• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sinkapore business are useless!

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
27,901
Points
113
Firms warn of layoffs to cope with costs

Companies here may have to lay off workers to cope with cost pressures as they respond to what they say is a Budget that is more focused on the long term than addressing their immediate concerns.

While business leaders whom BT spoke to commended the government for doing more to encourage productivity and innovation, they felt that the absence of direct measures to help firms with cost and cash flow issues meant that they might need to try to do more with less by cutting their headcount.

"I applaud the government's efforts to cater to the needs of SMEs in the Budget. But even though this is a good start, I believe the government can still do more, as SMEs are often faced with pressure margins and rising costs," said Yong Yean Chau, CEO of Parkway Trust Management.

"There are good things in the Budget to push through the economic transformation. In order to gain productivity, companies will need to look at technology and automation, but there is a limit to how much of that we can do," added Douglas Foo, chairman of Sakae Holdings.

Ong Jun Quan, executive director of Soon Li Heng Civil Engineering, said that he had hoped that the Budget would provide some cash grants to SMEs to help them with their cash flow problems.

Given the Budget's emphasis on restructuring, firms said that they will leverage on the productivity measures to reduce manpower costs. "The Productivity and Innovation Credits (PIC) scheme is a major point in the Budget, and it is beneficial to SMEs. But as costs continue to rise, we will have to do with lesser manpower and more efficiency. Through the PIC, the government is helping us to do that," said Arun Narula, chairman of Mercantile Pacific Asia. His company aims to be more efficient in two years' time by tapping the extended PIC scheme and introducing new technology and automation.

Sakae Holding's Mr Foo acknowledged that the enhancement of the Continuing Education and Training (CET) system through a $500 million increase of the Lifelong Learning Endowment Fund (LLEF) will help people to upgrade their skills and be more mobile. He explained that with gains in productivity, if companies needed fewer man-hours for projects, then "they do not need full-time employees to be there all the time". This frees up employees to work freelance or part-time for a few employers in the industry, he said. Under such a shared-labour resources model, companies can become more nimble with a leaner workforce.

Mr Foo noted that since there are limits to how much productivity certain sectors can gain through technology and automation alone, the Budget could have introduced measures to help companies relook their business models and address their cost problems. "The Budget contained measures to help start-ups, but I feel that there is already enough help for start-ups out there. Instead, there should have been a focus on helping SMEs with business model innovation through grants to engage consultants, for example, so that they can review their business models to remain more competitive," he said.

The Budget was also concerned with improving productivity in the construction sector through raising levies for lower-skilled foreign labour, a skills upgrading scheme for these workers, the use of more productive materials and extended employment stay in Singapore for higher-skilled labourers.

Soon Li Heng's Mr Ong said that these measures were designed to help construction firms reduce their reliance on manpower, particularly low-skilled foreign labour. For instance, the push for more productive materials such as prefabrication units would cut down on the amount of manpower needed.

While he welcomed the skills upgrading scheme, Mr Ong felt that this was bitter-sweet for him. "As for the skills upgrading course, some of my workers are really good in some skills but they are generally not good in English or languages in general. Therefore they will fall through the cracks because they may not be able to pass the course and upgrade even though they are really good in their work," he said.

As for the extension of period of employment for higher-skilled workers, he pointed out that this only applied to workers from non-traditional sources (NTS) and China, but the bulk of his workers came from traditional sources, particularly India. "So for me, this measure does not change my situation. Again, they are on the same shorter work permit stays as before, unless I now go and replace them with NTS workers."

Interestingly, the companies that BT spoke to seemed unfazed by the the increase in employer's contribution to CPF, saying that this was likely to have a minimum impact on them.

Some firms welcomed the measures to boost the internationalisation of local companies. "With the simplification of programmes such as the Market Readiness Assistance and Global Company Partnerships, SMEs are a step closer to having the support needed for their plans to succeed internationally," said Ingrid Sidiadinoto, managing director of UPS Singapore.

Mr Narula added that these measures are positive as they will help increase Singapore brands globally. "From our perspective, we welcome these timely measures as we are preparing to expand our brand globally in the next few years."
 
They are asking for handouts. SME are the cheappos ...they want cheap workers and never want to spend to improve. Now, want government to give them money to help them with cashflow. Alamak, let these SME die.
 
Singapore SMEs are the greatest whinners in the world. The root of such problems is due to our complacent NTUC "labour union" and a pro-business PAP who has multiple monopolising businesses in Singapore. The flawed policies of cheap influx of foreigners by millions, have resulted in entitltement mindset of many SMEs here. This is akin to asking for welfare from the state. They felt Singapore owe them and even threaten to retrench, leave or close down their business if the govt policies do not allow them to milk more from the system.

