Singaporeans fired to hire foreigners....

[Thick Face Black Heart]

That is my point, the PMEs have no MBA, but the management DO! Please read my post carefully before you reply, so typical of sinkies. The problem with MBAs is that they think they are getting the equivalent form of work done if they hire foreigners!

Absolutely agree on the MBA thing. I have never met an MBA who put his knowledge into good use in a real world situation.

 

[singveld]

it is very good idea to fire these highly paid PME and hire new cheaper FT.
it is their own fault, that they do not use the opportunity to leave the country, when they know what would happen to them eventually when PAP open the FT floodgate, i know this shit since 90's.

 

[PrinceCharming]

it is very good idea to fire these highly paid PME and hire new cheaper FT.
it is their own fault, that they do not use the opportunity to leave the country, when they know what would happen to them eventually when PAP open the FT floodgate, i know this shit since 90's.

The floodgates will be wide open if the Asean Economic Community (AEC) materialises in 2015.

Pinky and his LEEgime are actively pursuing the AEC framework.

When the AEC is implemented across the Asean member countries, employers in Sinkieland aren't permitted to state "This/These position(s) are for Singaporeans and PRs only" in their job advertisements.

You don't have to be a President's Scorer to predict there will be massive inflow of Asean nationals looking for jobs in Sinkieland.

You don't have to be an MBA grad to predict Sinkie PMETs will be passed over in favor of cheaper and younger FTs from other Asean countries.

Other Asean countries have a distinct advantage over Sinkieland. Example: Employers in Thailand or the Philippines can discriminate against the hiring of Sinkie PMETs by requiring the latter to be able to speak and write Thai or Tagalog fluently.

I just can't wait for AEC to become a reality and it becoming a nightmare of gigantic proportions for Pinky and his miniSTARS.

 

[greedy and cunning]

This has happened to many of my friends especially older
Singaporeans above 40. The way is done is to purposely give a poor assessment then
use it to sack you. Many of my friends spends 15-20yrs
with a company suddenly accused of inxompetence and sack....imagine for.20
yrs they perform responsibly sacked without given a chance.

These incidents have been reported by many bloggers
and by ordinary singapireans but fallen on deaf ears of the PAP.

the famous question : ask your friends who they voted for .

 

[kingrant]

Citibanks is one of those culprits who displaced locals to hire Indian nationals. Where is our national idiot Lim Swee Say and his dogs? Isnt it time for these mongrels to stand up and defend our national servicemen? What are we paying them for?

 

[The_Hypocrite]

Floodgates is being opened every where. Even in ozland. So its same shit different place.

it is very good idea to fire these highly paid PME and hire new cheaper FT.
it is their own fault, that they do not use the opportunity to leave the country, when they know what would happen to them eventually when PAP open the FT floodgate, i know this shit since 90's.

 

[halsey02]

Citibanks is one of those culprits who displaced locals to hire Indian nationals. Where is our national idiot Lim Swee Say and his dogs? Isnt it time for these mongrels to stand up and defend our national servicemen? What are we paying them for?

Ctibank is filled with Malaysian FT's...Ah Nehs a lot, Pinoys...the locals working there are a minority & all of them are contract staff...see the catch!!

 

[Dark Knight]

Citibanks is one of those culprits who displaced locals to hire Indian nationals. Where is our national idiot Lim Swee Say and his dogs? Isnt it time for these mongrels to stand up and defend our national servicemen? What are we paying them for?

Not only Citibank.
Our own DBS/POSB Bank is also one of those culprits who displaced locals to hire Indian nationals.
Even their CEO is also an Indian chap. He has brought in the entire Indian village (with the permission and support of our sillypore gahbrament).

 

[Spock]

If that is the case, how can an 'unprofitable' company survive? and wont the higher ups look into this due to the bottom line shrinking? The company is spending huge on pay and the employees are not productive,,,does not make sense.

If you have worked in a big MNC before, you will know the numbers are a mess and profitability is not easily attributable to any single factor. Employee productivity can be masked for a long time as long as the profit numbers are still healthy. Don't forget, the managers are employees too, making a little less profit doesn't affect them much if the blame is not falling on them.

