• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sinkie Ejaculated on Woman's thigh while on the Bus

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
>>> In any event, the Chinese men were fierce, and the female passenger was scolding him loudly. The Accused also recalled that his bag was searched, but he did not recall who searched it.<<<

Sporns being trampled by PRCs into nothing in own cuntry. *shake head*
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
>>>iii) Whether the Accused took his penis out of his shortss
63 Since the prosecution’s case was that the Accused brushed his penis against the victim’s thigh, they were clearly contending that he took his penis out of his shorts during the bus journey. The Accused denied this, and claimed that he would have had to untie the string of the waistband of his shorts to take his penis out of his shorts, presumably a difficult task in a crowded bus. I found this to be a mischievous and misleading claim, since Dr Lee stated that the opening of the Accused’s erect penis would point downwards. Thus, the Accused could have easily taken his penis out of his shorts through its leg openings, for he claimed that the shorts were old and loose, with a large space at each leg opening.<<<

=> How does this SPG judge draw the connection???
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
>>>>69 I also noted that the Accused claimed that he was dressed in a t-shirt and shorts, without underwear, because he had been dressed in that manner all day and he was only going to NUS to drop off an application form, intending go home immediately thereafter. It must then be asked why he needed to carry a jacket with him. He claimed that he did so in NUS because he usually went to lecture theatres and offices which were cold. However, by his own account, he was not going to attend any lecture or go into any office that evening; he was only dropping off an application form in his lecturer’s pigeon hole. If so, there was no reason for him to bring a jacket along. Next, since his bag only contained some CDs and a bottle of water, it must be asked why he needed to carry his jacket in his hand instead of putting it in his bag, which would clearly have been more convenient for public transport.

=> Lotsa people, especially SPGs, do that to act stylo mylo what!

Three facts, when taken together, resulted in an extremely unusual scenario: the Accused was not wearing underwear on the bus, he unnecessarily brought a jacket with him, then carried it in front of his crotch during the bus journey. These facts, when considered with what the victim felt and saw, left me with little doubt that the jacket was used for the express purpose of concealing his crotch when took took his penis out of his shorts and brushed it against the victim’s thigh.<<<

So one can be convicted cos of such silly facts?
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually it is very easy to know if he indeed has this condition. Ask him to demonstrate on the spot since his private part is so sensitive that it need not any action to ejaculate.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The SPG judge doesn't care that dude has a problem with his KKJ. She convicted him on the basis of him rubbing it against the PRC whore's thigh. But given the circumstances of a crowded bus and his leaky KKJ, has she established beyond reasonable doubt that he did it on purpose?
 

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
If this is what the judge had said, it means that there was no direct evidence to prove that a crime had been committed. She had passed her judgement against him based on a "possibility" that he had done so because of his other previous convictions.

If this is the court system that we have, it would be so easy to frame up others just because he had other criminal cases previously. It means, if you have criminal record, you will be deemed guilty of the charges brought against you until proven innocent?



District Judge Jill Tan was not convinced by Chong’s argument. She said in her judgement: “Even if the accused did suffer from a spontaneous ejaculation on the bus, this did not rule out the possibility that he could have brushed his penis against the victim’s thigh as well.”

http://temasekreview.com/2009/09/24...n-jailed-for-ejaculating-onto-china-national/
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
wow! creme of the cream material! UNI quali material some more. should ve donated his precious cum to the SPERM BANK. auntie jinx needs it badly for her nightly facial organic cream. what a waste!
 

SIFU

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually it is very easy to know if he indeed has this condition. Ask him to demonstrate on the spot since his private part is so sensitive that it need not any action to ejaculate.

wow lau bro,

steady lah.. u r the modern day 'bao qing tian'...:biggrin:
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
actually there was a phd nerd who called himself JIUYANGSHENGONG. he always told his mum: LOOK MUM, NO HANDS! and a cumshot would be fired out, hit and kill a lizard on the wall 10ft from his under weapon.:biggrin:

that's why now u find a very famous gecko on life support.
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
wow lau bro,

steady lah.. u r the modern day 'bao qing tian'...:biggrin:

It really puzzles me when he claimed that he did not even know he has ejaculated. So it is more like he leaks sperm like urine? It just flowed out? :confused::confused: I think the sun coming out from the West if that happens.

End of the day, I think his past conviction should be sufficient to know if he could be doing such feats or not. I mean he did make the girls touch his groin did he not? And it did not ejaculate.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Someone who has previous conviction will be doubly cautious. This guy con his class mates into thinking he went to prison for a mental condition. NUS students must be dumb enough to believe that a mental case can be convicted in the first place.

There many others that have convictions and have gone to jail and have changed their life by pursuing tertiary programs. They don;t go around telling their past to elicit sympathy.

He thinks he is smarter than others. AG already appealed against sentence and this guy is screwed.


It really puzzles me when he claimed that he did not even know he has ejaculated. So it is more like he leaks sperm like urine? It just flowed out? :confused::confused: I think the sun coming out from the West if that happens.

End of the day, I think his past conviction should be sufficient to know if he could be doing such feats or not. I mean he did make the girls touch his groin did he not? And it did not ejaculate.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Someone who has previous conviction will be doubly cautious. This guy con his class mates into thinking he went to prison for a mental condition. NUS students must be dumb enough to believe that a mental case can be convicted in the first place.

There many others that have convictions and have gone to jail and have changed their life by pursuing tertiary programs. They don;t go around telling their past to elicit sympathy.

He thinks he is smarter than others. AG already appealed against sentence and this guy is screwed.

if people believe chee soon juan was sacked becos he joined an opp party instead of petty theft, they would believe any shits.:wink:
 

TNP(Tua Neh Pau)

Alfrescian
Loyal
lidat also can cum? At least must see this mah...

1040260810.gif
 
Top