• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious [ Singapore News ] Beware of Indian : Jeevan Vasagar "Singapore owes success to British Colonialism"

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal



https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/sing...-has-been-beneficial-for-singapore/ar-BBHTosZ

The Guardian raises outrage with column arguing that colonialism has been beneficial for Singapore

Coconuts

1 hour ago

In a bold, scandalous claim made in a column for The Guardian, veteran English journalist Jeevan Vasagar proclaimed that colonialism — the very act defined as a full or partial occupation over another country for economic exploitation — can actually be regarded as a Very Good Thing, and that Singapore is a shining example.

Basically, he argues, Singapore is the prosperous, successful country it is now because it was ruled by British colonial masters in the past.

“Singapore shows us that colonialism can work”

Though the article’s headline might seem like an extensive argument for imperial rule, the piece itself is more about how Singapore’s post-colonial governance adapted certain elements from its colonial past. We made use of the “tools” left behind, like Sir Stamford Raffles’ economic liberalism, English as a lingua franca, and the English common law system.

“Its postcolonial rulers seized the advantages left them by the British empire and used them for the benefit of wider society; Singapore at independence was a profoundly unequal society in which many of its people were unskilled laborers living in slums,” Jeevan wrote.

“It is now a rich country in which most of the population lives in municipal housing while their children attend excellent state schools. There is a further crucial difference from the colonial past; Singapore now holds elections to choose its leaders. This was not the case until near the end of British rule, when the colony was allowed a measure of self-government.”

Nothing was mentioned about how colonialism enslaved natives and uprooted them other countries by force; how local traditions and cultures were decimated to make way for “Western values”; how it inculcated social conflicts within colonized countries; or how resources were stripped bare from colonies with only the mother country benefitting from it all.
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
I fully agree that Singapore owes its success to the British. Without the Ang Mohs Singapore would be no different from Batam or Bintan Island.

It is the British that made Singapore attractive to the peasant stock from China and India and it would not be the melting pot and shining example of racial harmony that it is today.

Without its colonial past the PAP would never have existed.

We need to honor the Ang Mohs and thank them for what they have done for the country.
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
Then why is India a shithole ?

Indians are the Greatest British Cock Sucking Caucasian Wannabe Hypocritical Cobra Snakes
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
Every british-cock-sucking INDIAN mindset:

If a british colony does well, "see, colonialism was good"
If a british colony does badly, "see, colonialism was good"
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Every british-cock-sucking INDIAN mindset:

If a british colony does well, "see, colonialism was good"
If a british colony does badly, "see, colonialism was good"

Without the British India and Pakistan would not dominate the Cricket world. The Ang Mohs are clearly the best.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
If there was no opium where 40% of the ecomony was from opium trade the British will come glorify their credit with annual BE day or Queen Birthday.

Australia has Queen Birthday holiday so why no Queen Birthday holiday in Singapore?

No one dare to bring up evil BE committing opium trade. Why too ashamed to tell the world they made millions of dollars in Opium trade targeting mainly Chinese community.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Without the Indian army the British could not be an Empire. A small island of only $10m population would not even have 50,000 soldiers to form an army try to conquered 1/3 of the world.

That tiny size of army cannot even last 3 wars want to be an Empire?


Without the British India and Pakistan would not dominate the Cricket world. The Ang Mohs are clearly the best.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
so boss is saying the founding bustard is a scam. the title belong to sir spankcock laffes
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
This recent debacle for the merits of colonialism and recolonisation was triggered late last year by the publication of Bruce Gilley's essay in the Third World Quarterly entitled: “The Case For Colonialism”:

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.07.47 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.07.56 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.04 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.13 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.28 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.37 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.46 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.08.54 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.09.02 PM.png
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
This was then followed by Nigal Biggar of Oxford announcing his project Ethics and Empire which was met by a backlash from other Oxford and international dons:

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.05.46 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.05.56 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.06.08 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.06.21 PM.png


Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.03.55 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.04.08 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-07 at 12.04.16 PM.png
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
Then why is India a shithole ?

Indians are the Greatest British Cock Sucking Caucasian Wannabe Hypocritical Cobra Snakes
India is a shithole because the british left india,,look at British India,,,I am talking about India, Pakistan and Bangladesh...have things gotten better before or after the british? Look at Hong Kong....things have gotten worse since the return to Commie control....The British as colonisers were not perfect,,but its better than where British India is right now,,,,
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
British India has been independent since 1947..for a country which boast of 5000 year history and culture etc,,,surely 50 years of independence would have brought the country proper economic development,,,,good governance and and proper cultured workforce,,,but look at the ah neh workers in singkieland etc,,,there is a reason why they are known as Snakes. So basically these ah neh have failed since independence. Easy to blame the british etc,,,but they are basically not getting their act today when you see the country it is today. And the British united India by colonialism, they all have the same language of administration etc. If the british did not colonise ah neh land, the world will be a better place because these ah nehs will be fighting amongst themselves and they will stay where they are suppose to be,,,and of course culling will be a good thing too,,,
 
Top