 

[TopSage]

the famous question : ask your friends who they voted for .

ask alrdy...not the PAP but the other 60% did them in

 

[winnipegjets]

"Letting in millions of foreigners could be good for the economy but is hurting ordinary people. It's like the government has eaten a piece of fatty meat and doesn't want to spit it out."

 

[Leongsam]

"Letting in millions of foreigners could be good for the economy but is hurting ordinary people. It's like the government has eaten a piece of fatty meat and doesn't want to spit it out."

When a govt runs a country, it has to adopt the macro view. It cannot guarantee that everyone will benefit. However, as long as the country gains as a whole, it means the policy is good one.

 

[winnipegjets]

When a govt runs a country, it has to adopt the macro view. It cannot guarantee that everyone will benefit. However, as long as the country gains as a whole, it means the policy is good one.

If the majority of the people are not benefitting from the growth, the growth is meaningless. It is just a number constructed to measure progress inadequately.

 

[halsey02]

When a govt runs a country, it has to adopt the macro view. It cannot guarantee that everyone will benefit. However, as long as the country gains as a whole, it means the policy is good one.

Twit, who doesn't know Micro/Macro Economic, my first book in school on economics was John Lloyd Hanson http://books.google.com.sg/books/about/A_textbook_of_economics.html?id=wQOxAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y "A textbook on Economics"..later I went into deeper stuff from John Maynard Keynes etc..

We are talking rice bowls, people rice bowls...the protection of people's rice bowl, of course we do not expect the government to 'pour rice' into the bowls, but the duty of the government in which we had voted for, at least protect that RICE BOWL...not break them! did they do that, no?? it was only, when the voting pattern start to change..did they attempt feebly to do something...how many had starved..but didn't 'die' yet! over these so many years.

Nothing to do with micro or macro managing the economic..who doesn't know that..the country gains, the income inequality is as wide as the distance between the earth & the sun..

Anyway...the SINgapore workers, deserve what they get & wished for.

 

[chonburifc]

Twit, who doesn't know Micro/Macro Economic, my first book in school on economics was John Lloyd Hanson http://books.google.com.sg/books/about/A_textbook_of_economics.html?id=wQOxAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y "A textbook on Economics"..later I went into deeper stuff from John Maynard Keynes etc..

We are talking rice bowls, people rice bowls...the protection of people's rice bowl, of course we do not expect the government to 'pour rice' into the bowls, but the duty of the government in which we had voted for, at least protect that RICE BOWL...not break them! did they do that, no?? it was only, when the voting pattern start to change..did they attempt feebly to do something...how many had starved..but didn't 'die' yet! over these so many years.

Nothing to do with micro or macro managing the economic..who doesn't know that..the country gains, the income inequality is as wide as the distance between the earth & the sun..

Anyway...the SINgapore workers, deserve what they get & wished for.

Well said! Swee. If own people cannot take care first, and take care of outsiders, this I call traitors, treason also can. When the pappies lose majority in parliamemt, it's the time to trial these traitors for treason.
For once, I support the ancient pratice of beheading 9 clans of the pappies traitors.

 

[pillowtalk]

Why do you think Patrick Tay is pushing for labour market testing and even stricter enforcement to protect Singaporeans? Lol. Watch for radical changes in EA. Coming soon.

 

[Leongsam]

We are talking rice bowls, people rice bowls...the protection of people's rice bowl, of course we do not expect the government to 'pour rice' into the bowls, but the duty of the government in which we had voted for, at least protect that RICE BOWL...not break them!

The government provides plenty of rice. However, many Singaporeans are too inept to be be able to take advantage of the abundant rice available. That's their own fault. You can't blame the government for that.

 

[red amoeba]

seen w my own eyes ...ft earn more but less productive...that company is doomed

 

[Thick Face Black Heart]

When a govt runs a country, it has to adopt the macro view. It cannot guarantee that everyone will benefit. However, as long as the country gains as a whole, it means the policy is good one.

The current FT policy benefits only the rich and elite.. The lower and middle classes don't benefit as they have their wages suppressed. It is not true that society benefits as a whole.

 

[Leongsam]

The current FT policy benefits only the rich and elite.. The lower and middle classes don't benefit as they have their wages suppressed. It is not true that society benefits as a whole.

The current FT policy benefits anyone who wants to take full advantage of the availability of a workforce with good skills who don't expect outrageously high salaries.

The opportunities created by the PAP far outweigh the problems caused by current policies.