• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious [ Singapore News ] Beware of Pro Indian Pro PAP Indian Editor : Walter Fernandez & Warren Fernandez

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...nment-say-singapore-mainstream-media-10070790

'It does us no justice’ to be pro-Government, say Singapore's mainstream media

walter-warren.jpg

Mediacorp’s editor-in-chief Walter Fernandez (left) and The Straits Times' editor Warren Fernandez at a hearing for the Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods on Mar 23, 2018.

By Justin Ong
@JustinOngCNA
23 Mar 2018 04:19PM (Updated: 23 Mar 2018 07:14PM)

SINGAPORE: In the age of social media, which gives the public more sources of news, there is no reason for Singapore’s mainstream media outlets to be partisan in its reporting, senior editors of Mediacorp and The Straits Times said on Friday (Mar 23).

They were addressing a parliamentary Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods (DOFs), set up to explore the likes of fake news and its countermeasures - including legislation.

Nominated Member of Parliament Chia Yong Yong, who sits on the panel, suggested that notwithstanding the perpetuation of DOFs, trust in mainstream media “is still high but not as high as it used to be”.

“On the ground, there would have been some erosion of trust,” she said. “There is a perception in certain quarters that the mainstream press is pro-ruling party, or pro-Government, and in some quarters they say mainstream media has now swung the other way.”

In response, Mediacorp's editor-in-chief Walter Fernandez said: “Before the social media advent, there were far fewer brands of news sources. These were larger, more dominant and enjoyed a higher degree of trust.

“The significant fragmentation of the audience has left them with a significantly wider choice … We are judged now quite differently by the expectations of an audience that has moved on significantly, and we have to fight to earn their trust on a daily basis now.”

“In that sort of environment, against that sort of landscape, it does us no justice to want to be ‘pro-A’ or ‘pro-B’ in that sense," Mr Fernandez added.

“Our fundamental premise is we have to provide accurate, contextual and timely information to audiences and allow them to make up their minds.

“Ultimately … (in) moments of crisis, we see people coming back to mainstream media. That speaks to the trust there is within our organisations and the trust Singaporeans hold up the two mainstream media companies with.”

Said Mr Warren Fernandez, editor of The Straits Times: “Over the last five, 10 years we’ve tried extremely hard to be fair, balanced and objective because we see our role as not trying to play up one party or the other, but to give our readers as much information as they can to make decisions for themselves.

“If we were biased, we would be clearly called out on social media. It would backfire and affect our credibility, so we wouldn’t be inclined to do that. I don’t think it does anybody any service if we tried to … it would be a disservice to our readers, a disservice to our journalists, and ultimately I think a disservice to Singapore.”
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...nment-say-singapore-mainstream-media-10070790

'It does us no justice’ to be pro-Government, say Singapore's mainstream media

walter-warren.jpg

.”
Justice has already been done, you did this to yourself - plunge in newspaper subscription, advertisers stopped using your service, readership went downhill, profitablity at it historical lowest and still going south. Hundreds of staffs were forced to leave and you still keep a couple of pro-pap cock suckers. Talk about justice, the msm has none to speak of any. What say you?
 
Last edited:

Semaj2357

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Justice has already been done, you did this to yourself - plunge in newspaper subscription, advertisers stopped using your service, readership went downhill, profitablity at it historical lowest and still going south. Hundreds of staffs were forced to leave and you still keep a couple of pro-pap cock suckers. Talk about justice, the msm has none to speak of any. What say you?
not to mention the ranking in the world press freedom index - can't expect much from a brothel owner and their pimps, enuff said.
https://rsf.org/en
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
These people actually believe they are unbiased and just in their reporting! This is absolutely terrifying on a whole new level.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just look at the recent past chairmen of SPH....SR Nathan & Tony Tan and the current Lim Boon Yang.

No PAP connection?
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal


https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...port-regulation-social-media-mobile-platforms

Mediacorp, SPH editors voice support for regulation of social media, mobile platforms

Published 23 March, 2018

SINGAPORE — Top editors of the Republic's main media outlets voiced support on Friday (March 23) for regulation of major mobile and social media platforms like Facebook, calling for a "level playing field" in terms of taking responsibility for the distribution of online content.

Speaking at a public hearing before the Select Committee studying online falsehoods, the editors, however, cautioned against overly broad new legislation against acts such as hate speech and defamation, which should be dealt with under existing laws.

"There should be thresholds with a combination of metrics to determine reach and frequency to decide what a deliberate online falsehood is, and whether and how to address it," Mr Walter Fernandez, Mediacorp's editor-in-chief, said in the broadcaster's written submission to the committee.

He added: "Where necessary, other areas of so-called 'fake news' which may not meet such thresholds in specific instances, for example, hate-speech and defamation, can and should be dealt with under existing legislation and policy. Where gaps exist that such legislation cannot sufficiently deal with specific instances of deliberate online falsehoods, the select committee should identify these gaps, and explain why existing tools are inadequate."

Echoing similar comments in its separate written submission, editors of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) argued that any new or amended legislation should focus on distribution platforms which are relatively unregulated, such as social media and messaging applications like WhatsApp and Telegram.

"Legislation that restricts the investigative and reporting power of the media would hit the wrong target, as newsrooms already have rigorous and effective mechanisms to check and counter falsehoods. It might also inadvertently curb the media’s ability to fulfil its critical role in informing society, or to remain credible in the eyes of its readers," added SPH.

Their comments came a day after the select committee grilled several representatives from Facebook and other global technology firms like Google and Twitter on their roles and responsibilities in this area. Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, for instance, questioned at length Facebook’s actions over a major data breach involving political data firm Cambridge Analytica, and later criticised the social media giant's behaviour as “inexplicable” and “inexcusable”.

At Friday's hearing, select committee member and Nominated Member of Parliament Chia Yong Yong asked the editors whether their call for regulating the online platforms was borne out of self-interest, and "to get rid of people who provide alternative channels for freedom of expression".
 
Top