• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious [ Singapore News ] Beware of Indian : If I Can't Steal From You, I Murder You

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,889
Points
83
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/man-gets-18-years-jail-for-killing-ex-bosss-mum

Man gets 18 years' jail for killing ex-boss' mum
Published
1 hour ago
Selina Lum
Law Correspondent

SINGAPORE - A 50-year-old man who killed a grandmother he had known for a decade after she caught him stealing her jewellery was on Thursday (July 20) jailed for 18 years.

The High Court rejected the prosecution's argument that P. Mageswaran should be given the maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

Mageswaran was convicted in May of culpable homicide for strangling and suffocating Madam Kanne Lactmy, 62, in her Yishun Street 81 flat in 2013.

"This is a sufficiently stiff sentence to punish the accused for a heinous crime in which he has unnecessarily taken away a life, to deter the accused from committing further offences and to serve as general signal that such acts are not to be condoned," said Judicial Commissioner Hoo Sheau Pheng.

She also rejected the prosecution's arguments that Mageswaran should get an additional six months' jail as he cannot be caned. The age limit for caning is 50.

Giving reasons for the 18-year jail term, she said she disagreed with prosecutors that the case fell under the worst type of culpable homicide cases, which would warrant the maximum sentence.

This was not a premeditated offence, she said, but a case of robbery gone "terribly and tragically wrong".

She also noted that the acts of strangulation and suffocation were undoubtedly vicious, but there was no exceptional cruelty involved, which would place the case at the end of the spectrum as being one of the worst type of cases of culpable homicide.

She also disagreed with prosecutors that there has been an abuse of trust and that greed was the motivating factor.

She accepted neuropsychological tests submitted by the defence that Mageswaran suffered from mental impairments that affected his control over his conduct when he killed Madam Lactmy on the spur of the moment to silence her after he was caught red-handed.

However, she agreed with prosecutors that due weight must be given to Mageswaran's long criminal record.

She said he did not seem to have been deterred by the relatively stiff sentence of six years' jail and 24 strokes of the cane for a series of robberies in 2007.

Mageswaran used to work for Madam Lactmy's older son and was invited to their family gatherings.

On Dec 9, 2013, Mageswaran, who lived in Johor Baru with his Malaysian wife, arrived at Madam Lactmy's flat at about 8.35am and asked to borrow $2,000 to $3,000. He needed RM5,000 (S$1,600) for an instalment payment on his new flat. She said she did not have so much money.

When she went to brush her teeth, Mageswaran searched the flat and found a box containing jewellery and pawnshop tickets. Madam Lactmy caught him and demanded that he return the box, but he pleaded with her for it.

When she said she would call her son, Mageswaran pressed a pillow over her face with his right hand, while he choked her with his left.

He left with the box and later pawned the jewellery for RM26,300. He used the cash to pay for his flat, and also splurged on his wife and himself.

He was arrested eight days later at Woodlands Checkpoint on his way back to Singapore.

Topics: SINGAPORE CRIME SINGAPORE COURTS MURDER/MANSLAUGHTER
 
man.jpg
P. Mageswaran being escorted back to the scene of the crime by the police on Dec 23, 2013. PHOTO: ST FILE
 
How come the Law Correspondent never mention the name of the defence lawyer? Last time when Subhas was around, his name would be advertised big big.
 
why are sinkie taxpayer footing this murderous dalit living expense for next 10years...goodness, just HOTA this bastard ..why wont judge?
 
Chinese stole one island from the malays and nobody raise any objection.
 
Back
Top