• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Sinkie Judge Acquit Jiuhukia Of Rape Despite Overwhelming Evidence! Lucky Prosecution Appealed And Jiuhukia Rapist Will Now Face Jail + Rotan!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE - A 45-year-old man who was cleared in 2020 of raping his former girlfriend was on Tuesday sentenced to 13 years' jail and 12 strokes of the cane after his acquittal was reversed by the Court of Appeal.

The prosecution had appealed against the acquittal, arguing that the High Court had cleared the man in the face of overwhelming evidence against the accused.

Prosecutors argued that they had presented a plethora of evidence to corroborate the victim's compelling account, including witnesses who attested to the woman's trauma and distress immediately after the assault and medical experts who testified about the bruises on her neck.

The man's own conduct immediately after the incident spoke volumes about his guilt, said Deputy Public Prosecutors Ng Yiwen, Yvonne Poon and Selene Yap in written submissions.

He had sent her a flurry of messages, including 19 where he said "sorry", and begged her to withdraw her police report.

The Court of Appeal overturned the acquittal on Sept 13 and sentenced the man on Tuesday.

The apex court, which comprised Justices Judith Prakash, Tay Yong Kwang and Woo Bih Li, will set out its reasons for reversing the acquittal as well as the sentence in a written judgment at a later date.

The man was accused of raping the woman, then 29, in a rented HDB flat on Aug 6, 2017, while trying to strangle her.

He faced a charge of aggravated rape but was acquitted in June 2020 by Justice Pang Khang Chau, who said reasonable doubt had been raised over the guilt of the accused and that it was unsafe to convict him.

The man, who was defended by Ms Megan Chia, contended that they had consensual sex. He denied trying to strangle the victim, saying that he had given her love bites on her neck.

The man and the woman, now 34, were Malaysians working in Singapore who got into a relationship in 2012 and lived together in a rented three-room flat.

Their relationship soured in 2017, after the man was retrenched, and they broke up but he continued to stay in a separate room in the flat when he returned to Singapore to look for work.

He was on one such trip on Aug 2, 2017.

The woman testified that she avoided contact with him over the next four days and stayed at her aunt's place on Aug 4 and Aug 5.

On Aug 6, when she returned to the flat, he repeatedly questioned her decision to terminate the lease on the flat and move out by the end of month.

As they were talking, he slapped her, tore off her T-shirt and bra, and pinned her down on the bed.

He tried to strangle her with both hands and then raped her.

After the assault, he took her to a nearby clinic, where she told the doctor that the man had sexually assaulted her.

The doctor told the clinic assistant to call the police and the victim told the accused to leave.

After the man beseeched her to withdraw the police report, the victim reconsidered reporting him for the rape.

However, when she and her godmother returned to the flat and found him there, they called the police.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...l-caning-after-prosecution-succeeds-in-appeal
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's very clear that the fucking Sinkie judicial system is fucked up and a farce. Every verdict is dependent on the decision of one fucking judge/magistrate because they don't implement a Jury Panel system. It's definitely a fucking Kangaroo Court.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
It's very clear that the fucking Sinkie judicial system is fucked up and a farce. Every verdict is dependent on the decision of one fucking judge/magistrate because they don't implement a Jury Panel system. It's definitely a fucking Kangaroo Court.

I wouldn't trust a jury made up of oppie voters or mohameddans.
 

Byebye Penis

Alfrescian
Loyal
Since 2020, foreigners commit more rape, rape-attempts, sexual-assault and molest cases in Singapore, including workplace. Our court is so overwhelmed that many of these culprits only get their first hearing 6-12 months later, and they left Singapore by then.
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
I wouldn't trust a jury made up of oppie voters or mohameddans.
They may not be all oppie voters lah. Anyway, in this case when the original acquitted verdict can be so easily overturned and with the accused subjected to even more sentencing and repercussions (rotan) upon an appeal, this clearly showed that the fucking Sinkie's judicial system is seriously and severely flawed. The eventual verdict (against the original) is entirely a difference of between day and night. A BIG Fuck to the AG and its breed of fair share of Kangaroos in its stable.
 
Last edited:

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why are we wasting money to jail a foreigner? Might as well send them to the hangman straight. I am sure the ladies will be delighted and impress by our judicial system.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Interesting. I wanna read what the 3 judges saw in the evidence that they found no doubt to convict.

Because there is too many circumstantial evidence in this case.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Banana republic.

This is what you get a in a chink run state.

Chinks can't even run a postage stamp sized micro statelet.
 
Top