hostages onboard. Our armed forces was not ready then, & to save the lives of the hostages, the terrorists demands were met. SAF commanders vowed ' NEVER AGAIN '.

On 26th March 1991, Singapore & SAF was tested again on what was known as 'Operation Thunderbolt'. A group of Paki terrorist hijacked SIA flight SQ117 with 125 passengers & crew onboard. This time, SAF was ready, through much hardships, sacrifices & taxpayers funding with extreme training, the result was EVERY single Human onboard was rescued unharmed, despite fears over a previous airplane hijacking incident in Egypt in 1985 where the vaunted Egyptian armed forces KILLED several of the passengers on flight 648 in conventional warfare style battle with terrorists onboard in a mind blowing 7 days operation.

Although much had been speculated about SQ117 incident, with some, out of jealousy or ignorance, deriding that the Singapore Commandos only faced terrorists with kitchen knives, the reality was that not much information was known prior to the hijack which took a mere 8hrs to resolve while most were still asleep in Spore, on the armaments of the terrorists. Nothing was taken for granted by SAF commanders, more so when threat experts were called in to verify claims by the terrorists that they would pour liquor into the seats & carpets to start a fire. Should such happen, the non-fire retardant seats ( only upgraded to fire retardant after that incident) would be set ablaze, into the luggage compartments & then to the wings of the aircraft whereby jet fuel is located. The aircraft would explode into a fireball.

The Commandos were made aware of such, but NONE hesitated. Life is precious, more than ANY amount of salary paid by taxpayers can pay. They were willing to make the sacrifices, with trust in their commanders & harsh training that they had to endure daily unquestioned, & belief that they can save the lives of the passengers, everyone of them, even if the passengers were only strangers-local or foreigner, as to survive, it will never be a single individual's work, but the effort of all, TOGETHER, under various situations & circumstances. Within 30mins & actually earlier, the situation was brought under control, with all terrorists dead & all passengers rescued, unlike Egyptian flight 648.

This post is not about the heroics of SAF. They no longer need to prove to detractors, as evidences are clear on the effectiveness & dedication of our citizen army, nor does SAF believe in COMPLACENCY thru its harsh & rigid training methods, despite calls from sheltered kids & dotting parents, whom think they are the center of the Universe & everything revolves around them. It is NO easy task to turn boys into men, in our annual manhood rite of passage for survival of all - family, loved ones & friends..

There is a famous chinese saying - 养兵千日用兵一时 (translation- maintain an army for a thousand days to use it for a moment.) Would detractors of NS had prefer there is NO Spore army with necessary taxpayer funding for training, to give in to terrorists or to those who would bring harm to our family, loved ones. friends & our way of life? Would they had preferred SQ117 be blown up with all 125 fellow Humans by those insane terrorists, as done by those in USA on 911?

The PM LKY did not go hiding in bunkers and watch the news.... unlike his son, bunker hide from ahneh riot...

 

[Loofydralb]

Although much had been speculated about SQ117 incident, with some, out of jealousy or ignorance, deriding that the Singapore Commandos only faced terrorists with kitchen knives, the reality was that not much information was known prior to the hijack which took a mere 8hrs to resolve while most were still asleep in Spore, on the armaments of the terrorists. Nothing was taken for granted by SAF commanders, more so when threat experts were called in to verify claims by the terrorists that they would pour liquor into the seats & carpets to start a fire. Should such happen, the non-fire retardant seats ( only upgraded to fire retardant after that incident) would be set ablaze, into the luggage compartments & then to the wings of the aircraft whereby jet fuel is located. The aircraft would explode into a fireball.

Funny SAF wants some street cred killing 'terrorists' armed with firecrackers (they really had zero explosives nor weapons) and eating knives found on airplanes.

Other forces are actually sniggering.

In fact when Pulau Tekong, that island crawling with only soldiers, no civilians, was landed by armed criminals, the Ghurkhas was tasked to find them and neutralise them. While the SAF infested island went into lockdown indoors and the police twiddled their thumbs basically justifying it with "they're (Ghurkhas) paid to do it" attitude. How ironic.

 

[congo9]

Yes. SAF is the last resort, to neutralize civilian rebellion if there is one.

 

[Cottonmouth]

Safeguard his mother's cheebye.
He will be the first to be shot.

 

[congo9]

There are no resources in Singapore for other nation to take Singapore.
Maybe our strategic location is being sought after.

In a Nation of 5million in habitants, 3million are singkies, 2 millions are PR and foreigners. What is there to defend ?

 

[borom]

Defence very important ,so why not have NS for all-including women and all PR's and no citizenship can be awarded for people who do not serve NS.
Only those who have served NS can buy HDB flats

 

[JohnTan]

All male sinkies and PRs have sworn on oath that they will protect Singapore and our Constitution WITH OUR LIVES!!!

 

[syed putra]

Sinkie will be flattened first if there is a invasion. Like how russia doing in ukraine. Blow up the entire city, block by block to reduce casualties when the troops eventually capture the city.