Employers in Singapore, are a bunch of lazy, cheapo, opportunists with no innovative brain. Their brain are too packed with greed they can't think like Jews, japanese or German. Sometimes, the cost is not due to manpower but their whole bunch of family members coming on board in the company to get paid by thousands of dollars for doing nothing while the employee are not getting their deserving due. The boss also have the tendency to feel laxed, regular-golf players and spending huge amount of company monies in the name of "entertainment" that yield no results. They blamed poor business squarely on employee for not helping to grow the business but themselves are not putting equal effort to see the company grow because they were so infatuated in going around the systems for loopholes and limp to our ministers for goodies by - becoming grasslooters.

The cause of many SMEs downfall is not due to manpower cost. By putting $2 capital and expecting huge profit thru cheap labour exploitation is beyond our imaginations. The major issues lies in high rental, utilities, lack of business acumen, and not willing to think out of the box are the major factors of many business failures. Singapore business also have the tendency of copy-cat which explains so many reptitive model of business in Singapore. They kill each other instead of complementing each other. You can have many chicken rice stalls in the same coffee shop, and some are likely to wind up because their chicken rice taste nasty, stingy and non creative, nothing to do with expensive manpower.

To put blame squarely on manpower is the greatest denial one could ever get, given that our coporate tax is one of the world's lowest. If these type of companies/SMEs cannot survive in Singapore, you bet they will burn to death venturing overseas.

Ulitimately, it is this govt to blame for making SMEs in Singapore feel pampered like a baby by giving them influx of cheap foreign toys to play. Now we have no room for such toys and they still want more. SMEs = Spoilt brat to say the least.
 
Last edited:
Singapore SMEs are the greatest whinners in the world. The root of such problems is due to our complacent NTUC "labour union" and a pro-business PAP who has multiple monopolising businesses in Singapore. The flawed policies of cheap influx of foreigners by millions, have resulted in entitltement mindset of many SMEs here. This is akin to asking for welfare from the state. They felt Singapore owe them and even threaten to retrench, leave or close down their business if the govt policies do not allow them to milk more from the system.

Employers in Singapore, are a bunch of lazy, cheapo, opportunists with no innovative brain. Their brain are too packed with greed they can't think like Jews, japanese or German. Sometimes, the cost is not due to manpower but their whole bunch of family members coming on board in the company to get paid by thousands of dollars for doing nothing while the employee are not getting their deserving due. The boss also have the tendency to feel laxed, regular-golf players and spending huge amount of company monies in the name of "entertainment" that yield no results. They blamed poor business squarely on employee for not helping to grow the business but themselves are not putting equal effort to see the company grow because they were so infatuated in going around the systems for loopholes and limp to our ministers for goodies by - becoming grasslooters.

The cause of many SMEs downfall is not due to manpower cost. By putting $2 capital and expecting huge profit thru cheap labour exploitation is beyond our imaginations. The major issues lies in high rental, utilities, lack of business acumen, and not willing to think out of the box are the major factors of many business failures. Singapore business also have the tendency of copy-cat which explains so many reptitive model of business in Singapore. They kill each other instead of complementing each other. You can have many chicken rice stalls in the same coffee shop, and some are likely to wind up because their chicken rice taste nasty, stingy and non creative, nothing to do with expensive manpower.

To put blame squarely on manpower is the greatest denial one could ever get, given that our coporate tax is one of the world's lowest. If these type of companies/SMEs cannot survive in Singapore, you bet they will burn to death venturing overseas.

Ulitimately, it is this govt to blame for making SMEs in Singapore feel pampered like a baby by giving them influx of cheap foreign toys to play. Now we have no room for such toys and they still want more. SMEs = Spoilt brat to say the least.

...................& the joke is these clown bosses stay in big houses, drive Merc or BMW and have Porche or Ferrari or Lamboghini parked at home!!!
Make tons of money they get to keep; lose money they cry mother, cry father!!
 
SG businesses are not competitive as they are addicted to cheap labour and are not innovative nor creative. they depend on govt measures that suppressed workers' salaries to survive. But such suppression is short term and lured the businesses into complacency. these businesses ought to die out or leave SG. We dont welcome businesses which exploit workers
 
From my point of view if company cannot cope with 1% increase in CPF contribution or progressive worker levy increase. They should just roll down shutter door.
There will be always new player coming in to take over.
No point keep subsidy the company using tax payer money.
 
we called that sinkie business and i am not one of them... stay away from sinkie and you will prosper..
 
we called that sinkie business and i am not one of them... stay away from sinkie and you will prosper..

yeah sure. the whole bunch of people that migrate to Malaysia is because they are too prosperous. none of them did it because of Malaysia's lower cost of living.
 
singapore businesses are losing its competitiveness! especially with the influx of foreign talents taking over. it seems as though we are purposefully handing over our country to them! :oIo:
 
From my point of view if company cannot cope with 1% increase in CPF contribution or progressive worker levy increase. They should just roll down shutter door.
There will be always new player coming in to take over.
No point keep subsidy the company using tax payer money.

This is so true. They have no money (even after govt grant) to buy productive machineries and yet they have all the monies to buy multiple cars, several condominiums for their whole family members and they still whine their companies have "no profit" cannot afford to innovative machines. To make matter worse, our 150th Shit Times are taking every word from SMEs as gospel truth to justify depressing wages.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top