Sinkapore long-term survival lies with Malaysia not China not FT policy! Must read!

[Tiu Kwang Yew]

Sinkapore long term survival lies with Malaysia not China and not policy ! Must read !

PAP huge Investments in China benefits Local Singaporeans ? Yes or not?
If Ah Goh (u people call wooden) say so, in what sense ? Can tok out or not, Ah Goh ?
Suzchou and Tienjin, now guan-tin-dong, any benefit, Ah Goh ?

Bottomline of overseas investments must be good to the people right ?

Just to tell yu people, China In Africa got at least 30 to 50 US billions investments, you think why they are there ? of course to take and leave after finish the business. You think they go there to make jobs for the Africans ? Make Africans rich ?

What history told you China can make other countries rich ? A big big mistake to dream China will make sinkaporeans rich !
After the old Robert up the lorry, you people may know what is happening ..............!

Ah Goh sounds like a rubber stamp than a investor right ! But he knows back to shore will take 100 yrs to redeem, so be it, be in hell, go deeper ! Of course if the relic up the lorry, what he do ?

Last week the ancient one wore cheongsam, this week he wears turban without a beard , we know winning votes is veri difficult but tok race and religion is easy right ? Race and religion is sensitive right, so you use race card, you win ?

Your eduction has failed badly, becos only FTs can bring in new skills to sinkapore ? First- class and grade -A Govt has to lick aliens assholes ? Or may be you want to win new -citizens' votes right and tok muck cok about population !
Stop at two works too well like sinkaporee is not flood-free right ?

So Investing in JB Iskandar will see reality Sinkapore dares not face… but you see JB so near Sinkapore, if JB is good ,then Sinkapore has to crawl behind JB right……then the fake housing price in Sinkapore will crumpled right. HDB 3 room becum 20k right!

You so scared to invest in JB becos you think PAP casinos must win right----so pitiful right ! If Iskandar go well, sinkapore collapses right ! it will be home for many local sinkaporeans right / You sacred like this will happen right !

Anway Iskandar will go smoothly and you will see the truth someday soon with or without sinkapore !

You can see the old one is still toking and why not he takes over as PM again , becos if so-called MM or SM keeps hogging the news and indirectly have influences on sinkapore politics , then so –called PM of sinkapore should step down right…..becos too many heads, who to listen right ? !

Modern sinkapore has no peace if we keep toking about race riots in 1964 or 65 right? Dont like that lah, keep threatening people to win votes, 50 years of lavish living not enough meh ?

Think critically, ---wear cheongsam or turban can get anything? The most you win votes right but long term what you got ?

Like it or not, long term survival is with Malaysia----you wear Songkok ( kris not kris up to u ), you have fresh water and cheap food and affordable housing and a big city three times the size of sinkapoor , and a purpose in life not paying HDB loan for 30 years !

If you have done nothing wrong, midnight knock also not scared , but if you have done wrong, your wrongdoings will be dug out one day !

Local sinkaporeans cannot afford to migrate and not learning Malay language is a hell mistake becos new citizens have backdoors to their motherlands…tis is a fact….example---a thai remains a thai even he or she is a naturalized sinkaporean ! Don’t bluff ourselves becos of winning votes, these votes are dirty votes not quality votes !

Wearing Songkok and invest in JB like investing in China style will see sinkapore live longer ! Newater is not the solution for long term ! Many aircon food marts also not the solution, can keep food for three months when famine come also no use !

Sinkapore should have only one PM toking right, if not, it will fall apart faster !
Please spread the words around ! Sinkapore long term survival lies not with China and FTs, come to earth----with malaysia the only way out to humanity and not suffer like hell becos of some face---it is not worth it.....old people will die, if they die......do you follow them to the grave with his history ? fair or not ?

so-called modern sinkapor must go on right....remember 2020 ?

 

[longbow]

Re: Sinkapore long-term survival lies with Malaysia not China not FT policy! Must re

Long term survival lies on its being to play China vs US in terms of influence because of shipping channel.

Sea powers (China will be one in 10 to 20 years) want Singapore as refueling base. Submarine pens, docks for carrier, nice and safe R&R all critical.

Our shipping location alone is worth hundreds of billions over the long term.

I suspect we trade submarine pens to Pentagon in exchange for less enforcement on tax haven

 

[wuqi256]

Re: Sinkapore long-term survival lies with Malaysia not China not FT policy! Must re

Long term survival lies on its being to play China vs US in terms of influence because of shipping channel.

Sea powers (China will be one in 10 to 20 years) want Singapore as refueling base. Submarine pens, docks for carrier, nice and safe R&R all critical.

Our shipping location alone is worth hundreds of billions over the long term.

I suspect we trade submarine pens to Pentagon in exchange for less enforcement on tax haven

Yes, pretty true, just hope they never develop the Kra Isthmus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_Canal

History
As the Malay Peninsula lengthens the shipping routes around Asia significantly, a canal through the Kra Isthmus was suggested as early as 1677, when the Thai King Narai the Great asked the French engineer de Lamar to survey the possibility of building a waterway to connect Songkhla with Marid (now Myanmar). It turned out too impractical with the technology of that time. In 1793 the idea resurfaced when the younger brother of King Chakri (Rama I) suggested it to make it easier to protect the western coast with military ships. Also in the early 18th century the British East India Company became interested in a canal.

After Burma became a British colony in 1863 with Victoria Point opposite the Kra estuary as its southernmost point, an exploration was undertaken, again with negative result. In 1882 the constructor of the Suez canal, Ferdinand de Lesseps, visited the area, but wasn't allowed to investigate in detail by the Thai king. In 1897 Thailand and the British empire agreed not to build a canal there, to protect the regional dominance of the harbour of Singapore.



Recent developments

In the 20th century the idea resurfaced several times again, now changing the preferred route to somewhere in Southern Thailand, to connect the Bandon Bay near Surat Thani with Phangnga. A Japanese plan for a canal in 1985 would have used over twenty nuclear devices each roughly twice the explosive energy of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. The latest proposed site is across Nakhon Si Thammarat and Trang provinces. If finished, it is believed that the canal would bring an economic boost to the nearby area and the whole country. The canal would compete directly with ports in the Strait of Malacca area, including Port Klang and Singapore.

As a substitute the construction of a land bridge was started in 1993, however as the location of the harbors wasn't fixed, highway 44 as the only finished part of the project now does not end at the sea yet. The two lanes were built 150 m apart to leave space for a railroad and eventually also a pipeline. Right now the project is stalled due to environmental concerns.

This is also a reason for recent interest in the canal. The Strait of Malacca, just under 1,000 kilometers long, is narrow, less than 2.5 kilometers at the narrowest, and just 25 meters deep at its shallowest point. It is heavily used by oil tankers and bulk carriers. Some 80 percent of Japan's oil supplies pass through the Straits. Any planned canal in Thailand would mean that large ships could travel through the region from India and on to China and Japan without passing through the pirate-infested Strait of Malacca.[4]

In 2005 an internal report prepared for U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was leaked to The Washington Times, spelling out China's strategy of underwriting construction of the canal across the Kra Isthmus complete with Chinese port facilities and refineries, as part of its "string of pearls" strategy of forward bases and energy security.[5] The Chinese plan called for construction over ten years employing roughly 30,000 workers and costing between 20 and 25 billion American dollars.[6]

 

[shelltox]

Re: Sinkapore long-term survival lies with Malaysia not China not FT policy! Must re

If they had started to dig the kra canal using chankol from the 18 centuries ,by now they would have a decent canal