 

[batman1]

O Yes ! O Yes ! NS For Sinkees and Jobs for Foreigners ! NS For Sinkees and Jobs for Foreigners !!!!!

 

[mudhatter]

Sinkie will be flattened first if there is a invasion. Like how russia doing in ukraine. Blow up the entire city, block by block to reduce casualties when the troops eventually capture the city.

NOTHING like how Russia is doing it.

Russkie bastards were brutal in Syria recently, in Chechnya, in Afghanistan. Let's not forget that for a moment.

In Ukraine, due to racial, religious ties, Russkies went soft and are still going soft. They could have levelled Ukraine in 7 days if they had wanted.

Malaysia and/or Indonesia only need 20k ballistic missiles from Iran and game would be over.

we're talking short range, tactical, highly accurate ballistic missile


Keeping stinkypura honest.
OR
Keeping stinkies honest.



Coolie gene, peasant race of rickshaw pullers, whores, harlots, opium addicts, drug peddlers, nightsoil collectors, boatmen, stevedores, errand boys stinkies should not wrongly believe that just coz they've allied with their ang moh masters incl zionist terrorists and yankees, that by default, whatever they're forcefed into believing is, by default, the unassailable, unchanging truth.


Just coz yankee-zionist terrorist propaganda says Iran possesses only a few hundred (who'd believe this nonsense) or a few thousand (less than 10k - again, who'd believe this?) ballistic missiles, doesn't mean their wishful thinking is the truth.


Here, I quote prices of all sorts of nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles from shortest ranges to full on ICBM from the cheapest and most open source of all - CECA virus. No other source of info is more open and offers a cheaper rate.

It is very like Iran or Norkies can produce them much cheaper but they are not open about their cost structure and rightly so. National security and all that

Others, like Yankees or Frog eaters might be more open than Iran or Norkies but their cost structures are inherently more on the expensive side.

Let's take a look.

SRBM - Praher ( range 150 km)
cost 5 crore ropee = 50 million ropee, abt $0.6-0.7 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $=80 ropee

ICBM - Ugh-knee-V (range 5000 km with 1.5 ton payload, about 7500 km with 1 ton payload) -
cost 50 crore ropee = 500 million ropee, abt $6-7 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $1=80 ropee


IRBM - Ugh-knee-3 (range 3500 with 1.5 ton payload, abt 5000 km with 1 ton payload)
cost ??

Ugh-knee-2 (range 2000 km with 1.5 ton payload abt 3000 km with 1 ton payload)

cost 35 crore ropee = 350 million ropee, abt $4.4-5 million at exchange rate of $1 = 70 ropee, or $1=80 ropee



these costs are valid for low rate production, not mass production

for mass production, cost per unit will decline

Iran has been in the business of mass production of ballistic missiles

due to economies of scale and economies of scope with the wide variety of ballistic, cruise and air defence (surface to air) missiles that Iran has developed (or copied or modified) and produced, cost per unit will be even lower

It is entirely reasonable that short range, tactical ballistic missiles such as Fateh-313, Hormuz-1, Hormuz-2 or such, in Iran, when mass produced, would cost less than $0.2 million or less, even cost $0.1 million


At a unit cost of $0.2 million, 20k tactical Hormuz-1 or Fateh-313 (or other SRBM) will cost merely 20,000 X $0.2 million = $4,000 million or $4 billion

Spread out over 20 years, let's say, this amounts to only $200 million per year

Really, peanuts!!!

If the unit cost of an SRBM (like Hormuz- or Fateh-313 or maybe Dezful or such) were $0.1 million, 20k tactical SRBM will cost merely 20,000 X $0.1 million = $2,000 million or $2 billion

Spread out over 20 years, let's say, this amounts to only $100 million per year

Again, even cheaper and really, no more than peanuts!!!


Cost per unit of CECA Ugh-knee-5 ICBM is only $6-7 million at low rate of production. when mass produced, cost per unit is bound to fall. perhaps, to $3-5(?) million per unit

If Iran (or norkies) produce ICBM at same cost of $5 million per unit in mass production, then 10k ICBM would cost 10,000 X $5 million = $50,000 million or $50 billion

Spread out over 20 years, this amounts to only $2.5 billion per year

Again, extremely cheap, no more than peanuts!!!


At a cost of $3 million per unit when in mass production, 10k ICBM would cost 10,000 X $3 million = $30,000 million or $30 billion

Spread out over 20 years, this amounts to only $1.5 billion per year


Now, you may say there are maintenance costs, training costs, logistics costs etc. Yeah they are there but by no means should those costs surpass 40% of the original cost of production of the ICBM. You can multiply each of these numbers above by 1.4 and the numbers still look like peanuts.


What about nukes? nuclear warheads?

In 1994 K. Subrahmanyam suggested that a force of 60 warheads carried on 20 Agnis, 20 Prithvis and the rest on aircraft would cost about Rs 1,000 crore over 10 years


1,000 crore ropees = 10,000 million ropees = $125-143 million over 10 years,

Spread out over 10 years, cost per year would be $12.5-14.3 million per year

That is the cost for 60 nuclear warheads

Producing and maintaining 60000 nuclear warheads would only cost $12.5-14.3 million per year X 1000
OR LESS

since economies of scale and economies of scope

come into play


Even if Iran (or norkies) were to maintain and operate a stockpile of 6,000 (six thousand) nuclear warheads, cost per year would be less than $1.25-1.43 billion per year.


All things considered, a force of 100k Short range/tactical/medium range ballistic missiles, 10k ICBM and 6k nuclear warheads would cost Iran (or Norkies etc) no more than

- for 100k SRBM, over 20 years, $0.5-1 billion per year
- for 10k ICBM, over 20 years, $1.5-2.5 billion per year
- for 6k nuclear warheads, over 10 years, $1.25-1.43 billion per year


By spending merely $3.25-4.93 billion per year, Iran can produce, stockpile, maintain and operate a massive
nuclear deterrent force comprising

---> 100,000 (one hundred thousand) short range/medium range tactical ballistic missiles
----> 10,000 (ten thousand) ICBM
----> 6,000 (six thosand) nuclear warheads.

What's not to like?

Stinkypura coolie genes peasantpore brainwashed monkeys still want to believe in your ang moh zionist masters' fairytale stories lullabies sold to toddlers and children?




the only plausible explanation for a lack of nuclear deterrent for 1900 million Muslims in OIC and 57 members of OIC is the theory of "IQ and Race"

Norkies have tested ICBM and nukes, why hasn't Iran? Dont tell me Iran is now afraid of sanctions embargo and isolation?

IQ & Race

 

[mudhatter]

for tiny countries like iran turkey and egypt, the problem is they are not good, as in best, in the world at anything significant.

mediocrity is the name of the game for them, they are too small to amount to anything

for bigger contries like Indon, Paki, Nigeria, Bangla, the problem is they dont have huge population (of 1 billion+ or 10 billion+) that they can sail past smaller countries on account of their huge populations alone

and they lack quality and talent as well.

so yeah the only plausible explanation is the theory of IQ and Race

nothing else explains, nothing else can explain why 1900 million Muslims, 57 OIC member still in 2022 christian era haven't got nuclear deterrence.

for these tiny countries like iran turkey or egypt, even at full potential, they might operate 500-700 4th gen/4.5 gen fighter jets.

useless in a fight against NATO which can easily bring 2000 modern fighter jets to the battle field. maybe more, incrase number to 5000.

solution is nuclear deterrence. absolute necessity is nuclear deterrence.

question is why can't these tiny and mediocre countries like iran turkey egypt unable to figure these calculations out?

IQ & Race


why 1900 million Muslims and 57 OIC members lack nuclear deterrence in this day and age (2022 in christian era)?

only one plausible explanation

IQ & Race



ask the ceca virus @ChristJohnny to share that image

IQ & Race

 

[mojito]

Why not ask ur precious FTs to safe guard pap and sovereign lee?

 

[ChristJohnny]

for tiny countries like iran turkey and egypt, the problem is they are not good, as in best, in the world at anything significant.

mediocrity is the name of the game for them, they are too small to amount to anything

for bigger contries like Indon, Paki, Nigeria, Bangla, the problem is they dont have huge population (of 1 billion+ or 10 billion+) that they can sail past smaller countries on account of their huge populations alone

and they lack quality and talent as well.

so yeah the only plausible explanation is the theory of IQ and Race

nothing else explains, nothing else can explain why 1900 million Muslims, 57 OIC member still in 2022 christian era haven't got nuclear deterrence.

for these tiny countries like iran turkey or egypt, even at full potential, they might operate 500-700 4th gen/4.5 gen fighter jets.

useless in a fight against NATO which can easily bring 2000 modern fighter jets to the battle field. maybe more, incrase number to 5000.

solution is nuclear deterrence. absolute necessity is nuclear deterrence.

question is why can't these tiny and mediocre countries like iran turkey egypt unable to figure these calculations out?

IQ & Race


why 1900 million Muslims and 57 OIC members lack nuclear deterrence in this day and age (2022 in christian era)?

only one plausible explanation

IQ & Race



ask the ceca virus @ChristJohnny to share that image

IQ & Race

I am glad you understand the concept of IQ in a Race or country.

To summarised : for a particular Race or country to prosper ... you need intelligent people. You need to have good diverse of electricians, plumber, locksmith, administrator, engineers etc etc. Imagine if all your population are road sweepers .... you can guess where this country is heading.

Race and IQ

 

[birdie69]

There are no resources in Singapore for other nation to take Singapore.
Maybe our strategic location is being sought after.

In a Nation of 5million in habitants, 3million are singkies, 2 millions are PR and foreigners. What is there to defend ?

We need our army to protect the CECA Indian talents, otherwise , they would not come here to contribute

 

[congo9]

We need our army to protect the CECA Indian talents, otherwise , they would not come here to contribute

PAP should be the greatest enemy of Singaporean.